Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2013 Ford Explorer Sport Sport Utility 4-door 3.5l on 2040-cars

Year:2013 Mileage:25650
Location:

Burton, Michigan, United States

Burton, Michigan, United States
2013 Ford Explorer Sport Sport Utility 4-Door 3.5L, image 1
Advertising:

I can't believe I am selling it already! Completely loaded with every option and extras. I paid close to 60k for it a year ago. I need a work truck for my business so the weekend car has to go. Weathertech super premium floor mats, rear cargo area cover, cargo mat for dirty or wet items, Transferable 7 year/ 120k mile factory extended warranty which was 4 grand for this twin turbo monster. 25k highway miles. remote start, push button start, door keypads, towing package with trailer brake controller up to 5k lbs, oil was changed every 3k even though it was not necessary going by the manufacturer spec. GREAT condition. The only thing is I had a stone chip on the windshield but it was professionally fixed -with lifetime warranty (passenger side)

Twin Turbo
Bliss
Rear Camera
Power Rear Hatch
Tow Package
Leather
Heated/Cooled Seats
110v Power Outlet
Navigation
Extended Warranty
TPMS
Dual Moonroof
Power Pedals -brake and gas
Adaptive Cruise
EVERY OPTION! E-mail if you think of one not listed. Rest assured, its on there.

Auto Services in Michigan

Van Buren Motor Supply Inc ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories, Brake Repair
Address: 109 E Michigan Ave, Lawrence
Phone: (269) 657-5534

Van 8 Collision ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 23670 Ryan Rd, Grosse-Pointe-Park
Phone: (586) 759-4424

Upholstery Barn ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Seat Covers, Tops & Upholstery, Automobile Accessories
Address: 3904 S Sheridan Dr, Grand-Haven
Phone: (231) 670-7753

United Auto & Collision ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 5133 Tireman St, Grosse-Pointe-Park
Phone: (313) 285-9031

Tuffy Auto Service Centers ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair
Address: 400 S Euclid Ave, Kawkawlin
Phone: (989) 686-6060

Superior Collision ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Restoration-Antique & Classic
Address: 611 S Maple Rd, Milan
Phone: (734) 994-8885

Auto blog

2020 Ford Explorer safer than old model; crash test ratings short of Top Safety Pick

Mon, Dec 16 2019

The 2020 Ford Explorer three-row crossover has improved on the outgoing model in many ways. According to the IIHS, it has also improved in a number of safety categories, but not enough to earn a Top Safety Pick award. The culprit is not the headlight performance for once. The Explorer's headlights were given an "Acceptable" rating, which would be sufficient for Top Safety Pick, if not Top Safety Pick +. Where the Ford falls short is in the front small overlap driver-side crash test, in which it got the second highest "Acceptable" rating. The IIHS requires a "Good" rating in this category, whereas an "Acceptable" rating on the passenger side would be, well, acceptable for Top Safety Pick. According to IIHS, Ford will be reviewing the results to figure out what the issue is, and it will likely make revisions to future Explorers to improve the result. Other than the one test, the Explorer performed admirably. It received a "Good" rating in all other crash categories except the passenger-side small overlap that was not tested. Both its standard and optional forward collision prevention systems had the highest "Superior" ratings, with the standard one preventing a collision with a car at speeds of up to 25 mph, and the optional one avoiding a collision at 12 mph, and "nearly" preventing one at 25 mph. Headlights are rated as "Acceptable" and so is access to child seat LATCH anchors. Also worth noting is that the Explorer's crash test ratings apply to its luxurious twin the 2020 Lincoln Aviator, meaning it also doesn't get a Top Safety Pick rating. The forward collision system performed the same as in the Ford, and the only difference between the two was in headlight performance. The Lincoln's standard headlights, included on the base, Reserve and Grand Touring trims, have the second-lowest "Marginal" rating, but the optional headlights for those trims, and the standard ones on the Black Label trim, received the "Good" rating. Among three-row Explorer competitors, the Honda Pilot, Hyundai Santa Fe XL, Kia Telluride, Nissan Pathfinder and Toyota Highlander all have a Top Safety Pick. The Hyundai Palisade, Mazda CX-9, Subaru Ascent, and the slightly smaller Kia Sorento and Volkswagen Tiguan all have a Top Safety Pick +. As for Lincoln Aviator competitors, the Cadillac XT6, Infiniti QX60, Lexus RX and Volvo XC90 get a Top Safety Pick. The Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class and two-row-only BMW X5 get the Top Safety Pick + rating. Related Video:      

Ford won't be releasing GT500 lap times for the 'Ring, or any other car

Wed, 27 Nov 2013

Trucks have towing capacity, EVs have driving range and performance cars have Nürburgring lap times. What do all three have in common? They should all be taken with a grain of salt. Currently, there is no sanctioned way to record lap times or verify production-spec cars - a lesson we recently learned with the 2015 Nissan GT-R Nismo - and until there is a way to do so (and there probably never will be), we'll never officially know the actual time it took for Ford to lap the 'Ring with its ultra-powerful Shelby GT500.
After posting a Ford-made video of a 2013 GT500 running around the 'Ring, the guys over at SVTPerformance.com (an enthusiasts forum not affiliated with Ford or SVT) wanted more answers. They got in touch with Ford's Global Performance Vehicle Chief Engineer Jamal Hameedi, who said until there is a way to verify the times and inspect the cars, Ford will not get involved with lap-time wars. In the email, Hameedi pointed out that the 'Ring is a useful tool in that it allows a wide spectrum of track conditions, but until there is a governed way to record times, there is no way to accurately compare cars head-to-head.
And as much as some may not like it, Hameedi speaks the truth. It really isn't possible to compare times from one car to another, unless those cars were lapping the same track at the same time with the same driver. Not that any of this means there won't be continuous wars by fans and manufacturers alike... in other words, feel free to voice your opinions in the Comments below.

2016 Ford Focus RS mule spotted on US soil

Tue, 17 Jun 2014

Okay Ford, this is what we like to see. One of our intrepid spy photographers has captured a vehicle that we weren't even sure would see the light of day - the next Focus RS. While this is pretty clearly a mule based on the current Focus ST, as our spy points out, there are a number of giveaways about this hot hatch's true nature.
Indication number one that all is not right with this Focus is the heavily camo'd front fascia, which has been completely reconfigured for duty on the RS. It boasts significantly larger grilles that are meant to accommodate what is likely the 2.3-liter, turbocharged four-cylinder that's destined for the 2015 Ford Mustang. Considering that, then, we can expect around 300 horsepower and 300 pound-feet of torque from the hottest of Foci, although it's entirely possible that the production model could climb even higher, to around 330 hp.
The front fascia tweaks are complemented in the back by a modified rear bumper, which fails at hiding a pair of exhaust tips quite unlike the standard Focus ST's center-exit exhaust. Other obvious changes include the wheel/tire/brake package on this particular car. Larger 19-inch wheels are shod in super-sticky Michelin Pilot Super Sport tires in 235/35/19 while the brakes feature what we think are four-piston calipers, possibly from Brembo, up front.