2002 Ford Explorer Xlt on 2040-cars
4885 East Miami River Rd., Cleves, Ohio, United States
Engine:4.0L V6 12V MPFI SOHC Flexible Fuel
Transmission:5-Speed Automatic
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1FMZU73E82ZB80270
Stock Num: B80270
Make: Ford
Model: Explorer XLT
Year: 2002
Exterior Color: Gold
Interior Color: Tan
Options: Drive Type: 4WD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 128673
Low Miles 4WD Extremely nice 3-row seating loaded all Power Am-FM-Cd Alloy Wheels Good tires looks and runs great call or stop by 877-458-3308 607-2592Guaranteed Financing and Warranties available on all cars. Need more peace of mind when buying from us? If your vehicle ever needs repairs, Weinle Motorsports will work on your vehicle for 1/2 price as long as you own it! Speak to your salesperson for complete details. Additional photos available on our website at www.weinlemotorsports.comCall us today at one of the following numbers:[877-458-3308877-458-3308877-458-3308
Ford Explorer Sport for Sale
1993 ford explorer xlt(US $2,995.00)
2014 ford explorer xlt(US $38,851.00)
2014 ford explorer xlt(US $31,688.00)
2014 ford explorer xlt(US $37,877.00)
2014 ford explorer limited(US $40,345.00)
2014 ford explorer xlt(US $38,017.00)
Auto Services in Ohio
Whitesel Body Shop ★★★★★
Walker`s Transmission Service ★★★★★
Uncle Sam`s Auto Center ★★★★★
Trinity Automotive ★★★★★
Trails West Custom Truck 4x4 Super Center ★★★★★
Stone`s Auto Service Inc ★★★★★
Auto blog
Ford C-Max sales hold steady despite fuel economy fracas
Mon, 09 Sep 2013Despite the ballyhoo that accompanied Ford's lowering of the C-Max fuel economy figures, the Blue Oval is still seeing strong demand for the five-seat MPV, as Automotive News reports. Speaking to marketing boss Jim Farley, AN says that the controversy surrounding the C-Max's fuel economy figures won't force Ford to change its marketing strategy.
Ford lowered the fuel economy rating of the C-Max after public outcry and legal action by customers that were unable to reach the 47 miles per gallon promised by the window sticker. The new ratings were dropped about a month ago to 45 mpg on the freeway and 40 mpg in the city. Ford offered rebates for current C-Max owners, with $550 going to those that bought their car and $325 to lessees. The issue, says Ford, stemmed from testing standards that allowed the automaker to base the C-Max's fuel economy on the Fusion Hybrid, because they use identical powertrains. The C-Max's less aerodynamic shape wasn't taken into account, though.
Whether Ford's PR team handled the crises perfectly or people just aren't that bothered by a four-mpg drop in combined ratings, demand remains strong for the C-Max among consumers. Ford moved 3,000 units in August, which was a 12-percent jump over July sales. Meanwhile, consumer demand through third-party shopping websites remains strong as well, according to Autometrics, a data analysis company that spoke with Automotive News. While the long-term effects of the adjustments remain unknown, the C-Max appears to have fared well in the near term.
2013 North American Car and Truck/Utility of the Year finalists announced [w/poll]
Wed, 12 Dec 20122012 is almost in the books and automakers are spending December gearing up for the 2013 auto show season, which tips off next month at the Detroit Auto Show. Traditionally, the latter opens up with the announcement of the North American Car and Truck/Utility of the Year awards, and this year figures to be no different.
But up until this moment, we didn't know which six vehicles would be parked ahead of the stage as finalists, with executives and engineers waiting for the winners to be disclosed. Whittled down from October's "short list" of nominees (11 cars and 10 truck/utility vehicles), the finalists are as follows:
2013 North American Car of the Year:
Ford Fiesta ST in startling track battle against Toyota GT86
Wed, 26 Jun 2013On the surface, there's very little that the Ford Fiesta ST and Toyota GT86 (or the Scion FR-S that is sold in the US, or the largely similar Subaru BRZ) share in common. One is a hatchback with power coming from a turbocharged engine routed to the front wheels. The other is a coupe with power coming from a naturally aspirated four-cylinder boxer engine routed to the rear wheels.
Thing is, both of them are reasonably priced performance cars aimed at a similar segment of the automotive marketplace, so a comparison isn't out of the question. It is with all of this in mind that we direct you to the video below, in which the blokes from Evo pit the two manic little machines against one another on a race track. The result? Well, it can be summed up this way: Fast versus fun.
See how the track battle goes down in the video below.