1967 Ford Fairlane Wagon Hot Rod Rat Rod on 2040-cars
Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States
1967 Ford Fairlane Station Wagon California car All original 289 V8 Automatic No rust Excellent condition inside and out Engine compartment and underside of car are extremely
clean To be perfect, would need new paint. Paint has some cracking from the sun, but
still shines nice. Front lowered 3" Rear stock height New air shocks rear. New Shelby wheels
(17” in front and 18” in rear) New BFG G-Force T/A tires |
Ford Fairlane for Sale
- 1967 ford fairlane rare 390 v8 35,000 original miles a/c auto,red patina finish
- 63 ford fairlane 500 2 door coupe red 289ci show car powerglide classic antique(US $10,500.00)
- 1962 blue runs & drives great body & interior very nice!!
- 1956 ford fairlane town sedan 350 chevy th350(US $2,500.00)
- 1959 ford fairlane galaxie 500 2 doors hardtop(US $9,500.00)
- 1969 ford fairlane fastback, v-8, automatic, solid barn find!
Auto Services in Michigan
Wilson`s Davison Tire & Auto ★★★★★
Wade`s Automotive ★★★★★
Village Ford Inc ★★★★★
Village Ford ★★★★★
U P Tire & Auto Service ★★★★★
Tuffy Auto Service Centers ★★★★★
Auto blog
2015 Ford Mustang vs. Camaro and Challenger [w/poll]
Thu, 17 Jul 2014The horsepower wars are tightening among the Detroit Three, as the Ford Mustang, Chevrolet Camaro and Dodge Challenger are getting bigger, more powerful, and yes, more fuel efficient.
That came into sharper focus this week as more information was revealed about the most insane Challenger ever - the 707-horsepower Hellcat - followed quickly by Ford's in-depth showcase of the 2015 Mustang in Dearborn.
It's shaping up to be a golden age for enthusiasts, and what's under the hood is becoming more important than ever.
Would a Mustang-based Lincoln look like this?
Mon, 07 Jan 2013Designer Josiah LaCalla has taken a stab at what a Ford Mustang-based Lincoln model might look like with the Continental Mark X1 concept. Make no mistake, Ford's luxury arm has made it abundantly clear that it won't be pursuing any new products outside of volume models, which means a flashy halo grand tourer like the one you see here isn't in the cards. LaColla used the Mercedes-Benz SLS AMG as a basis for his creation, which explains the long nose, but we certainly don't mind the idea of a rear-wheel drive Lincoln with a cabin pushed to the aft.
While we're dreaming, there's certainly nothing stopping us from imagining what's under that lengthy hood. We like the idea of the 5.8-liter supercharged V8 from the Shelby GT500 pushing the Mark X1 down the road, but how about something a little more inventive? Something like a high-revving, buttery V12 with enough torque to push the contraption well past 200 miles per hour. Dream a little dream, people.
EPA says fuel economy test for hybrids is accurate
Mon, 26 Aug 2013
The EPA says it stands behind its fuel economy test for hybrid vehicles following controversy about the testing process after Ford C-Max Hybrid customers and automotive journalists alike struggled to achieve 47 miles per gallon, the advertised mpg number, Automotive News reports. Ford responded to the issue almost two weeks ago by claiming that a 1970s-era EPA general label rule was responsible for the inaccurate mileage numbers, rerating the C-Max Hybrid's mpg numbers and offering customers rebates. Ford later said it didn't overstate the C-Max Hybrid's fuel economy and that it was surprised by the low numbers.
Ford technically didn't do anything wrong because it was following the general label rule, but agency regulator Christopher Grundler says the automaker was exploiting a loophole when it came up with the hybrid C-Max numbers, and that the testing process remains accurate. The general label rule allows vehicles that use the same engine and transmission and are in the same weight class to share fuel economy numbers, but it doesn't take into account other factors such as aerodynamic efficiency, which affects hybrids more drastically than non-hybrid vehicles. Ford originally used the Fusion Hybrid economy figures for the C-Max Hybrid and claimed the engineers didn't realize that its aerodynamic efficiency would affect fuel economy as much as it did.