Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1974 & 77 Ford Broncos Both 4x4 5.0 V8 4sp Hard Top,half Top,soft Top,no Reserve on 2040-cars

Year:1974 Mileage:999
Location:

Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States

Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Manual
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:302
For Sale By:Private Seller
Condition:
Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ...
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number)
: u15glt68899
Year: 1974
Mileage: 999
Make: Ford
Number of Cylinders: 8
Model: Bronco
Trim: 4x4
Drive Type: 4x4

1974 Bronco was running and driving 1 year ago. It was left at a restoration shop and they never finished. The body was removed from the chassis, the frame was disassembled, soda blasted and painted. The differentials and transfer case were rebuilt and installed. It has a 302 engine and is a 4 speed manual.   It has new springs, a new 3inch lift kit,   new brakes, and a new radiator in the box.  It has new rims and has 36" tires. Some steering components were replaced.  It needs brake lines, fuel lines and shocks. It has headers and mufflers but needs the  rest of the exhaust system.  The body has rust in the floor pans, rockers,  front fenders,  around fuel tank, and the tail gate. The engine ran very good.   The heads were removed to be cleaned and need to be reinstalled.   The glass is all good and functional.  The top is nice with no cracks. It has steel bumpers, an off road jack,  roof rack and roof lights and fog lights. It comes with  many extra parts. See photos

1977 Bronco has a 302 engine with low miles. It needs about an hour and a half of work to get it running.  It is a  4 speed manual.  It was a 6 year project of a sailor who could not get enough time between his 5 kids and wife to finish it.  I was going to use it for parts for the other Bronco but it is too good for that.  It has rust in the tailgate, the rocker panels, and the floor pans. The doors are good, but the latches need to be moved to close the doors.  All of the glass is good.  This bronco is mostly all together except for the interior.

You can text or call with questions. Thanks. (757) 328-2945

Auto Services in Virginia

Virgil`s Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair
Address: 1804 N Broad St, Ewing
Phone: (423) 626-6900

Valley Collision Repair Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Restoration-Antique & Classic
Address: 23101 Old Valley Pike, Saint-Davids-Church
Phone: (540) 459-2005

Valley Collision Repair Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Restoration-Antique & Classic
Address: 23101 Old Valley Pike, Harrisonburg
Phone: (540) 459-2005

Transmissions of Stafford ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Transmission
Address: 435 Ferry Rd, Mustoe
Phone: (540) 621-0632

Tonys Auto Repair & Sale ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 5258 Hull Street Rd, University-Of-Richmond
Phone: (804) 233-5599

The Body Works of VA INC ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: Round-Hill
Phone: (703) 777-5727

Auto blog

2016 Ford Focus RS to start at $35,730? [UPDATE]

Wed, Jul 29 2015

UPDATE: Unsurprisingly, Ford declined to comment on the pricing shown on the consumer page, with spokesman Aaron Miller telling Autoblog that the Blue Oval does "not comment on pricing speculation." The webpage showing the $35,730 figure has since been pulled down. We love it when automakers make little, tiny mistakes. You know, not the big stuff that leads to recalls, but the small things, like accidentally releasing pricing of a hotly anticipated model via its US consumer website. Such a thing has apparently happened to Ford, as Jalopnik's Car Buying sub-blog has uncovered a page on the site listing the starting price of the 2016 Focus RS. The cost of entry for the 345-horsepower, all-wheel-drive, torque-vectoring hot hatchback is $35,730, according to the website. That's $1,035 more than the base Subaru WRX STI, although it's $865 less than the Volkswagen Golf R. Considering the RS outguns both models by a very significant margin – 40 horsepower over the STI and 47 over the Golf R – that price seems very agreeable. If it's correct, that is. Aside from showing the RS' starting price, the page also gives us a glimpse into the options sheet. There's an RS2 equipment level that adds $2,795 to the base price along with navigation and leather Recaro seats, an $895 sunroof, and a 19-inch wheel and Michelin Pilot Sport Cup tire package for $1,990 (or just $1,395 for the 19s alone). Some fiddling with the quite incomplete configurator – there are no images and the overall design is rather glitchy – revealed a max price of $42,275. We've reached out to Ford for confirmation of the pricing information displayed. Head into Comments and let us know what you think of the pricing. Has Ford hit it out of the park by slotting in a more powerful competitor between the Subaru and Volkswagen? Were you expecting a higher price (like your author), or is this still too much money for a jumped-up Focus? Related Video:

Next Shelby Mustang to wear GT350 nameplate

Fri, 21 Jun 2013

Earlier this month, rumors started to swirl 'round the web about the next-generation Ford SVT Mustang - the halo version of the all-new 2015 'Stang seen testing in the gallery above. Originally, we heard that the Shelby GT500 moniker would be dumped in favor of "a name you're familiar with," which some sources guessed could mean a return of the Cobra nameplate.
That might not be correct. According to Road & Track, citing a report from Mustangs Daily, the new range-topping Mustang will bring back the Shelby GT350 name - currently used on an aftermarket version of Ford's Pony produced by Shelby American (take a look at our recent Quick Spin of that car). Expect the new GT350 to be quite a bit different than the current GT500 - it will be all motor, using a V8 that's derived from the naturally aspirated 5.0-liter Coyote engine (though it will no doubt have a higher displacement). The GT350 will be a lot more powerful than the next Mustang GT, which is expected to offer something like 450 horsepower, but won't be quite as absurd as the 662-horsepower GT500 we currently enjoy.
The Shelby GT350 will reportedly bow with the rest of the new Mustang range at the 2014 New York Auto Show, which coincides exactly with the original Mustang's debut at the New York World's Fair in 1964. If that seems far out, don't worry, we'll be seeing the rest of the 2015 Mustang range before then, but Road & Track reports that the 2014 Detroit Auto Show stage will be reserved for the reveal of the next Ford F-150 pickup.

180,000 new vehicles are sitting, derailed by lack of transport trains

Wed, 21 May 2014

If you're planning on buying a new car in the next month or so, you might want to pick from what's on the lot, because there could be a long wait for new vehicles from the factory. Locomotives continue to be in short supply in North America, and that's causing major delays for automakers trying to move assembled cars.
According to The Detroit News, there are about 180,000 new vehicles waiting to be transported by rail in North America at the moment. In a normal year, it would be about 69,000. The complications have been industry-wide. Toyota, General Motors, Honda and Ford all reported experiencing some delays, and Chrysler recently had hundreds of minivans sitting on the Detroit waterfront waiting to be shipped out.
The problem is twofold for automakers. First, the fracking boom in the Bakken oil field in the Plains and Canada is monopolizing many locomotives. Second, the long, harsh winter is still causing major delays in freight train travel. The bad weather forced trains to slow down and carry less weight, which caused a backup of goods to transport. The auto companies resorted to moving some vehicles by truck, which was a less efficient but necessary option.