Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2014 Ford F150 Xl on 2040-cars

US $27,080.00
Year:2014 Mileage:8 Color: Oxford White /
 Steel Gray
Location:

807 Southwest Blvd, Jefferson City, Missouri, United States

807 Southwest Blvd, Jefferson City, Missouri, United States
Advertising:
Fuel Type:Gasoline
Engine:3.7L V6 24V MPFI DOHC
Transmission:6-Speed Automatic
Condition: New
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1FTMF1CM8EKE69904
Stock Num: 141058
Make: Ford
Model: F150 XL
Year: 2014
Exterior Color: Oxford White
Interior Color: Steel Gray
Options:
  • 1st row curtain head airbags
  • 2 Door
  • 4-wheel ABS Brakes
  • ABS and Driveline Traction Control
  • Auxilliary transmission cooler
  • Clock: In-radio display
  • Coil front spring
  • Cupholders: Front
  • Diameter of tires: 17.0"
  • Door pockets: Driver and passenger
  • Door reinforcement: Side-impact door beam
  • Double wishbone front suspension
  • Engine immobilizer
  • Fixed antenna
  • Front Head Room: 41.0"
  • Front Hip Room: 60.5"
  • Front Independent Suspension
  • Front Leg Room: 41.4"
  • Front Shoulder Room: 65.9"
  • Front split-bench
  • Front suspension stabilizer bar
  • Front Ventilated disc brakes
  • Fuel Capacity: 26.0 gal.
  • Fuel Consumption: City: 17 mpg
  • Fuel Consumption: Highway: 23 mpg
  • Fuel Type: Regular unleaded
  • Independent front suspension classification
  • Instrumentation: Low fuel level
  • Leaf rear spring
  • Leaf rear suspension
  • Manual front air conditioning
  • Max cargo capacity: 17 cu.ft.
  • Overall Width: 79.2"
  • Passenger Airbag
  • Rear door type: Tailgate
  • Regular front stabilizer bar
  • Rigid axle rear suspension
  • Seatbelt pretensioners: Front
  • Side airbag
  • Spare Tire Mount Location: Underbody w/crankdown
  • Speed-proportional electric power steering
  • Stability control with anti-roll control
  • Steel spare wheel rim
  • Suspension class: Regular
  • Tachometer
  • Tilt-adjustable steering wheel
  • Tire Pressure Monitoring System
  • Tires: Prefix: P
  • Tires: Profile: 75
  • Tires: Speed Rating: S
  • Tires: Width: 235 mm
  • Total Number of Speakers: 4
  • Transmission hill holder
  • Two 12V DC power outlets
  • Type of tires: AT
  • Urethane shift knob trim
  • Urethane steering wheel trim
  • Variable intermittent front wipers
  • Vehicle Emissions: Federal
  • Wheel Diameter: 17
  • Wheel Width: 7.5
Drive Type: RWD
Number of Doors: 2 Doors
Mileage: 8

Auto Services in Missouri

Total Tinting & Total Customs ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Truck Accessories, Window Tinting
Address: 796 Hoff Rd, Saint-Paul
Phone: (636) 474-8468

The Auto Body Shop Inc. ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Insurance
Address: 6665 Center Grove Rd, West-Alton
Phone: (618) 656-6545

Tanners Paint And Body ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Dent Removal
Address: 2070 E Pythian St, Verona
Phone: (417) 865-4385

Tac Transmissions & Custom Exhaust ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Transmission, Mufflers & Exhaust Systems
Address: 320 S Bernhardt Ave, Gerald
Phone: (573) 764-5540

Square Deal Transmission ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Transmission
Address: 9725 Manchester Rd, Saint-Ann
Phone: (314) 968-7500

Sports Car Centre Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair, Emissions Inspection Stations
Address: 1866 Larkin Williams Rd, Valley-Park
Phone: (636) 343-8363

Auto blog

Question of the Day: Most degraded car name?

Fri, May 27 2016

When Ford came up with a not-so-sporty version of the Pinto and slapped Mustang badges on it in 1974, that was a low point for the Mustang name. When Chrysler applied the venerable Town & Country name on perfectly functional but unglamorous minivans, it saddened many of us. But perhaps the biggest demotion for a once-proud model came when, in 1988, General Motors imported a misery-enhancing Daewoo from Korea and called it the Pontiac LeMans. The original Pontiac LeMans was a great-looking midsize car with fairly advanced (for the time) suspension design and engine options including potent V8s and a screaming overhead-cam straight-six. The Daewoo-based Pontiac LeMans was a cramped, shoddy hooptie that served only to ruin the LeMans name forever, while stealing sales from the Suzuki-based Chevrolet Sprint. Sure, using the once-respected Monterey name on the Mercurized Ford Freestar was bad, but Mercury didn't have long to live at that point. I say the downward spiral of the LeMans name was the most agonizing in automotive history. What do you think? Related Video: This content is hosted by a third party. To view it, please update your privacy preferences. Manage Settings. Auto News Ford Mercury Pontiac Automotive History Classics questions ford pinto names

Lexus tops JD Power Vehicle Dependability Study again, Buick bests Toyota

Wed, Feb 25 2015

It shouldn't surprise anyone, but Lexus has once again taken the top spot in JD Power's Vehicle Dependability Study. That'd be the Japanese luxury brand's fourth straight year at the top of table. The big news, though, is the rise of Buick. General Motor's near-premium brand beat out Toyota to take second place, with 110 problems per 100 vehicles compared to Toyota's 111 problems. Lexus owners only reported 89 problems per 100 vehicles. Besides Buick's three-position jump, Scion enjoyed a major improvement, jumping 13 positions from 2014. Ram and Mitsubishi made big gains, as well, moving up 11 and 10 positions, respectively. In terms of individual segments, GM and Toyota both excelled, taking home seven segment awards each. The study wasn't good news for all involved, though. A number of popular automakers finished below the industry average of 147 problems per 100 vehicles, including Subaru, (157PP100), Volkswagen (165PP100), Ford/Hyundai (188PP100 each) and Mini (193PP100). The biggest losers (by a tremendous margin, we might add) were Land Rover and Fiat, recording 258 and 273 problems per 100 vehicles. The next closest brand was Jeep, with 197PP100. While the Vehicle Dependability Study uses the same measurement system as the Initial Quality Survey, the two metrics analyze very different things. The VDS looks at problems experienced by original owners of model year 2012 vehicles over the past 12 months, while the oft-quoted IQS focuses on problems in the first 90 days of new-vehicle ownership. Like the IQS, though, the VDS has a rather broad definition of what a problem is. Because of that, a low score from JD Power is no guarantee of extreme unreliability, so much as just poor design. In this most recent study, the two most reported problems focused on Bluetooth connectivity and the voice-command systems. The former leaves plenty of room for user error due to poor design (particularly true of the Bluetooth systems on the low-scoring Fords, Volkswagens and Subarus), while the second is something JD Power has already confirmed as being universally terrible. That makes means that while these studies are important, they shouldn't be taken as gospel when it comes to automotive reliability. News Source: JD PowerImage Credit: Copyright 2015 Jeremy Korzeniewski / AOL Buick Fiat Ford GM Hyundai Jeep Land Rover Lexus MINI Mitsubishi RAM Scion Subaru Toyota Volkswagen Auto Repair Ownership study

Consumer Reports declares most and least loved cars [w/video]

Wed, Dec 3 2014

Consumer Reports is crunching the numbers from its annual owner-satisfaction survey, and part of that process is finding out how attached drivers are to their cars. CR simply asks readers of models up to three years old if they would buy the same vehicle again in light of their entire ownership experience, and tallies the results. After looking at the responses for about 350,000 vehicles, it turns out that people really love a certain California-built, electrically powered luxury sedan. That's right, this year's the overall winner was the Tesla Model S with a whopping 98 percent of owners saying they would purchase another one (the Model S also won this award last year, with 99 percent satisfaction). The Chevrolet Corvette Stingray came in a close second with 95 percent of drivers hoping to park another one in their garage. A few models weren't quite so favored, though. The Nissan Versa Sedan was the least loved model among its owners; a mere 42 percent said that they would purchase another. The aging Jeep Compass didn't do much better, with just 43 percent of drivers willing to buy the softroader again. On average, about 70 percent of owners say they would buy their car again, and only four cars ranked below 50 percent in CR's findings. Check out the video above to see some of the winners and losers in a few of CR's categories. If you're a subscriber, you can check out the full list on its website. Related Gallery Consumer Reports Most Loved Cars 2014 Related Gallery Consumer Reports Least Loved Cars 2014 News Source: Consumer Reports - sub. req., Consumer Reports via YouTube Chevrolet Ford Mazda Mercedes-Benz Porsche Subaru Tesla Ownership Videos car ownership