Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1994 Ford F-150 Xl In-line 6 4.9l New Paint Ladder Rack on 2040-cars

US $3,500.00
Year:1994 Mileage:149000 Color: White /
 Gray
Location:

Delmar, Maryland, United States

Delmar, Maryland, United States
Advertising:
Fuel Type:GAS
For Sale By:Private Seller
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Standard Cab Pickup
Engine:4.9L 300Cu. In. l6 GAS OHV Naturally Aspirated
Vehicle Title:Salvage
VIN: 1FTDF15Y7RNA01425 Make: Ford
Options: Cassette Player
Model: F-150
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag
Mileage: 149,000
Power Options: Air Conditioning
Sub Model: XL
Exterior Color: White
Interior Color: Gray
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Number of Cylinders: 6
Year: 1994
Trim: XL Standard Cab Pickup 2-Door
Drive Type: RWD
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

1994 Ford f-150 2wd regular cab long bed, Kargo masters ladder rack, diamond plate bed rails, rubber bed mat, A/C cassette with i-pod connection, new radiator, new alternator, new a/c compressor, top end rebuild at 105K, tinted windows, sliding rear window. The truck was bought brand new by my father-inlaw in 1994. I got the truck 7 years ago. I got caught in a hail storm 4 years ago and the truck was totaled as they estimated $5400 in hail damage. I spent $3000 having the truck completely repainted and restored by a friend on the side. 4 years later the trucks paint looks new still and only has one spot of rust starting to come out by the rear driver's side wheel. Only other additional problem would be it will need tires soon other than that is is mechanically sound and ready for a new owner. I have the inspection papers where I had the truck inspected and the title listed as rebuilt and have a clear title for it now since the hail damage. Only selling because I just bought an extended cab truck to be able to carry all 4 of my children at one time. With the buy it now I will MD inspect and put newer tires on it if needed or I have a low reserve to move it quickly. Feel free to e-mail with any questions or call 410-251-7218. Thanks for looking, Jamie

Auto Services in Maryland

Wes Greenway`s Waldorf VW ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers
Address: 2282 Crain Hwy Waldorf, Md, Owings
Phone: (240) 205-7330

True 2 Form Collision Rep ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 1123 N Point Rd, Fort-Howard
Phone: (410) 284-2556

Souder`s Autowerks ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 205 Parks Rd, Chester
Phone: (410) 310-4326

SD Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Oil Refiners
Address: 1229B Generals Hwy, Odenton
Phone: (410) 923-6987

Sarandos Automotive Technology Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Engine Rebuilding
Address: 818 York Rd, Bentley-Springs
Phone: (866) 595-6470

Pensyl`s Body Shop ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 5550 Hyndman Rd, Ellerslie
Phone: (814) 842-6255

Auto blog

Ford made three big mistakes in calculating MPG for 2013 C-Max Hybrid

Tue, Jun 17 2014

It's been a rough time for the official fuel economy figures for the Ford C-Max Hybrid. When the car was released in 2012, Ford made a huge deal about how it would beat the Toyota Prius V, which was rated at 42 combined miles per gallon, 44 city and 40 highway. The Ford? 47 mpg across the board. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? Well, after hearing customer complaints and issuing a software update in mid-2013, then discovering a real problem with the numbers last fall and then making a big announcement last week that the fuel economy ratings of six different 2013 and 2014 model year vehicles would need to be lowered, the C-Max Hybrid has ended up at 40 combined, 42 city and 37 highway. In other words, the Prius trumps it, as daily drivers of those two vehicles have known for a long time. The changes will not only affect the window sticker, but also the effect that the C-Max Hybrid (and the five other Ford vehicles that had their fuel economy figures lowered last week) have on Ford's compliance with greenhouse gas and CAFE rules for model year 2013 and 2014. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? There are two technical answers to that question, which we've got below, as well as some context for how Ford's mistakes will play out in the bigger world of green vehicles. Let's start with Ford's second error, which is easy to do since we documented it in detail last year (the first, needing to do a software update, was also covered). The basic gist is that Ford used the general label rule (completely legally) to test the Fusion Hybrid and use those numbers to figure out how efficient the C-Max Hybrid is. That turned out to be a mistake, since the two vehicles are different enough that their numbers were not comparable, despite having the same engine, transmission and test weight, as the rules require. You can read more details here. Ford's Said Deep admitted that the TRLHP issue is completely separate from the general label error from last year. Now let's move on to last week's announcement. What's interesting is that the new recalculation of the MPG numbers – downward, of course – was caused by a completely separate issue, something called the Total Road Load Horsepower (TRLHP). Ford's Said Deep admitted to AutoblogGreen that the TRLHP issue had nothing to do with the general label error from last year.

Automakers tussle over owners of 'orphan' makes

Thu, 10 May 2012

When General Motors put down several of its brands in recent years, it also let loose thousands of brand-loyal customers who will eventually need another car.
R.L. Polk Associates estimates there are more than 18 million cars from 16 discontinued makes on the road today. Those "orphan owners" have sales-hungry competitors seeing dollar signs. GM is offering Saturn owners $1,000 cash toward a Chevy Cruze, Cadillac CTS or a GMC Acadia. Ford is giving its Mercury lease customers a chance to get out of their contracts with no early-termination penalty and offering to waive six remaining payments if they drive off in a Ford or Lincoln.
Edmunds.com research shows the efforts are paying off somewhat for GM, with 39 percent of Pontiac owners, 37 percent of Hummer owners and 31 percent of Saturn owners taking delivery of another GM-branded vehicle. But that leaves as much as 69 percent of owners going elsewhere. Ford, Honda and Toyota seem to be attracting many former GM owners.

Ford recalls 462,000 SUVs over faulty rear camera

Fri, Jan 27 2023

Ford has had some issues with its backup cameras in recent years, and the troubles are continuing with yet another recall announced today. In this recall, certain Ford and Lincoln vehicles equipped with the 360-degree parking camera could lose the rear-view camera feed. The newest recall affects some 462,000 vehicles worldwide, Reuters reports, including 382,759 in the U.S. under NHTSA recall 23V-022. The recall applies to the 2020-2023 Ford Explorer and Lincoln Aviator, as well as the 2020-2022 Lincoln Corsair. The remedy involves dealers updating the vehicles’ image processing module software free of charge. This latest issue expands a previous recall, and applies to vehicles that have already been serviced under recall 21V-735. Owners will be notified by mail around February 20, and owners can also contact Ford customer service at 1-866-436-7332. Ford told NHTSA that it first became aware in October 2021 of a small number of complaints of a blue screen from the rear camera feed on vehicles that had already been repaired. Ford worked with suppliers to track down the potential issue, and said warranty claims remained low until December 2022, when it started to see more claims for blue screens in vehicles produced after the last remedy, at which point Ford ordered a stop-ship on those vehicle lines. Ford said itÂ’s aware of 17 minor accident reports related to the issue, but no injuries. In addition to this recall, Ford has had other camera issues in the past few years that resulted in recalls. NHTSA recall 22V-151 applied to 2021-2022 Edge SUVs experiencing “a distorted, black and white, or discolored screen” when reversing. 2021-2022 Ford Broncos had an issue where the rear-view camera would remain on even after the vehicle was put back into a forward gear. Last year, Ford recalled 330,000 Mustangs for faulty cameras, as well as 277,000 Super Duty trucks over foggy rear-view cameras. In 2021, NHTSA opened an investigation into whether Ford was slow to recall more than 620,000 vehicles for faulty cameras. Recalls Ford Lincoln Safety Crossover SUV