2002 Dodge Intrepid Police Package on 2040-cars
Saint Leonard, Maryland, United States
|
For sale used 2002 Dodge Intrepid police Package. 3.5L,V6, 24volt HD system. Two new front tires, new front end alignment no leaks detected. Car runs clean no smoke, knocks or engine ticking noises. A/C runs cold!!!!! Check engine light is on I was advised it was problem the O2 sensor from sitting for length of time. This vehicle was purchased from a town ship in PA, never used as a patrol vehicle was advised it was an administrative vehicle for office use. I used this vehicle for my prior uniformed security company which patroled communities and shopping malls which is not currently in business any longer. very little highway use except to get from point A to point B. This vehicle is equipped with yellow and green deck lights and 8 strobe package with four in front light and four in tail light areas, seperate inside trunk lid yellow flashing lights for off road emergency use also a scanner and CB radio. All lights in full working order. This vehicle is ready to work as security vehicle, construction work sites and or wide load trucking escort business.
Selling due to vehicle sitting with no use for a long time. Clear title. No zero rating buyers unless contact with me (AJ) is made sorry. This car also listed locally so have the right to cancel listing if sold locally. NO SHIPPING/DELIVERY PICK UP ONLY!!!! (after funds have cleared or cash at time of pick up). This car is sold as is no warranty attached or implied. Please contact seller with any questions prior to buying this item 4434540842. I have video of car running which was taken on 02/27/2013 which can be sent, tried downloading but would not allow the video, might be me not knowing how. Serious inquiries only please..
|
Dodge Intrepid for Sale
1998 dodge intrepid es sedan 4-door 3.2l(US $1,800.00)
2002 dodge intrepid se sedan 4-door 3.5l
2004 dodge intrepid es sedan 4-door 3.5l, v6, 24 valve high-performance engine(US $5,499.00)
2004 dodge intrepid se sedan 4-door 2.7l(US $1,050.00)
2001 dodge intrepid es sedan 4-door 3.2l
Dodge intrepid r/t 3.5 v6 4 door black(US $3,300.00)
Auto Services in Maryland
Starting Gate Servicenter ★★★★★
Square Deal Garage ★★★★★
Sir Michael`s Auto Sales ★★★★★
Sedlak Automotive, LLC ★★★★★
Mr. Tire Auto Service Centers ★★★★★
Milford Automotive Servicenter ★★★★★
Auto blog
2020 Dodge Durango SRT Drivers' Notes | When excess is a good thing
Wed, Dec 4 2019Performance SUVs and crossovers from non-luxury brands are still in a nascent stage of development. Models like the Porsche Cayenne Turbo, BMW X5 M and others are on subsequent generations of their high-performance high-riding machines. Meanwhile, the 2019 Dodge Durango SRT is still refreshingly new. It’s also about as American as it gets. Dodge shoehorned in the 6.4-liter V8 and gave it an exhaust system that screams ‘Murica at anyone who strays too close. It makes a glorious 475 horsepower and 470 pound-feet of torque, completing the sprint to 60 mph in 4.4 seconds. An eight-speed automatic transmission sends power to all four wheels, which means you have traction — something the Challengers and Chargers with this engine could use a bit more of. Despite the Dodge being far cheaper than other big, high performance luxury SUVs out there, it still isnÂ’t cheap. The SRT has a base price of $64,490. Ours stickers for a much higher $78,235. Unsurprisingly, Dodge makes you pay the big bucks for most of the luxury features and customization options. A $2,395 Technology Group adds adaptive cruise control, lane departure warning and forward collision avoidance systems. Fancy interior materials like a suede headliner, nicer materials on the instrument panel and carbon fiber inserts can be had in a $2,495 package. The stripes are $1,295, and the 20-inch wheels cost $995. To get the second row console with an armrest and storage, youÂ’ll have to pay an extra $595. A $78,235 Durango might sound like a completely egregious amount of money, but itÂ’s still far below what youÂ’ll pay for a BMW X7 or Mercedes-Benz GLS that goes just as fast. ItÂ’s no muscle SUV for the people, but it is a muscle SUV for more people than could afford one previously. Assistant Editor Zac Palmer: An American SUV with a giant V8 feels like a superior descendant of muscle cars than most other “muscle cars” on sale today. Both the Mustang and Camaro slant toward the sports car side of things, leaving FCA to carry on the muscle car tradition. And man, Dodge carries it on well. FCA could slot its 6.4-liter V8 into nearly anything and IÂ’d love it, so it was no surprise that I enjoyed it thrashing it about in this behemoth of an SUV. Traction off the line was one major benefit in the Durango over the Charger and Challenger. Matt the throttle and it just leaps forward, similar to the Jeep Grand Cherokee SRT.
Dodge bringing revamped Challenger, Charger to Big Apple
Mon, 07 Apr 2014The 2014 New York Auto Show will be a big one for Dodge, as the brand has announced that refreshed versions of the 2015 Challenger and 2015 Charger will debut at the show. This is a particularly big deal for the two-door Challenger which, visually, has remained unchanged since is burst back onto the scene in 2008 and helped reignite the muscle car wars.
As a sort of hint, this announcement was accompanied by the picture you see above - the Super Bee logo in the Challenger's new instrument cluster. According to Dodge, the New York debut of a new "powertrain combination" - possibly with the high-output Hellcat V8 - will leave enthusiasts "abuzz."
As for the Charger, Dodge is promising a full redesign that should be a significant departure from the blunt, angry looks of the current model. At this point, there's no indication that the Challenger's new powertrain could be fitted to the Charger, although considering how mechanically similar these two vehicles have been, it doesn't seem outside the realm of possibility.
Fiat Chrysler wins top Total Quality Award for first time
Mon, Jul 20 2015The Strategic Vision Total Quality Awards are 20 years old in 2015, and Chrysler has never topped the awards before. Until now, that is. Fiat Chrysler takes the overall award on the corporate level with six segment leaders from Fiat, Dodge, Jeep, and Ram. The Fiat 500 won Small Multi-Function Car, the 500e won Small Alternative Powertrain, the Dodge Challenger tied at the top in the Specialty Coupe category alongside the very un-coupe Mini Cooper Countryman, the Jeep Wrangler Unlimited took the Entry SUV category, the Dodge Durango won in Mid-Size SUV, and Ram took the overall in Best Non-Luxury Brand. The accolade means FCA has gone from one segment winner in 2010 to overall victory in five years. Cars have gotten so good, says Strategic Vision, that it is harder than ever to win. In fact, says the group, 18 years ago 85 percent of all vehicle brands had more than half a problem per vehicle. This year, no brand has more than half a problem per vehicle. The organization measures "over 155 specific aspects of the customer's experience," and scores are based on input from more than 46,000 customers. Other notables in and near the winner's circle include Volkswagen and General Motors, who tied for second place on the corporate scale, one point behind FCA. The Mini Cooper Roadster scored the highest of any model, the Corvette Stingray Convertible and Coupe scored the second- and third-highest. The Chevrolet Colorado is the first domestic Standard Pickup winner in more than ten years, and the Nissan Titan carried the Full-Size Pickup category. The press release below has all the details on how winners and losers are selected, and the full list of automakers and how they finished. "The Customer's 'Total' Experience Defines Quality, Fiat Chrysler Scores Highest in Total Quality," says Strategic Vision The 2015 Total Quality Awards® SAN DIEGO, Friday, July 17, 2015 — Unknown to many, when some consumer research firms rank a car company's quality performance they often do so by simply "counting problems." In the past, this may have been acceptable, but in today's modern and efficient manufacturing world the difference between the worst brand and best brand is LESS than half-a-problem per vehicle. Thus, any "quality ranking" based on this method is severely lacking in the complete picture of the "Total" Quality experience that customers actually use to judge their product ownership.




