2007 Ford Escape Hybrid Sport Utility 4-door 2.3l on 2040-cars
Claremont, California, United States
Vehicle Title:Clear
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Sport Utility
For Sale By:Dealer
Fuel Type:ELECTRIC/GAS
Mileage: 113,111
Make: Ford
Sub Model: HYBRID
Model: Escape
Exterior Color: Silver
Trim: Hybrid Sport Utility 4-Door
Interior Color: Gray
Warranty: Vehicle has an existing warranty
Drive Type: FWD
Number of Cylinders: 4
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag, Side Airbags
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows, Power Seats
ONE OWNER SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CLEAN AUTOCHECK NEW FORD TRADE!
Ford Escape for Sale
- 2001 ford escape xls - 4x4 - v6 - cold ac - 1 owner
- Xlt suv 2.5l cd 4 speakers am/fm radio am/fm single cd/mp3 capable mp3 decoder
- Sel suv 2.0l cd 9 speakers am/fm single cd/mp3 capable mp3 decoder memory seat
- 2012 ford escape 4wd 4dr xlt(US $20,988.00)
- 2005 mercury mariner premier 4x4 leather sunroof heated seats cd carfax nice !(US $6,975.01)
- We finance : red with black leather alloy wheels(US $20,422.00)
Auto Services in California
Yuba City Toyota Lincoln-Mercury ★★★★★
World Auto Body Inc ★★★★★
Wilson Way Glass ★★★★★
Willie`s Tires & Alignment ★★★★★
Wholesale Import Parts ★★★★★
Wheel Works ★★★★★
Auto blog
NHTSA releases updated Takata airbag recalled cars list, but it still has errors
Wed, 22 Oct 2014
Unfortunately, the government's list still contains errors.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has issued an updated list of vehicle models that it's urging owners to repair under the mushrooming Takata airbag inflator recall. The latest version adds vehicles from new automakers like Subaru and Ford that are missing from the original announcement, and it also removes erroneous entries from General Motors, leaving only the 2005 Saab 9-2X (a reskinned Subaru WRX), and the 2003-2005 Pontiac Vibe, a joint project with Toyota.
Ford dinged by OSHA for asbestos at Buffalo plant
Sat, 20 Jul 2013Ford has come under fire from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) for violations regarding asbestos exposure in a company metal stamping plant in Buffalo, NY. OSHA has cited Ford for eight violations in total, according to an Automotive News report, and faces fines of up to $41,800. 537 workers are employed at the stamping facility.
The violations include a pipefitter at the facility being exposed to asbestos-containing material while working on a steam line, other workers exposed to the material without respiratory protection and work areas that were not designed to limited the number of workers in contact with asbestos. Further, areas in which asbestos was present were not properly restricted, and levels of asbestos in the air were not monitored.
According to an unnamed Ford spokesperson in the AN report, the company feels that the OSHA citation is erroneous saying, "We have fully cooperated with the local OSHA officials and we don't believe the citations are warranted." Ford also maintains that it will work with the authorities to resolve the issue.
EPA says fuel economy test for hybrids is accurate
Mon, 26 Aug 2013
The EPA says it stands behind its fuel economy test for hybrid vehicles following controversy about the testing process after Ford C-Max Hybrid customers and automotive journalists alike struggled to achieve 47 miles per gallon, the advertised mpg number, Automotive News reports. Ford responded to the issue almost two weeks ago by claiming that a 1970s-era EPA general label rule was responsible for the inaccurate mileage numbers, rerating the C-Max Hybrid's mpg numbers and offering customers rebates. Ford later said it didn't overstate the C-Max Hybrid's fuel economy and that it was surprised by the low numbers.
Ford technically didn't do anything wrong because it was following the general label rule, but agency regulator Christopher Grundler says the automaker was exploiting a loophole when it came up with the hybrid C-Max numbers, and that the testing process remains accurate. The general label rule allows vehicles that use the same engine and transmission and are in the same weight class to share fuel economy numbers, but it doesn't take into account other factors such as aerodynamic efficiency, which affects hybrids more drastically than non-hybrid vehicles. Ford originally used the Fusion Hybrid economy figures for the C-Max Hybrid and claimed the engineers didn't realize that its aerodynamic efficiency would affect fuel economy as much as it did.