Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2002 Ford F-150 Svt Lightning on 2040-cars

US $7,000.00
Year:2002 Mileage:8448 Color: Purple
Location:

Grandin, North Dakota, United States

Grandin, North Dakota, United States
Advertising:

2002 FORD F-150 SVT LIGHTNING 8,448 Original Miles 682 of 4726 '02 Lightnings and 1 of only 1130 "TRUE BLUE" 2nd Owner - Never Smoked in Garage Kept Featured in 2 magazine articles: Ford Truck World 27 and Trucks magazine 25 Subtle set of custom painted Chameleon Flames - LEER locking tonneau cover with wing painted True Blue to match Full bedrug 22" Chrome Rims w/285-30 Goodyear Wrangler tires - also includes 1 extra rim MAC Air Intake and magnaflow exhaust This is a brand new 2002 truck looking for a NEW HOME.

Auto Services in North Dakota

O`Reilly Auto Parts ★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: 1570 32nd Ave S, Hickson
Phone: (866) 595-6470

Johnson Oil Inc. ★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: 502 Atlantic Ave S, Joliette
Phone: (866) 595-6470

Berg Auto Supply West ★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: 3239 39th St S, Wild-Rice
Phone: (866) 595-6470

Aberle Fix IT Shop ★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 108 5th Ave, Monango
Phone: (866) 595-6470

Harley`s Automotive Center ★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube, Truck Service & Repair
Address: 1514 2nd Ave SW, Burlington
Phone: (888) 890-6111

Gem City Motor Co ★★★

New Car Dealers, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: 310 2nd Ave NE, Trotters
Phone: (406) 433-2729

Auto blog

Should heavy-duty pickup trucks have window stickers with fuel mileage estimates?

Sat, Sep 23 2017

If you were to stroll into your nearest Chevrolet, Ford, GMC, Nissan, or Ram dealership, you'd find a bunch of pickup trucks. Most of those would have proper window stickers labeled with things like base prices, options prices, location of manufacture, and, crucially, fuel economy estimates. But you'd also run across a number of heavy-duty trucks with no such fuel mileage data from the Environmental Protection Agency. The EPA doesn't require automakers to publish the valuable miles-per-gallon measurement for vehicles with gross weight ratings that exceed 8,500 pounds. That makes it difficult for consumers to compare behemoths powered by turbocharged diesel engines – between one another, and between smaller, gasoline-fueled trucks. Consumer Reports doesn't think it should be this way, and it's spearheading an effort (PDF link) to get the government to require manufacturers to publish fuel economy estimates. In its own testing, CR found that heavy-duty pickups powered by Ford's Power Stroke, GM's Duramax, and FCA's Cummins diesel engines (which doesn't include the Ram's EcoDiesel) get worse fuel mileage than their lighter-duty gas-powered siblings. We're not so sure HD-truck buyers are unaware of this fact – big diesels don't really come into their own until big loads are placed in their beds or attached to their trailer hitches. Under heavy workloads, the diesel trucks will almost certainly return greater efficiency than a similar gas-powered truck. What's more, HD trucks with lumbering diesels in general make the driver feel more confident while towing due to greater torque at low engine RPM than gas trucks. They also offer greater max-weight limits. Still, we agree EPA fuel mileage estimates should be offered for heavy-duty pickups. And we think the comparisons provided by Consumer Reports might be interesting to potential buyers. Click here to see the results of CR's tests, and let us know what you think using the poll below. Related Video: Featured Gallery 2017 Ford F-Series Super Duty: First Drive View 22 Photos News Source: Consumer Reports Government/Legal Green Read This Chevrolet Ford GMC Nissan RAM Fuel Efficiency Truck Commercial Vehicles Diesel Vehicles poll gmc sierra hd chevy silverado hd

Ford recalls 83k Taurus and crossover models for halfshaft issue

Fri, 15 Aug 2014

Ford and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration have issued a recall for some 83,250 vehicles in the US, for an issue with halfshafts. More specifically a "halfshaft retention circlip" might not have been properly installed on affected vehicles, with the result being halfshafts that may move improperly or disengage completely from the linkshaft while driving. The NHTSA release also notes that the issue may occur "without prior warning" which obviously factors in to the timeliness of getting this checked.
Should the halfshaft disengage, a few troubling things could happen. If it occurs while driving, power from the engine will no longer be transmitted to the wheels. And, if the vehicle is parked without the parking brake applied after disengagement of the circlip, vehicles may roll away even if they're transmissions have been placed in "Park."
Affected vehicles are as follows: Ford Edge and Lincoln MKX crossovers from model years 2012 to 2014; Ford Taurus and Lincoln MKS sedans from model years 2013 to 2014; Ford Flex and Lincoln MKT vehicles from model years 2013 to 2014.

American automakers fall in latest Fortune 500 rankings

Fri, 10 May 2013

Not that it means anything beyond bragging rights, but if you're fixated on the positions of domestic automakers on the annual Fortune 500 list, both General Motors and Ford are still on it but they've slipped a couple of notches. The list ranks American companies and they're ordered solely by revenue. GM, fifth last year, came in seventh, while Ford fell from ninth to tenth even though both companies saw small gains in annual revenue.
GM's $152.3 billion in revenue was less than a third of that of the first company on the list: Wal-Mart, which regained the title from Exxon Mobil. Berkshire Hathaway and Apple are the firms that moved GM down. Ford, displaced by energy company Valero, had $134.3 billion in revenue.
On a side note, profitability isn't a factor, but both GM and Ford were down in this year's list compared to last year's: GM declined from $9.2 billion to $6.2 billion, Ford fell from $20.2 billion to $5.6 billion. If profits were included, Exxon Mobil would probably still be king: although the energy company made almost $20 billion less in revenue than Wal-Mart's $469.2 billion, it posted $44.9 billion in profit compared to Wal-Mart's $17 billion.