Ford: F-150 F-150 Xlt Stepside on 2040-cars
Old Forge, Pennsylvania, United States
If you have any other questions : darwingloria98f@netzero.com
1997 FORD F-150 XLT STEPSIDE PICK-UP RARE GLAVAL PACKAGE, DARK TOREADO RED METALLIC WITH FACTORY CUSTOM PAINT SCHEME/GRAY LEATHER INT. SVT RIMS W/PIRELLI'S, 5.4L TRITON V-8, ONLY 11K MILES ACTUAL MILES, AUTO, AC, POWER PACKAGE, SHOW OR GO. 1997 Ford F-150 XLT Stepside pick-up with rare Factory Custom package by GLaval Corp with Gray leather interior kept in pristine condition with only low 11,861 actual miles. It has a clean 2 owner history. If you have been searching for an immaculate F-150 here are a few details. The Details; The body is striking in appearance. The factory paint color scheme is outstanding. The special Ford factory paint codes used are shown on the sticker which is located in the drivers door jam (see pix). It has always been climate control garage kept since day one. It also has a unique factory hood as part of the package, upgraded Ford SVT wheels with Pirelli Radial tires, side steps and more.
Ford F-150 for Sale
Ford: f-150 harley-davidson edition crew cab picku(US $9,700.00)
2013 ford f-150 xlt(US $13,000.00)
Ford: f-150 xlt(US $27,500.00)
Ford: f-150 fx4 crew cab pickup 4-door(US $23,000.00)
Ford: f-150 xlt extended cab pickup 4-door(US $14,500.00)
Ford: f-150 platinum(US $9,000.00)
Auto Services in Pennsylvania
Young`s Auto Body Inc ★★★★★
Van Gorden`s Tire & Lube ★★★★★
Valley Seat Cover Center ★★★★★
Tony`s Transmission ★★★★★
Tire Ranch Auto Service Center ★★★★★
Thomas Automotive ★★★★★
Auto blog
EPA says fuel economy test for hybrids is accurate
Mon, 26 Aug 2013
The EPA says it stands behind its fuel economy test for hybrid vehicles following controversy about the testing process after Ford C-Max Hybrid customers and automotive journalists alike struggled to achieve 47 miles per gallon, the advertised mpg number, Automotive News reports. Ford responded to the issue almost two weeks ago by claiming that a 1970s-era EPA general label rule was responsible for the inaccurate mileage numbers, rerating the C-Max Hybrid's mpg numbers and offering customers rebates. Ford later said it didn't overstate the C-Max Hybrid's fuel economy and that it was surprised by the low numbers.
Ford technically didn't do anything wrong because it was following the general label rule, but agency regulator Christopher Grundler says the automaker was exploiting a loophole when it came up with the hybrid C-Max numbers, and that the testing process remains accurate. The general label rule allows vehicles that use the same engine and transmission and are in the same weight class to share fuel economy numbers, but it doesn't take into account other factors such as aerodynamic efficiency, which affects hybrids more drastically than non-hybrid vehicles. Ford originally used the Fusion Hybrid economy figures for the C-Max Hybrid and claimed the engineers didn't realize that its aerodynamic efficiency would affect fuel economy as much as it did.
Ford Mustang to get four-cylinder in Europe, but not US
Thu, 07 Mar 2013Fans of the Ford Mustang SVO, which was produced from 1884 through 1986 with a turbocharged 2.3-liter four-cylinder engine and a manual transmission, may be interested to know that Ford is reportedly going to introduce something similar for 2015. But don't get too excited if you live in the US, as Edmunds reports that the vehicle will be offered in Europe only. Boo!
According to the report, Ford will put a version of its EcoBoost turbocharged four-cylinder into the engine bay of the Mustang. The engine would be enlarged from its current 2.0 liters to 2.3 liters, taking horsepower from 252 to around 300. The well-known 5.0 V8 engine will also be available in Europe.
"The Mustang is uniquely Ford and has a huge fan base here in Europe. Now those fans have something to look forward to and we look forward to providing more details in the near future," says Ford of Europe CEO Stephen Odell. That's great... but why not offer buyers in the States the (likely) fuel-efficient turbo option, too?
Tier 1 suppliers call GM the worst OEM to work with
Mon, 12 May 2014Among automakers with a big US presence, General Motors is the worst to work for, according to a new survey from Tier 1 automotive suppliers, conducted by Planning Perspectives, Inc.
The Detroit-based manufacturer, which has been under fire following the ignition switch recall and its accompanying scandal, finished behind six other automakers with big US manufacturing operations. Suppliers had issues with trust and communications, as well as intellectual property protection. GM was also the least likely to allow suppliers to raise their prices in the face of unexpected increases in material cost, all of which contributed to 55 percent of suppliers saying their relationship with GM was "poor to very poor."
GM's cross-town competitors didn't fare much better. Chrysler finished in fifth place, ahead of GM and behind Dearborn-based Ford, which was passed for third place this year by Nissan. Toyota took the top marks, while Honda captured second place.




