2012 Ford Edge Sel 2.0l Ecoboost Turbo My Ford Touch Sync Back Up Cam 21/30 Mpg on 2040-cars
Mokena, Illinois, United States
Vehicle Title:Rebuilt, Rebuildable & Reconstructed
For Sale By:Dealer
Options: Leather Seats
Safety Features: Side Airbags
Sub Model: SEL 2.0L TurbocCharged EcoBoost
Power Options: Power Windows
Exterior Color: Tan
Interior Color: Tan
Number of Cylinders: 4
Warranty: 6 Months / 7500 miles Limited Nationwide Warranty
Ford Edge for Sale
- 2007 ford edge sel sport utility 4-door 3.5l fwd - immaculate(US $17,500.00)
- 2010 se, silver(US $19,500.00)
- 2007 ford edge sel sport utility 4-door 3.5l(US $14,500.00)
- 2008 ford edge limited(US $15,000.00)
- 2013 ford edge sport edition fwd, 20" wheels, nav, panroof, warranty, rebuilt(US $28,500.00)
- Sel - loaded: like new, only 6300 miles(US $33,000.00)
Auto Services in Illinois
Xtreme City Motorsports ★★★★★
Warson Auto Plaza ★★★★★
Thomas Toyota ★★★★★
Auto blogWed, 13 Mar 2013
The 18th-annual Amelia Island Concours d'Elegance took place this past weekend, and in one of the show's biggest years yet (bringing in more than 25,000 spectators and attracting more than 300 vehicles), two powerhouses ended up winning the judges' hearts. The top Concours d'Elegance award went to a 1936 Duesenberg SJN, while the Concours de Sport went to one of the celebrated marques, a 1968 Ford GT40.
Owned by Helen and Jack Nethercutt of Sylmar, CA, this flawless Duesy is described as "one of the most powerful open cars of the 1930s," and it displays design cues of the era like rolled fenders and a tapered rear end. The SJN's supercharged straight-eight allowed it to accelerate to 100 miles per hour in just 17 seconds - surely not a disappointing feat for its day.
On a much different level of performance and timelessness, this Gulf-livery GT40 from the Rocky Mountain Auto Collection is not outdone by the elegance of the big Duesenberg thanks to some well-documented racing history. This not only includes winning at LeMans in both 1968 and 1969 - Chassis No. 1075 also managed to win a total of six times in just 11 races.
Ford has announced a major recall of 850,000 vehicles from model years 2013 and 2014 due to a problem with the "restraints control module."
According to Ford, a short circuit could develop in the module, causing the airbag warning light to illuminate. In more severe cases, dependent on where the short develops, the airbags and seatbelt pre-tensioners may not work in the event of an accident. The problems can be more wide-ranging than that, too, as systems that rely on information from the control module, such as the stability control can be affected.
With 850,000 vehicles affected, it's no surprise that some of Ford's volume leaders are covered. That includes the Fusion and Lincoln MKZ sedans, as well as the incredibly recall-prone Escape and the C-Max MPV.
The EPA says it stands behind its fuel economy test for hybrid vehicles following controversy about the testing process after Ford C-Max Hybrid customers and automotive journalists alike struggled to achieve 47 miles per gallon, the advertised mpg number, Automotive News reports. Ford responded to the issue almost two weeks ago by claiming that a 1970s-era EPA general label rule was responsible for the inaccurate mileage numbers, rerating the C-Max Hybrid's mpg numbers and offering customers rebates. Ford later said it didn't overstate the C-Max Hybrid's fuel economy and that it was surprised by the low numbers.
Ford technically didn't do anything wrong because it was following the general label rule, but agency regulator Christopher Grundler says the automaker was exploiting a loophole when it came up with the hybrid C-Max numbers, and that the testing process remains accurate. The general label rule allows vehicles that use the same engine and transmission and are in the same weight class to share fuel economy numbers, but it doesn't take into account other factors such as aerodynamic efficiency, which affects hybrids more drastically than non-hybrid vehicles. Ford originally used the Fusion Hybrid economy figures for the C-Max Hybrid and claimed the engineers didn't realize that its aerodynamic efficiency would affect fuel economy as much as it did.