Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2014 Ford F150 King Ranch on 2040-cars

US $54,525.00
Year:2014 Mileage:8 Color: White Metallic /
 Pale Adobe
Location:

807 Southwest Blvd, Jefferson City, Missouri, United States

807 Southwest Blvd, Jefferson City, Missouri, United States
Advertising:
Fuel Type:Gasoline
Engine:3.5L V6 24V GDI DOHC Twin Turbo
Transmission:6-Speed Automatic
Condition: New
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1FTFW1ET4EKE00186
Stock Num: 140858
Make: Ford
Model: F150 King Ranch
Year: 2014
Exterior Color: White Metallic
Interior Color: Pale Adobe
Options:
  • 1st and 2nd row curtain head airbags
  • 4 Door
  • 4-wheel ABS Brakes
  • ABS and Driveline Traction Control
  • Anti-theft alarm system
  • Automatic locking hubs
  • Clock: In-radio display
  • Coil front spring
  • Cupholders: Front and rear
  • Door pockets: Driver
  • Door reinforcement: Side-impact door beam
  • Double wishbone front suspension
  • Engine immobilizer
  • Fixed antenna
  • Fold-up cushion rear seats
  • Front Head Room: 41.0"
  • Front Hip Room: 60.5"
  • Front Independent Suspension
  • Front Leg Room: 41.4"
  • Front Shoulder Room: 65.9"
  • Front suspension stabilizer bar
  • Front Ventilated disc brakes
  • Fuel Capacity: 36.0 gal.
  • Fuel Type: Regular unleaded
  • Independent front suspension classification
  • Instrumentation: Low fuel level
  • Leaf rear spring
  • Leaf rear suspension
  • Left rear passenger door type: Conventional
  • Max cargo capacity: 60 cu.ft.
  • Overall Width: 79.2"
  • Passenger Airbag
  • passenger and rear
  • Power remote driver mirror adjustment
  • Power remote passenger mirror adjustment
  • Power windows
  • Rear center seatbelt: 3-point belt
  • Rear door type: Tailgate
  • Rear Head Room: 40.3"
  • Rear Hip Room: 64.6"
  • Rear Leg Room: 43.5"
  • Rear Shoulder Room: 65.5"
  • Regular front stabilizer bar
  • Remote activated exterior entry lights
  • Right rear passenger door type: Conventional
  • Rigid axle rear suspension
  • Seatbelt pretensioners: Front
  • Side airbag
  • Spare Tire Mount Location: Underbody w/crankdown
  • Speed-proportional electric power steering
  • Split rear bench
  • Stability control with anti-roll control
  • Steel spare wheel rim
  • Tachometer
  • Three 12V DC power outlets
  • Tire Pressure Monitoring System
  • Tires: Prefix: P
  • Tires: Speed Rating: S
  • Transmission hill holder
  • Variable intermittent front wipers
Drive Type: 4WD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 8

Auto Services in Missouri

Xpert Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 2818 Forest Ridge Ln, Westphalia
Phone: (573) 638-2666

Wrench Teach GV ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 315 S Main St, Grain-Valley
Phone: (816) 847-7117

Twin City Toyota ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 301 Autumn Ridge Dr, Mapaville
Phone: (636) 931-0555

Trux Unlimited Inc ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers
Address: 1015 S Bethany St, Sugar-Creek
Phone: (816) 463-9907

The Tint Shop ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Window Tinting, Glass Coating & Tinting
Address: 53 Norwood Trailer Ct, Washington
Phone: (636) 390-8828

The Automotive Shop of Melbourne ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 1152 E Main St, Jefferson-Cty
Phone: (870) 368-3133

Auto blog

2016 Tech of the Year | Autoblog Minute

Thu, Oct 29 2015

Deliberation on the winners of Autoblog's Tech of the Year Award is under way. Nominees for best car in 2016 are: the Tesla Model S, the Chevy Volt and the BMW 7 series. Nominees for best tech in 2016 are: Apple CarPlay, Android Auto, VW's MiB II with AppConnect, Ford Sync 3, Audi Virtual Cockpit, the Smart Cross Connect App, and Volvo Sensus. Autoblog's Chris McGraw reports on this edition of Autoblog Minute. Audi BMW Chevrolet Ford smart Tesla Volvo Technology of the Year Autoblog Minute Videos Original Video volt android auto ford sync 3

Lexus tops JD Power Vehicle Dependability Study again, Buick bests Toyota

Wed, Feb 25 2015

It shouldn't surprise anyone, but Lexus has once again taken the top spot in JD Power's Vehicle Dependability Study. That'd be the Japanese luxury brand's fourth straight year at the top of table. The big news, though, is the rise of Buick. General Motor's near-premium brand beat out Toyota to take second place, with 110 problems per 100 vehicles compared to Toyota's 111 problems. Lexus owners only reported 89 problems per 100 vehicles. Besides Buick's three-position jump, Scion enjoyed a major improvement, jumping 13 positions from 2014. Ram and Mitsubishi made big gains, as well, moving up 11 and 10 positions, respectively. In terms of individual segments, GM and Toyota both excelled, taking home seven segment awards each. The study wasn't good news for all involved, though. A number of popular automakers finished below the industry average of 147 problems per 100 vehicles, including Subaru, (157PP100), Volkswagen (165PP100), Ford/Hyundai (188PP100 each) and Mini (193PP100). The biggest losers (by a tremendous margin, we might add) were Land Rover and Fiat, recording 258 and 273 problems per 100 vehicles. The next closest brand was Jeep, with 197PP100. While the Vehicle Dependability Study uses the same measurement system as the Initial Quality Survey, the two metrics analyze very different things. The VDS looks at problems experienced by original owners of model year 2012 vehicles over the past 12 months, while the oft-quoted IQS focuses on problems in the first 90 days of new-vehicle ownership. Like the IQS, though, the VDS has a rather broad definition of what a problem is. Because of that, a low score from JD Power is no guarantee of extreme unreliability, so much as just poor design. In this most recent study, the two most reported problems focused on Bluetooth connectivity and the voice-command systems. The former leaves plenty of room for user error due to poor design (particularly true of the Bluetooth systems on the low-scoring Fords, Volkswagens and Subarus), while the second is something JD Power has already confirmed as being universally terrible. That makes means that while these studies are important, they shouldn't be taken as gospel when it comes to automotive reliability. News Source: JD PowerImage Credit: Copyright 2015 Jeremy Korzeniewski / AOL Buick Fiat Ford GM Hyundai Jeep Land Rover Lexus MINI Mitsubishi RAM Scion Subaru Toyota Volkswagen Auto Repair Ownership study

The 1965 Ford Mustang could have looked a lot different

Fri, May 8 2020

The 1965 Ford Mustang is unquestionably an automotive design icon, and nearly every generation of Mustang has some connection to that original car. Because it's such a universally-known vehicle, we were amazed to see all the different designs that were being considered. Head of Ford's archives Ted Ryan recently shared photos of design proposals for the original Mustang on Twitter that he and Jamie Myler found, and we reached out to them to find out more. As Ryan initially noted, the photos were taken on August 19, 1962, and they are proposals for the Ford Mustang. Apparently Ford had committed to doing a Falcon-based youth-oriented car at this point, and it did have plans to launch the car in 1964 for the 1965 model year. But after having little success with early design proposals, the company asked all of its design studios — the Advanced Studio, Lincoln-Mercury Studio and Ford Studio — to submit proposals. With only about two years before the planned launch, Ford was understandably short on time, and it's believed that the studios only had a month to create and present these designs. Lincoln-Mercury design proposal View 8 Photos The majority of the designs, a total of five, came from the Advanced Studio, and part of this was because they already had a couple of concept designs in reserve it could present. Two other models representing three design possibilities came from Lincoln-Mercury, and just one model with two options came from Ford. The Advanced Studio proposals are shown in the gallery at the very top of this article, and the Lincoln-Mercury and Ford proposals are in the gallery directly above this paragraph. The Advanced Studio's most radical design is the one that was clearly related to the Mustang I concept that would be shown later that year with huge wraparound rear glass, turbine-inspired bumpers and enormous side scoops. The other proposals from the studio were more conservative, featuring simple lines, grilles reminiscent of the Falcon, and one even borrowing the jet-thruster-style taillights made famous on the Thunderbird. Lincoln-Mercury had some impressively bold designs, particularly its fastback that had buttresses to extend the shape all the way to the tail. This car had two different side trim possibilities. The other Lincoln-Mercury design was toned down a bit, but had two interesting possibilities for side detailing, as well as some crisp, low-profile tail fins.