2014 Ford F150 201a on 2040-cars
1075 W Terra Ln, O Fallon, Missouri, United States
Engine:3.7L V6 24V MPFI DOHC
Transmission:6-Speed Automatic
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1FTMF1CM3EKE38611
Stock Num: T4537
Make: Ford
Model: F150 201A
Year: 2014
Exterior Color: Tuxedo Black Metallic
Interior Color: Steel Gray
Options: Drive Type: RWD
Number of Doors: 2 Doors
Mileage: 8
We make all reasonable efforts to keep our inventory and pricing accurate, but please contact Matt Trudell at 866-250-1600 with any price questions Welcome to Marshall Ford! Located in O'Fallon, MO, Marshall Ford is proud to be one of the premier dealerships in the area. From the moment you walk into our showroom, you'll know our commitment to Customer Service is second to none. We strive to make your experience with Marshall Ford a great one for the life of your vehicle.Call 866-250-1600 for your No-Obligation Internet Price Quote.
Ford F-150 for Sale
2014 ford f150 xlt(US $36,310.00)
2014 ford f150 xlt(US $40,315.00)
2014 ford f150 302a(US $40,615.00)
2014 ford f150 201a(US $40,620.00)
2014 ford f150 xlt(US $40,710.00)
2014 ford f150 xlt(US $43,810.00)
Auto Services in Missouri
Xpert Auto Service ★★★★★
Wrench Teach GV ★★★★★
Twin City Toyota ★★★★★
Trux Unlimited Inc ★★★★★
The Tint Shop ★★★★★
The Automotive Shop of Melbourne ★★★★★
Auto blog
New Chevy ad suggests truck war is alive and well | Autoblog Minute
Sat, Jun 11 2016Senior Editor Greg Migliore discusses Range Rover spy shots, Faraday Future's new executive hire, and the Chevy-Ford truck war. Ferrari Ford SUV Autoblog Minute Videos Original Video transportation faraday future marco mattiacci
Our love of SUVs is killing people in the streets
Tue, Jul 17 2018Americans are fond of supersized fast-food meals and colossal convenience-store fountain drinks, even though they're clearly bad for our health and U.S. adults keep getting fatter. We also like large vehicles, and our love affair with SUVs is killing people in the streets. According to a recent investigation by the Detroit Free Press/USA Today, the increase in SUV sales over the past several years coincides with a sharp rise in pedestrian deaths in the U.S. — up 46 percent since 2009, with nearly 6,000 people killed in 2016 alone. With SUV sales surpassing sedans in 2014 and pickups and SUVs currently accounting for 60 percent of new vehicle sales, it's no wonder Ford announced in April plans to cease U.S. sales of almost all passenger cars. And this followed Fiat Chrysler's move to virtually an all-truck, -SUV and -crossover lineup. While the Freep/USA Today investigation found that the simultaneous surge in SUV sales and pedestrian deaths comes down to vehicle size, it also points to a lack of action on the part of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), even though it knew of the dangers SUVs pose to pedestrians. Also blamed are automakers dragging their feet on implementing active safety features. Using federal accident data, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) determined that there was an 81 percent increase in single-vehicle pedestrian fatalities involving SUVs between 2009 and 2016. Freep/USA Today's analysis of the same data by counting vehicles that struck and killed pedestrians instead of the number of people killed showed a 69 percent increase in SUV involvement. As far back as 2001, researchers at Rowan University forecasted a rise in pedestrian deaths as Americans began switching to SUVs. "In the United States, passenger vehicles are shifting from a fleet populated primarily by cars to a fleet dominated by light trucks and vans," the researchers wrote, with light trucks comprising SUVs.
EPA says fuel economy test for hybrids is accurate
Mon, 26 Aug 2013
The EPA says it stands behind its fuel economy test for hybrid vehicles following controversy about the testing process after Ford C-Max Hybrid customers and automotive journalists alike struggled to achieve 47 miles per gallon, the advertised mpg number, Automotive News reports. Ford responded to the issue almost two weeks ago by claiming that a 1970s-era EPA general label rule was responsible for the inaccurate mileage numbers, rerating the C-Max Hybrid's mpg numbers and offering customers rebates. Ford later said it didn't overstate the C-Max Hybrid's fuel economy and that it was surprised by the low numbers.
Ford technically didn't do anything wrong because it was following the general label rule, but agency regulator Christopher Grundler says the automaker was exploiting a loophole when it came up with the hybrid C-Max numbers, and that the testing process remains accurate. The general label rule allows vehicles that use the same engine and transmission and are in the same weight class to share fuel economy numbers, but it doesn't take into account other factors such as aerodynamic efficiency, which affects hybrids more drastically than non-hybrid vehicles. Ford originally used the Fusion Hybrid economy figures for the C-Max Hybrid and claimed the engineers didn't realize that its aerodynamic efficiency would affect fuel economy as much as it did.









