Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2006 Ford F350 Dually on 2040-cars

Year:2006 Mileage:130000 Color: white /
 gray
Location:

Lebanon, Indiana, United States

Lebanon, Indiana, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Automatic
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:6.0 diesel
Fuel Type:Diesel
For Sale By:Private Seller
VIN: 1FDWF37P26EB74172 Year: 2006
Number of Cylinders: 8
Make: Ford
Model: F-350
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Trim: xl
Options: CD Player
Drive Type: 4*4
Safety Features: Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag
Mileage: 130,000
Exterior Color: white
Interior Color: gray
Number of Doors: 2
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

Nice 2006 F350 4*4 with 12' alum flat bed.  One owner and very well maintained.  6.0 Diesel.  Just had all new injectors installed by ford dealer less than 200 miles ago.  Nearly new tires.  Runs great.  Has small rust spot on bottom of door and a small tear in passenger seat.

Auto Services in Indiana

Wolski`s Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Diagnostic Service, Brake Repair
Address: 9749 Spring St, Dyer
Phone: (219) 922-1886

Wheels Auto Sales ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 624 S Walnut St, Gosport
Phone: (812) 331-1524

Tony Kinser Body Shop ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Dent Removal
Address: 2404 N Smith Pike, Unionville
Phone: (812) 558-0757

Tilley`s Hilltop ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Transmission
Address: 4427 E Pleasant Ridge Rd, Madison
Phone: (812) 273-4667

Standard Auto Sales ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Automobile Accessories
Address: 135 N Halsted St, Hammond
Phone: (708) 755-4537

Schepper`s Tires & Batteries ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Used Car Dealers, Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: 100 Main St, Clay-City
Phone: (812) 939-2882

Auto blog

Trump did talk to Bill Ford, but the Kentucky plant was never moving to Mexico

Fri, Nov 18 2016

President-elect Donald J. Trump has been butting heads with Ford for a while now. A lot of it seems to stem from misunderstanding or misrepresenting facts about how the automaker currently does business and its plans for the future. After a sit-down with executive chairman Bill Ford Jr., the misunderstandings continue, but Trump has apparently convinced the company to make some changes. During his campaign, Trump claimed that Ford was going to fire US workers and move manufacturing to Mexico. That wasn't the case – yes, Ford planned to transfer Focus and C-Max production from Wayne, Michigan, to Cuautitlan, Mexico, but no, that wouldn't mean anyone losing their job. The Wayne plant will continue to operate, and likely busier than before, as it will be the home of the new Bronco and Ranger. So Ford CEO Mark Fields responded with the facts, and then chairman Bill Ford Jr. sat down with Trump over the summer. Things apparently weren't resolved to Trump's satisfaction, so he and Bill Ford spoke on the phone yesterday as he claims in this tweet: This content is hosted by a third party. To view it, please update your privacy preferences. Manage Settings. Let's pick that apart. First off, it's not a Lincoln plant, per se – the Louisville Assembly Plant currently builds the Ford Escape and Lincoln MKC, two small crossovers that share a platform. Ford was considering moving MKC production out of Kentucky to Mexico, but it would not have resulted in many lost jobs if any – the union had already agreed to moving the MKC in 2015 negotiations, and taking production of the slow-selling Lincoln out of the plant would open up capacity for more Fords. Be that as it may, Ford has decided not to move MKC production out of the plant, either for political reasons of placation or because it didn't make the greatest deal of business sense, maybe a combination of the two. That means Trump isn't really saving any American jobs in the short term. If anything, this move could keep Ford supply-constrained and result in reduced sales, which in turn brings the company less money and affects the bottom line and all employees. But that's speculation, so we won't tweet it. There is of course the possibility that Ford will be convinced, either by sheer will or by a more attractive trade situation, to invest in increased US production, which could bear fruit later on. We are told by Ford that the two men did in fact speak yesterday.

Fitting Retirement: Grand Marquis last Mercury off the line

Wed, 05 Jan 2011

The signs have come down and retail production ended back in October of 2010. Now, the very last Mercury model has rolled off the assembly line. This last Mercury somewhat fittingly takes the form of a Grand Marquis reporting for fleet duty. It was built at the St. Thomas plant in Ontario, Canada, which is the same facility that continues to produce the Ford Crown Victoria and Lincoln Town Car for fleet and livery duty.
St. Thomas' days are numbered, however, as the factory is slated to close on August 31. When it goes, the Panther platform is likely to follow. So long, and thanks for all the fish memories.
[Source: Autoweek]Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Nuclear-powered concept cars from the Atomic Age

Thu, 17 Jul 2014

In the 1950s and early 60s, the dawn of nuclear power was supposed to lead to a limitless consumer culture, a world of flying cars and autonomous kitchens all powered by clean energy. In Europe, it offered the then-limping continent a cheap, inexhaustible supply of power after years of rationing and infrastructure damage brought on by two World Wars.
The development of nuclear-powered submarines and ships during the 1940s and 50s led car designers to begin conceptualizing atomic vehicles. Fueled by a consistent reaction, these cars would theoretically produce no harmful byproducts and rarely need to refuel. Combining these vehicles with the new interstate system presented amazing potential for American mobility.
But the fantasy soon faded. There were just too many problems with the realities of nuclear power. For starters, the powerplant would be too small to attain a reaction unless the car contained weapons-grade atomic materials. Doing so would mean every fender-bender could result in a minor nuclear holocaust. Additionally, many of the designers assumed a lightweight shielding material or even forcefields would eventually be invented (they still haven't) to protect passengers from harmful radiation. Analyses of the atomic car concept at the time determined that a 50-ton lead barrier would be necessary to prevent exposure.