2004 Ford Escape Xlt on 2040-cars
9315 Natural Bridge, St. Louis, Missouri, United States
Engine:3.0L V6 24V MPFI DOHC
Transmission:4-Speed Automatic
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1FMYU03114KB25252
Stock Num: 108263
Make: Ford
Model: Escape XLT
Year: 2004
Exterior Color: Red Fire Clearcoat Metallic
Interior Color: Medium Dark Flint
Options: Drive Type: FWD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 151073
THIS IS A GREAT MID SIZE SUV READY TO GO. FRONT WHEEL DRIVE AND V-6 3.0 ENGINE. BRAND NEW WHITE LETTER TIRES, JUST SERVICED AND STATE INSPECTED. POWER SUNROOF, POWER WINDOWS AND LOCKS. AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION. LOOK AND DRIVES GREAT.ONLY 2 OWNER ON THIS VEHICLE. WE WILL FINANCE THIS VEHICLE CALL BILL AT 866-659-2006 HUGHES AUTO INC IS LOCATED AT 9315 NATURAL BRIDGE RD IN BERKELEY MO APPROX 1 MILE EAST OF LAMBERT ST. LOUIS AIRPORT. WE HAVE BEEN IN BUSINESS OVER 30 YEARS AND ARE A 5 STAR RATING WITH BETTER BUSINESS BUREAU. WE LOOK FORWARD TO EARNING YOUR BUSINESS AND SHOWING YOU WHY YOUR NEXT PRE-OWNED CAR OR TRUCK PURCHASE SHOULD BE WITH HUGHES. CALL BILL TRACY WITH ANY QUESTIONS AT 866-659-2006
Ford Escape for Sale
2011 ford escape xlt(US $18,995.00)
2012 ford escape xlt(US $13,250.00)
2011 ford escape xls(US $13,995.00)
2001 ford escape xls(US $3,990.00)
2006 ford escape xls(US $4,195.00)
2013 ford escape titanium(US $26,998.00)
Auto Services in Missouri
West County Auto Body Repair ★★★★★
Tower Motors ★★★★★
Tiny`s Repair Service & Fab ★★★★★
Springfield Transmission Inc ★★★★★
Santa Fe Glass Co Inc ★★★★★
Santa Fe Glass Co Inc ★★★★★
Auto blog
Weekly Recap: Chevy and Alfa plot comeback strategies
Sat, Jun 27 2015Chevrolet and Alfa Romeo were two of the 20th Century's most iconic automotive brands. Chevy embodied America's post-war power and confidence. Alfa was the definition of the stylish Italian sports car. They reached halcyon heights in the 1950s and '60s, before declining precipitously amid new competition, changing consumer tastes, and uneven corporate management. Both say 2015 is the start of something better, and this week Chevy and Alfa laid out ambitious plans and showcased new cars that they hope will make them more relevant this year, and in the coming years. Each brand sits at its own crossroads, and their paths forward are as different as the Chevy Cruze and the Alfa Romeo Giulia. Chevy is still a sales beast, as evidenced by its volume of 4.8 million vehicles sold around the world last year. Chevy executives are fond of saying one of their cars is sold every seven seconds, which illustrates the strength and reach of a car brand that is the fourth largest in the world. "Make no mistake about it, we are a brand for the people," said General Motors North America president Alan Batey. But he wants consumers to want to buy a Chevy for its design and technology, not simply because it's affordable. That starts with all Chevys now featuring a distinctive a family look, with sporty cues from the Corvette or strong lines that riff on the Silverado pickup. "We want people to fall in lust with our cars," said Mike Pevovar, executive design director for Chevy passenger cars. "That initial emotional attraction has to be right on the exterior, and that's where form comes into play." Chevy is also loading up its cars, like the freshly unveiled 2016 Chevy Cruze, with technology to appeal to a younger crowd that prizes connectivity. The Cruze will offer Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with its MyLink infotainment system, and OnStar with 4G LTE and wifi. Seeking out younger buyers is also sound business practice: Millennials now outnumber Baby Boomers as the largest single age group in the United States. Younger buyers also can improve a brand's image, which is another area where Chevy would like to improve. Chevy ranks 82nd on Interbrand's Best Global Brand's list, behind 11 other automakers. Apple is No. 1. "We need our own variation of the Genius Bar," Batey said. 2016 Alfa Romeo Giulia View 3 Photos Meanwhile, Alfa is in different shape.
Detroit Three to lose dominance of North American auto output in 2017
Wed, Sep 27 2017DETROIT — North American vehicle production by the unionized Detroit Three automakers will fall behind the combined North American output of Tesla and automakers from Europe and Asia for the first time this year, IHS Markit forecast on Wednesday. In 2017, the Detroit Three could build 8.6 million vehicles in North America, while Tesla and foreign automakers build 8.7 million, IHS Markit analyst Joe Langley said. By 2024, the gap will widen, with Asian and European automakers and Tesla combining to build about 9.8 million vehicles in North America. General Motors, Ford and the North American operations of Fiat Chrysler Automobiles NV will combine to build 8.1 million vehicles, down 6 percent from this year. Mexico is on track to increase its share of North American vehicle production, Langley said, moving to 4.5 million vehicles a year by 2024 from about 4 million vehicles currently. The milestone for the growth of Tesla and foreign automakers in North America comes as the Trump administration is pushing to limit imports of vehicles from Mexico in negotiations to overhaul the North American Free Trade Agreement. The declining share of North American vehicle production for the Detroit automakers also challenges U.S. and Canadian unions that represent their workers. Canadian workers are on strike at a GM factory in Ontario to protest the automaker's decision to cut jobs and move to Mexico some production of sport utility models built there. Foreign automakers over the past year have announced plans for a wave of new or expanded plants in North America, while Tesla is ramping up to build as many as 500,000 cars a year at its plant in Fremont, Calif. Often referred to as "transplants," the foreign-owned factories are poised to become the mainstream of the North American auto industry. Automakers are increasingly using factories in China or Mexico to build vehicles that used to be assembled solely in the United States, Langley said. He cited as an example Ford's decision to shift production of the Focus small car for North America to a Chinese assembly plant. Reporting by Joseph WhiteRelated Video: Image Credit: Reuters Plants/Manufacturing Chrysler Ford GM
Ford fights back against patent trolls
Fri, Feb 13 2015Some people are just awful. Some organizations are just as awful. And when those people join those organizations, we get stories like this one, where Ford has spent the past several years combatting so-called patent trolls. According to Automotive News, these malicious organizations have filed over a dozen lawsuits against the company since 2012. They work by purchasing patents, only to later accuse companies of misusing intellectual property, despite the fact that the so-called patent assertion companies never actually, you know, do anything with said intellectual property. AN reports that both Hyundai and Toyota have been victimized by these companies, with the former forced to pay $11.5 million to a company called Clear With Computers. Toyota, meanwhile, settled with Paice LLC, over its hybrid tech. The world's largest automaker agreed to pay $5 million, on top of $98 for every hybrid it sold (if the terms of the deal included each of the roughly 1.5 million hybrids Toyota sold since 2000, the company would have owed $147 million). Including the previous couple of examples, AN reports 107 suits were filed against automakers last year alone. But Ford is taking action to prevent further troubles... kind of. The company has signed on with a firm called RPX, in what sounds strangely like a protection racket. Automakers like Ford pay RPX around $1.5 million each year for access to its catalog of patents, which it spent nearly $1 billion building. "We take the protection and licensing of patented innovations very seriously," Ford told AN via email. "And as many smart businesses are doing, we are taking proactive steps to protect against those seeking patent infringement litigation." What are your thoughts on this? Should this patent business be better managed? Is it reasonable that companies purchase patents only to file suit against the companies that build actual products? Have your say in Comments.