2004 Ford Excursion Xlt Sport Utility 4-door 5.4l on 2040-cars
Broaddus, Texas, United States
|
I bought this vehicle in 2012 from a local Ford dealership just as it is with 141755 miles on the odometer. It has a 6" suspension lift with 37" x 12.5" x 17" Mickey Thompson MTZ tires. I was informed that the previous owner had programmed the engine, raised the front and rear gear ratios, and did something to the transmission. It cruises at 75 mph at 2000 rpm's. All gauges are spot on and operate correctly. In October 2012, I drove it to North Dakota, where I used it throughout the winter. I drove it back to Texas in the spring and have occasionally used it to run errands. I added a 3rd row seat because the previous owner had removed it to haul camping equipment. I replaced the A/C compressor, drier, expansion tube or orifice tubes in the front and rear in August 2013. Other than the A/C, I have had no problems. |
Ford Excursion for Sale
1-owner lift'd 7.3l powerstroke diesel 4x4 limited package ... 103k miles(US $26,980.00)
2000 ford excursion limited sport utility 4-door 6.8l
2005 ford excursion eddie bauer sport utility 4-door 6.0l
2005 ford excursion limited turbo diesel 57k original miles 4x4 mint no reserve
2005 ford excursion eddie bauer turbo diesel 88k actual mile 4x4 no reserve
2004 ford excursion xlt 4wd(US $19,990.00)
Auto Services in Texas
Wynn`s Automotive Service ★★★★★
Westside Trim & Glass ★★★★★
Wash Me Car Salon ★★★★★
Vernon & Fletcher Automotive ★★★★★
Vehicle Inspections By Mogo ★★★★★
Two Brothers Auto Body ★★★★★
Auto blog
Ford fights back against patent trolls
Fri, Feb 13 2015Some people are just awful. Some organizations are just as awful. And when those people join those organizations, we get stories like this one, where Ford has spent the past several years combatting so-called patent trolls. According to Automotive News, these malicious organizations have filed over a dozen lawsuits against the company since 2012. They work by purchasing patents, only to later accuse companies of misusing intellectual property, despite the fact that the so-called patent assertion companies never actually, you know, do anything with said intellectual property. AN reports that both Hyundai and Toyota have been victimized by these companies, with the former forced to pay $11.5 million to a company called Clear With Computers. Toyota, meanwhile, settled with Paice LLC, over its hybrid tech. The world's largest automaker agreed to pay $5 million, on top of $98 for every hybrid it sold (if the terms of the deal included each of the roughly 1.5 million hybrids Toyota sold since 2000, the company would have owed $147 million). Including the previous couple of examples, AN reports 107 suits were filed against automakers last year alone. But Ford is taking action to prevent further troubles... kind of. The company has signed on with a firm called RPX, in what sounds strangely like a protection racket. Automakers like Ford pay RPX around $1.5 million each year for access to its catalog of patents, which it spent nearly $1 billion building. "We take the protection and licensing of patented innovations very seriously," Ford told AN via email. "And as many smart businesses are doing, we are taking proactive steps to protect against those seeking patent infringement litigation." What are your thoughts on this? Should this patent business be better managed? Is it reasonable that companies purchase patents only to file suit against the companies that build actual products? Have your say in Comments.
Submit your questions for Autoblog Podcast #321 LIVE!
Tue, 19 Feb 2013We're set to record Autoblog Podcast #321 tonight, and you can drop us your questions and comments regarding the rest of the week's news via our Q&A module below. Subscribe to the Autoblog Podcast in iTunes if you haven't already done so, and if you want to take it all in live, tune in to our UStream (audio only) channel at 10:00 PM Eastern tonight.
Discussion Topics for Autoblog Podcast Episode #321
Unibody Ford Ranger replacement
NHTSA opens investigation into Ford Explorer PI brakes
Wed, 27 Aug 2014This year more than most, it's pleasant when we can string together a few days without word of an automaker or the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration announcing a bunch of new recalls. It's seemingly been a little quiet on this front lately (barring a spider-related Suzuki issue revealed early today), but now we have word of the government safety agency opening a Preliminary Evaluation into the 2013 Ford Explorer Police Interceptor, a probe that could potentially affect an estimated 20,000 vehicles.
The issue being investigated concerns failures of the front brake hose on the vehicle that show "small splits in the hoses near the body side ferrule of the hose assembly," according to the agency, and the issue could result in longer stopping distances. The feds have reports of 13 malfunctions affecting 11 Explorer units. However, it's important to note that all of the incidents come from a single, unnamed metropolitan police fleet that operates 46 of them. According to The Detroit News, the failures generally took place between December and July.
NHTSA is investigating further to find if this is a more widespread issue than just this one fleet. Ford spokesperson Kelli Felker confirmed to us, "We are cooperating with NHTSA on this investigation, as we always do." Scroll down to read the agency's report.













