1979 Chrysler Lebaron Base Coupe 2-door 3.7l on 2040-cars
Greeley, Kansas, United States
Fuel Type:GAS
Engine:3.7L 3687CC 225Cu. In. l6 GAS OHV Naturally Aspirated
Vehicle Title:Clear
Year: 1979
Number of Cylinders: 6
Make: Chrysler
Model: LeBaron
Trim: Base Coupe 2-Door
Mileage: 116,000
Drive Type: RWD
1979 Chrysler Lebaron, 116K miles, nice tires with white letters and lots of tread left, runs and drives great. Interior is good except for the driver seat is torn. $2200 OBO. Call for more info or to come take a look. 7eight5-4one8-4two3one.
|
Chrysler LeBaron for Sale
- 1990 chrysler le baron gt convertible , ohhh baby , look at the miles no reserve
- 1995 chrysler lebaron lx convertible maryland inspected no reserve
- One of a kind factory turbo with 6 speed on the floor with consol no reserve
- 1989 chrysler tc masarati 2 li i4 2 dr turbo convertible(US $6,900.00)
- Coupe, v-8 automatic, leather, moon roof, power windows & locks, power seat
- 1989 chrysler lebaron gt convertible 2-door 2.5l
Auto Services in Kansas
Topeka Battery Co ★★★★★
Tim Worthy`s Transmission Repair ★★★★★
Susquehanna Auto Clinic ★★★★★
O`Reilly Auto Parts ★★★★★
Outlaw Auto Sports ★★★★★
Olathe Auto Paints & Supplies Inc ★★★★★
Auto blog
Chrysler releases Born Maker ad campaign for 2015 200 [w/video]
Fri, 06 Jun 2014
"The 200 sets the benchmark, for us, on how we plan to develop cars going forward." - Marissa Hunter
Is the 2015 Chrysler 200 the most important new product for Fiat Chrysler Automobiles? While it is certainly debatable, we'd be strongly inclined to say "yes." As the first competent midsize sedan that Chrysler has released in the better part of two decades, the new 200 is absolutely crucial to achieving the brand's goal of becoming FCA's "mainstream" manufacturer.
Toyota tops Consumer Reports best, worst used car values
Tue, 18 Mar 2014We often mock Toyota for building boring, soulless cars, but a new study by Consumer Reports suggests that regardless of whether that's true, the company has some of the best used cars on the market. In its report on used cars from 2004-2013, the Japanese automaker had 11 vehicles among its brands on the list - more than any other automaker.
CR breaks the list down by cost and vehicle size, and Toyota has at least one entry at every price point and in nearly every segment. To score a recommendation, a vehicle had to perform well in the magazine's initial tests and score above-average reliability results. It also tried to only suggest cars with electronic stability control. Of the 28 recommended vehicles, Honda/Acura had the second most mentions at six, and Ford, Hyundai and Subaru managed two each.
The Detroit brands also made it to the list, but not in a positive way. Consumer Reports compiled a list of 22 vehicles it wouldn't recommend because "they have multiple years of much-worse-than-average overall reliability." General Motors had the most unrecommended models on the list at six, but Chrysler and Ford weren't far behind, with five cars each from their brands not making the grade. The full list of recommendations is available on CR's website.
Move over Audi, now Chrysler has a beef with Tesla's claims
Thu, 23 May 2013In the same week that Audi said "not so fast" to some claims from Tesla, Chrysler has responded to a new press release from the California-based EV-maker by saying "not exactly, Tesla." The statement, released through the company's blog, comes in response to Tesla claiming it was "the only American car company to have fully repaid the government." Chrysler notes that it, too, recently paid back Uncle Sam from its 2008 bailout. Similar to Audi's recent press release, which was eventually and mysteriously deleted from the German automaker's site, Chrysler is both right and wrong in its statement.
Tesla specifically said that it had paid back the Department of Energy loans that many automakers received - including Fisker and VPG Autos - while Chrysler's retort argues Tesla is "unmistakably incorrect" since it repaid the government in 2011 a full six years early. Technically, the statements from both automakers are correct, but Tesla's startup loan originated from the DoE, while Chrysler's loan came in bailout form from the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). Further, as The Detroit News notes, Chrysler's loan still cost taxpayers well over a billion dollars after all was said and done - those negative assets tied to "old Chrysler" in the bankruptcy did not require repayment.
2040Cars.com © 2012-2024. All Rights Reserved.
Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.
Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of the 2040Cars User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
0.025 s, 7231 u