2000 Ford F250 Xlt Extended Cab 4x4 7.3l Diesel 1 Owner Don'tmiss It Ready4work on 2040-cars
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Diesel
Transmission:Automatic
For Sale By:Dealer
Make: Ford
Cab Type (For Trucks Only): Extended Cab
Model: F-250
Warranty: Unspecified
Mileage: 132,910
Sub Model: EXTENDED 4X4
Options: Cassette Player
Exterior Color: Black
Safety Features: Driver Airbag
Interior Color: Gray
Power Options: Power Locks
Number of Cylinders: 8
Ford F-250 for Sale
2002 ford f-250 xlt crewcab 2wd 7.3 diesel 114k 1 owner(US $15,500.00)
1999 ford f-250 super duty xlt super cab 4-door v-10(US $6,000.00)
One owner 2003 ford f-250 6.0 diesel ext cab 2wd low miles runs perfect clean
1997 ford f-250 xlt lwb 2-door 7.3l v8(US $3,500.00)
Ford f-250 2005 fx supercab
2007 ford f-250 super duty xlt extended cab pickup 4-door 6.0l(US $9,500.00)
Auto Services in Pennsylvania
Walburn Auto Svc ★★★★★
Vans Auto Repair ★★★★★
United Automotive Service Center LLC ★★★★★
Tomsic Motor Co ★★★★★
Team One Auto Group ★★★★★
Suburban Collision Specs Inc ★★★★★
Auto blog
2015 Ford Mustang already under recall, but just 53 units
Sun, 19 Oct 2014Ford has issued a small - but significant - recall for one of its spotlight cars: the 2015 Mustang.
The recall affects just 53 cars, with 50 in the United States and three in Canada. Ford said the passenger side safety belt buckle tension sensor may not have been calibrated properly by the supplier. This could lead to "misclassification" of the passenger seat occupant, and could cause the airbag to deploy improperly.
A Ford spokesperson didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. In a statement, the automaker said it is not aware of any accidents or injuries, and dealers will replace the buckle assembly at no cost to customers. The cars affected were built at Flat Rock Assembly Plant in Michigan from Aug. 18 to Oct. 2.
Ford, Samsung shack up to bring regen braking to non-hybrid models [w/video]
Mon, 09 Jun 2014Ford must be desperate to get itself ready for the beach this summer because it is really trying to get into shape. Shortly after unveiling the Lightweight Concept that cut the weight of a Fusion down to that of a Fiesta, it's now the rest of the line's turn for improvement. The company is wrapping up a 10-year research project aimed at developing next-gen automotive batteries to improve efficiency.
Ford claims that 70 percent of its lineup will have stop/start tech by 2017. The key to this massive proliferation is its new dual-battery system that combines a lithium-ion battery with a lead-acid one and regenerative braking. The setup works by harvesting braking energy and converting it to electricity. When the vehicle stops, the engine shuts off, but the Li-ion battery has enough juice to keep the accessories running. The engine starts up again as drivers take their foot off the brake. The layout would mean less wasted gas while idling. It's already available on Ford hybrids and is somewhat similar to the i-Eloop capacitor-based system from Mazda.
The bigger challenge is tuning the regenerative braking right. While hybrid drivers may be a little more adventurous, when it comes to getting a hang of regen braking, conventional buyers might not be so open-minded. The systems have a tendency to be a little grabby at first and then taper off at very low speeds. Ford needs to make sure it's just right to avoid turning off buyers.
Nuclear-powered concept cars from the Atomic Age
Thu, 17 Jul 2014In the 1950s and early 60s, the dawn of nuclear power was supposed to lead to a limitless consumer culture, a world of flying cars and autonomous kitchens all powered by clean energy. In Europe, it offered the then-limping continent a cheap, inexhaustible supply of power after years of rationing and infrastructure damage brought on by two World Wars.
The development of nuclear-powered submarines and ships during the 1940s and 50s led car designers to begin conceptualizing atomic vehicles. Fueled by a consistent reaction, these cars would theoretically produce no harmful byproducts and rarely need to refuel. Combining these vehicles with the new interstate system presented amazing potential for American mobility.
But the fantasy soon faded. There were just too many problems with the realities of nuclear power. For starters, the powerplant would be too small to attain a reaction unless the car contained weapons-grade atomic materials. Doing so would mean every fender-bender could result in a minor nuclear holocaust. Additionally, many of the designers assumed a lightweight shielding material or even forcefields would eventually be invented (they still haven't) to protect passengers from harmful radiation. Analyses of the atomic car concept at the time determined that a 50-ton lead barrier would be necessary to prevent exposure.