Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1965 Ford Falcon Wagon Factory 289 Auto on 2040-cars

Year:1965 Mileage:78000 Color: Blue /
 Blue
Location:

Cabot, Arkansas, United States

Cabot, Arkansas, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Wagon
Engine:289
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Condition:

Used

VIN (Vehicle Identification Number)
: 5H22C148369
Year: 1965
Interior Color: Blue
Make: Ford
Number of Cylinders: 8
Model: Falcon
Trim: WAGON
Drive Type: AUTO
Mileage: 78,000
Exterior Color: Blue

1965 FORD FALCON WAGON FACTORY 289 WITH AUTO TRANS   THIS IS A NICE LITTLE WAGON I BOUGHT THIS WAGON FROM THE GUY THAT HAD IT SINCE 1984  BACK IN THE LATE 80"S HE HAD THE CAR PAINTED.(NOT A SHOW PAINT JOB,  DRIVER PAINT THERE ARE A FEW NICKS HERE AND THERE BUT GOOD ENOUGH FOR CRUISES LOCAL SHOWS) THE FLOOR HAS SOME MINOR RUST THAT WAS PATCHED AND THE DRIVERS DOOR HAS 2 OR 3 SMALL BUBBLES!! NOT BAD AT ALL FOR A CAR THAT IS 49 YEARS OLD.  THE MAN TOLD ME HE HAD THE MOTOR REBUILT 289 WITH THE C5 INTAKE STILL ON THE MOTOR  I PUT THE CHROME VALVE COVERS ON THE MOTOR AND THE ENGINE IS VERY CLEAN INSIDE AND THE HEADS SAY "289" ON THEM!!! IN THE LATE 80'S HE ALSO HAD THE SEATS REDONE THEY LOOK VERY GOOD. I PUT NEW TIRES WITH FACTORY WIRE SPINNERS CAPS ON THE WAGON TIRES HAVE LESS THAN 100 MILES ON THEM  THE OLDER MAN I GOT THE CAR FROM SAID HE ALWAYS KEPT IT INSIDE  THE SPEEDOMETER AND GAS GAUGE ARE NOT WORKING BUT I HAVE A ONE FOR IT THAT GOES WITH THE CAR  THIS IS A VERY GOOD CRUISING WAGON IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTION FEEL FREE TO CALL 501-519-2477 OR EMAIL  

as for the floors the front drivers floor has sheet metal over a very small spot  drivers rear is very nice. pass. side rear has a small patch about a 1 foot square same for pass  front.  for a 49 year old car its not very bad.  this is a TENNESSEE CAR car is now in arkansas   

Auto Services in Arkansas

Young`s Tire & Auto ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers
Address: 511 S Main St, Russell
Phone: (501) 268-3538

Waller`s Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 748 New Country Rd, Little-Rock-Air-Force-Base
Phone: (501) 843-5869

Trumann Auto Parts Napa ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories, Battery Supplies
Address: 137 Highway 463 N, Caraway
Phone: (870) 483-6319

Tracy`s Foreign ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories
Address: 646 Monroe Avenue Ext, West-Memphis
Phone: (901) 526-1644

Southern Pride Mech & Detail ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Detailing, Car Wash
Address: 3864 Highway 62 412, Hardy
Phone: (870) 856-2505

Scott Automotive Center Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers
Address: 14831 Highway 165, Scott
Phone: (501) 961-9300

Auto blog

Consumer Reports says these are the worst new cars of 2014

Thu, 27 Feb 2014

Consumer Reports has announced its annual list of worst vehicles, a cringe-inducing contrast to its list of top vehicles. Ignominiously leading the way in 2014 is Chrysler, which has a staggering seven models listed.
Jeep nearly sweeps the small SUV segment by itself, with its Compass, Patriot and 2.4-liter version of the new Cherokee, while the only midsize sedans listed by CR were the Chrysler 200 and Dodge Avenger. The new Dodge Dart and the Dodge Journey round out CR's condemnation of Chrysler.
Ford is taking heat as well, with the Taurus, Edge and their counterparts from Lincoln all listed as the worst vehicles in their respective segments. Toyota doesn't fare much better, with its Lexus IS, Scion iQ and tC also making the list.

Lexus tops JD Power Vehicle Dependability Study again, Buick bests Toyota

Wed, Feb 25 2015

It shouldn't surprise anyone, but Lexus has once again taken the top spot in JD Power's Vehicle Dependability Study. That'd be the Japanese luxury brand's fourth straight year at the top of table. The big news, though, is the rise of Buick. General Motor's near-premium brand beat out Toyota to take second place, with 110 problems per 100 vehicles compared to Toyota's 111 problems. Lexus owners only reported 89 problems per 100 vehicles. Besides Buick's three-position jump, Scion enjoyed a major improvement, jumping 13 positions from 2014. Ram and Mitsubishi made big gains, as well, moving up 11 and 10 positions, respectively. In terms of individual segments, GM and Toyota both excelled, taking home seven segment awards each. The study wasn't good news for all involved, though. A number of popular automakers finished below the industry average of 147 problems per 100 vehicles, including Subaru, (157PP100), Volkswagen (165PP100), Ford/Hyundai (188PP100 each) and Mini (193PP100). The biggest losers (by a tremendous margin, we might add) were Land Rover and Fiat, recording 258 and 273 problems per 100 vehicles. The next closest brand was Jeep, with 197PP100. While the Vehicle Dependability Study uses the same measurement system as the Initial Quality Survey, the two metrics analyze very different things. The VDS looks at problems experienced by original owners of model year 2012 vehicles over the past 12 months, while the oft-quoted IQS focuses on problems in the first 90 days of new-vehicle ownership. Like the IQS, though, the VDS has a rather broad definition of what a problem is. Because of that, a low score from JD Power is no guarantee of extreme unreliability, so much as just poor design. In this most recent study, the two most reported problems focused on Bluetooth connectivity and the voice-command systems. The former leaves plenty of room for user error due to poor design (particularly true of the Bluetooth systems on the low-scoring Fords, Volkswagens and Subarus), while the second is something JD Power has already confirmed as being universally terrible. That makes means that while these studies are important, they shouldn't be taken as gospel when it comes to automotive reliability. News Source: JD PowerImage Credit: Copyright 2015 Jeremy Korzeniewski / AOL Buick Fiat Ford GM Hyundai Jeep Land Rover Lexus MINI Mitsubishi RAM Scion Subaru Toyota Volkswagen Auto Repair Ownership study

Autoblog's Editors' Picks: Our complete list of the best new vehicles

Mon, May 13 2024

It's not easy to earn an “EditorsÂ’ Picks” at Autoblog as part of the rating and review process that every new vehicle goes through. Our editors have been at it a long time, which means weÂ’ve driven and reviewed virtually every new car you can go buy on the dealer lot. There are disagreements, of course, and all vehicles have their strengths and weaknesses, but this list features what we think are the best new vehicles chosen by Autoblog editors. We started this formal review process back in 2018, so there's quite of few of them now. So what does it mean to be an EditorsÂ’ Pick? In short, it means itÂ’s a car that we can highly recommend purchasing. There may be one, multiple, or even zero vehicles in any given segment that we give the green light to. What really matters is that itÂ’s a vehicle that weÂ’d tell a friend or family member to go buy if theyÂ’re considering it, because itÂ’s a very good car. The best way to use this list is is with the navigation links below. Click on a segment, and you'll quickly arrive at the top rated pickup truck or SUV, for example. Use the back button to return to these links and search in another segment, like sedans. If youÂ’ve been keeping up with our monthly series of the latest vehicles to earn EditorsÂ’ Pick status, youÂ’re likely going to be familiar with this list already. If not, welcome to the complete list that weÂ’ll be keeping updated as vehicles enter (and others perhaps exit) the good graces of our editorial team. We rate a new car — giving it a numerical score out of 10 — every time thereÂ’s a significant refresh or if it happens to be an all-new model. Any given vehicle may be impressive on a first drive, but we wait until itÂ’s in the hands of our editors to put it through the same type of testing as every other vehicle that rolls through our test fleet before giving it the EditorsÂ’ Pick badge. This ensures consistency and allows more voices to be heard on each individual model. And just so you donÂ’t think weÂ’ve skipped trims or variants of a model, we hand out the EditorsÂ’ Pick based on the overarching model to keep things consistent. So, when you read that the 3 Series is an EditorsÂ’ Pick, yes, that includes the 330i to the M3 and all the variants in between. If thereÂ’s a particular version of that car we vehemently disagree with, we make sure to call that out.