2006 Chrysler Pt Cruiser Base Wagon 4-door 2.4l on 2040-cars
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
MY G FRIEND AND I HAVE OWNED THIS CAR FOR 3YRS. IT RUNS GOOD WHEN THE BELT IS REPAIRED, BUT IT'S STILL A FIXER. THE WHOLE CAR, WITH PARTS NEW AND USED IS FOR SALE. IF I NEED TO I WILL CONSIDER SELLING PARTS, BUT THE BUYER WILL HAVE TO PRE PAY AND ARRANGE FOR THE TOWING TO PICK UP THE CAR. IT IS NOT RUNNING.
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser for Sale
- Chrysler pt cruiser, 2007, good condition low miles(US $3,500.00)
- 2006 chrysler pt cruiser, no reserve
- 06 keyless entry sunroof tint cd player auxiliary input window vent visors
- Pt cruiser.....touring edition.....convertible.....2.4 l turbo......
- 2006 chrysler pt cruiser...only 16,078 miles!!(US $7,450.00)
- 2005 chrysler pt cruiser touring convertible 2-door 2.4l(US $3,200.00)
Auto Services in Arizona
Windshield Replacement Phoenix ★★★★★
Valley Express Auto Repair ★★★★★
Tj`s Speedometer Repair ★★★★★
Super Discount Transmissions ★★★★★
Sun Devil Auto ★★★★★
Storm Auto Glass ★★★★★
Auto blog
Jeep Wrangler diesel likely after 2015 model refresh
Thu, 28 Feb 2013We automotive journalists aren't always the right people to ask about whether a US-spec vehicle should or should not be offered with a diesel powertrain (hint: the answer is usually "YES"). But when it comes to the iconic, off-road-ready Jeep Wrangler, we aren't the only ones who have been clamoring for an oil-burning engine behind that famous seven-slat grille. To that end, it appears there's good news on the horizon, as Jeep CEO Mike Manley recently told Ward's Auto that the "Wrangler is on the radar to get (a) diesel."
"I'm confident that the Grand Cherokee will show just how large a demand there is for diesel, and I think what that will do is reinforce the need for us to target Wrangler as a vehicle that can take a diesel," Manley told Ward's. The most rugged of Jeeps is scheduled to get an overhaul around 2015-16, and the diesel powertrain will likely be introduced around that time.
This year alone, Chrysler will be adding a diesel engine to the Grand Cherokee SUV, as well as the Ram 1500 pickup and Promaster utility van.
Share price falls on skepticism of Chrysler-Fiat five-year plan
Thu, 08 May 2014Following this week's Fiat Chrysler extravaganza, where the Italian-American manufacturer announced its plans for the next five years, the Autoblog staff was cautiously optimistic of the company's future. Investors? Not so much.
Fiat saw its shares tumble 12 percent in Wednesday's trading, falling from 8.67 euros ($12.06 at today's rates) to 7.44 euros ($10.35) as of this writing, with blame partly going to the Italian half of the FCA marriage, which recorded a pretty significant drop in profits during the first quarter of this year.
The plan, which will cost around $77 billion over the next several years, is facing criticism from investors thanks in part to a 1.4-percent drop in Fiat's first-quarter profits, to 622 million euros ($862 million). That figure is also short of Bloomberg analysts' projections, which predicted $1.18 billion in profits before taxes, interest and one-time items.
Move over Audi, now Chrysler has a beef with Tesla's claims
Thu, 23 May 2013In the same week that Audi said "not so fast" to some claims from Tesla, Chrysler has responded to a new press release from the California-based EV-maker by saying "not exactly, Tesla." The statement, released through the company's blog, comes in response to Tesla claiming it was "the only American car company to have fully repaid the government." Chrysler notes that it, too, recently paid back Uncle Sam from its 2008 bailout. Similar to Audi's recent press release, which was eventually and mysteriously deleted from the German automaker's site, Chrysler is both right and wrong in its statement.
Tesla specifically said that it had paid back the Department of Energy loans that many automakers received - including Fisker and VPG Autos - while Chrysler's retort argues Tesla is "unmistakably incorrect" since it repaid the government in 2011 a full six years early. Technically, the statements from both automakers are correct, but Tesla's startup loan originated from the DoE, while Chrysler's loan came in bailout form from the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). Further, as The Detroit News notes, Chrysler's loan still cost taxpayers well over a billion dollars after all was said and done - those negative assets tied to "old Chrysler" in the bankruptcy did not require repayment.