2014 Ford Escape Se on 2040-cars
2727 W Clay St, Saint Charles, Missouri, United States
Engine:1.6L I4 16V GDI DOHC Turbo
Transmission:6-Speed Automatic
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1FMCU0GX0EUB48732
Stock Num: 245120
Make: Ford
Model: Escape SE
Year: 2014
Exterior Color: Ginger Ale Metallic
Interior Color: Medium Light Stone
Options: Drive Type: FWD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Call Now, 877-563-9167 Only At Pundmann Ford!! Take in this impressive 2014 Ford Escape FWD SE shown in amazing [[[TrimColorTuxedo Black]]]! Our sporty crossover has a 1.6 Liter EcoBoost under the hood offering 178hp on demand. Combined with a 6-Speed Selectshift, expect an impressive 33mpg. Imagine yourself behind the wheel of this fresh faced Escape as its been aerodynamically designed to secure great mileage and offers the WOW factor. Torque vectoring control gives you awesome response and agility in the turns and it handles like a dream. Chrome exhausts and accents, rear spoiler and fog lamps add to the sporty feel. Inside we share an impressive voice-activated Ford Sync w/Sirius XM, ice blue lighting, a high-tech instrument panel and luxurious features throughout that make you feel like a rock-star. Everyone has plenty of room to relax and ride in comfort while plugging in their devices to their own power points. Ride in style and class with your Escape! Safety has never been better with the Escape. Six standard airbags, Roll stability control, SOS post-crash alert, tire pressure monitoring and traction control all ensure your safety on the road. MyKey lets you customize features such as speed and volume controls for the young drivers of the family. You have chosen a great versatile SUV with the 2014 Escape SE! Once behind the wheel you will know this is one of the smartest vehicles on the road today. Print this page and call us Now... We Know You Will Enjoy Your Test Drive Towards Ownership Pundmann Ford in St. Charles, MO, is proud to be an automotive leader in our community. Since opening our doors, Pundmann Ford has maintained our solid commitment to our customers, offering the widest selection of cars and trucks and ease of purchase.Pundmann Ford, Since 1925
Ford Escape for Sale
2014 ford escape se(US $25,087.00)
2013 ford escape se(US $20,850.00)
2002 ford escape xlt(US $3,495.00)
2002 ford escape xlt(US $4,995.00)
2002 ford escape xls(US $3,495.00)
2003 ford escape xlt(US $4,495.00)
Auto Services in Missouri
Turner Chevrolet-Cadillac Co Inc ★★★★★
Trouble Shooters ★★★★★
Thompson Buick-Pontiac-GMC-Cadillac-Saab ★★★★★
The Old Repair Shop ★★★★★
Sparks Tire and Auto ★★★★★
Slushers Downtown Tire & Auto Service Inc ★★★★★
Auto blog
Ward's calls out Ford's EcoBoost engines for their crummy fuel economy
Thu, Jan 8 2015With a name like EcoBoost, one might expect Ford's line of turbocharged engines to be somewhat, um, economical. In other words, replacing displacement with a turbocharger is supposed to deliver better fuel economy. Based on the experience time and time again of multiple Autoblog editors, your author included, this is simply not the case. Now, Ward's is calling out the cruddy efficiency numbers of Ford's EcoBoost line of engines. The column dresses down not just the new 2.7-liter V6 of the 2015 F-150, but also the 2.3-liter of the Mustang, the 1.5-liter from the Fusion and the 3.2-liter PowerStroke diesel found in the Transit, while also explaining why just one Ford engine was named to Ward's 10 Best Engines list. In its testing of all four engines, Ward's editors never came even remotely close to matching the 2.7's claimed 26 miles per gallon (for two-wheel-drive models), with the truck's computer indicating between 17.6 and 19 mpg over a 250-odd-mile run. Calculating the fuel economy manually revealed an even more depressing 15.6 miles per gallon. Criticisms with the 2.3-liter four-cylinder focused on its strange soundtrack, although it was business as usual with the 1.5-liter and 3.2 diesel, with Ward's criticizing the fuel economy of both engines. The 1.5, which Ward's claims is sold as a hybrid alternative, failed to get over 30 miles per gallon, while the five-cylinder turbodiesel's figures couldn't stand up against FCA's 3.0-liter EcoDiesel. The entire column really is worth a read, especially if you were disappointed in Ward's decision to only salute Ford's three-cylinder EcoBoost while shunning the rest of the company's new turbocharged mills.
Should heavy-duty pickup trucks have window stickers with fuel mileage estimates?
Sat, Sep 23 2017If you were to stroll into your nearest Chevrolet, Ford, GMC, Nissan, or Ram dealership, you'd find a bunch of pickup trucks. Most of those would have proper window stickers labeled with things like base prices, options prices, location of manufacture, and, crucially, fuel economy estimates. But you'd also run across a number of heavy-duty trucks with no such fuel mileage data from the Environmental Protection Agency. The EPA doesn't require automakers to publish the valuable miles-per-gallon measurement for vehicles with gross weight ratings that exceed 8,500 pounds. That makes it difficult for consumers to compare behemoths powered by turbocharged diesel engines – between one another, and between smaller, gasoline-fueled trucks. Consumer Reports doesn't think it should be this way, and it's spearheading an effort (PDF link) to get the government to require manufacturers to publish fuel economy estimates. In its own testing, CR found that heavy-duty pickups powered by Ford's Power Stroke, GM's Duramax, and FCA's Cummins diesel engines (which doesn't include the Ram's EcoDiesel) get worse fuel mileage than their lighter-duty gas-powered siblings. We're not so sure HD-truck buyers are unaware of this fact – big diesels don't really come into their own until big loads are placed in their beds or attached to their trailer hitches. Under heavy workloads, the diesel trucks will almost certainly return greater efficiency than a similar gas-powered truck. What's more, HD trucks with lumbering diesels in general make the driver feel more confident while towing due to greater torque at low engine RPM than gas trucks. They also offer greater max-weight limits. Still, we agree EPA fuel mileage estimates should be offered for heavy-duty pickups. And we think the comparisons provided by Consumer Reports might be interesting to potential buyers. Click here to see the results of CR's tests, and let us know what you think using the poll below. Related Video: Featured Gallery 2017 Ford F-Series Super Duty: First Drive View 22 Photos News Source: Consumer Reports Government/Legal Green Read This Chevrolet Ford GMC Nissan RAM Fuel Efficiency Truck Commercial Vehicles Diesel Vehicles poll gmc sierra hd chevy silverado hd
Editors’ Picks October 2022 | Electric trucks and some excellent SUVs
Wed, Nov 2 2022This month sees a bevy of totally new or totally redesigned cars gain Editors’ Pick status. Important EVs like the F-150 Lightning and GMC Hummer EV quickly jump into the list, and they do so with authority, as all our editors love these trucks. The Range Rover is always a superb experience, and this generation proves to be no different. Plus, the new generation of Kia Sportage continues to surprise and impress. In case you missed our previous Editors' Picks posts, hereÂ’s a quick refresher on whatÂ’s going on here. We rate all the new cars we drive with a 1-10 score. Cars that are exemplary in their respective segments get EditorsÂ’ Pick status. Those are the ones weÂ’d recommend to our friends, family and anybody whoÂ’s curious and asks the question. The list that youÂ’ll find below consists of every car we rated in October that earned an EditorsÂ’ Pick. 2022 GMC Hummer EV The Four-Wheel-Steer system lets the 2022 GMC HUMMER EV Pickup m View 17 Photos Quick take: The Hummer amazes as an electric supertruck with its wild acceleration, incredible off-road capability, luxuriousness and epic utility. It's far from a "green" eco-friendly vehicle, but that's not the point of this technological powerhouse. Score: 8.5 What it competes with: Rivian R1T, Ford F-150 Raptor R, Ram 1500 TRX Pros: Stupid quick, tons of tech, off-road capability in spades Cons: Not efficient, annoying in tight spaces, price From the editors: Road Test Editor Zac Palmer — "I don't think I've driven a more ridiculous vehicle this year, but that's sort of the point with the Hummer. There's a great argument against this sort of EV in that it doesn't live up to being an efficient and planet-friendly vehicle, but hey, that's not the point. The Hummer EV is a supertruck and wild technological masterpiece for off-roading in the same way that a mid-engine supercar is to track performance. It's not meant to be the EV everybody drives to work and back (mostly because few can afford it), but it serves as a line in the sand of what can be done with electric off-road trucks. This pickup rules, and if you can afford one, you're going to love it." Senior Editor, Green John Beltz Snyder — "This Hummer revival is a showcase of technology and capability on the part of GM, making it an absolute blast to drive and a joy to use.






