1948 Desoto Custom Series Lwb 8 Passenger Sedan Limousine Rust Free Orig. Calif on 2040-cars
Hemet, California, United States
Engine:6 cylinder
Body Type:Limousine
Vehicle Title:Clear
Sub Model: MOPAR Chrysler Dodge Imperial
Make: DeSoto
Number of Cylinders: 6
Trim: Custom LWB
Drive Type: Fluid Drive
Mileage: 86,000
Please do NOT bid if you cannot perform or follow simple guidelines! This is a real auction. High bidder pays for the car within the proper listed time period and picks it up within 30 days. No first time or NEGITIVE bidders. NO SCAMS!
Hello,
1948 Desoto Custom long wheel base 7-8 passenger sedan. This is NOT a formal type (w/division window) of limousine but, more of a big comfortable luxurious sedan with fold out jump seats to accomodate 2 extra travelers. This is a factory built model and quite rare when new! Now try and find one.
I purchased this car 4 years ago from original owners family in LA. He was an engineer who took exellent care of it but, it did sit in carport for 40 years and was only started/moved occasionally. Solid car.
Most of the paint is the original. Some areas that were very thin were spotted in. Chrome and stainless mostly all good solid original condition (none missing). Floors rock solid as is the rest of this cars body. Yes some dings, chips and scratches..nothing too bad. I never intended on repainting it but, you decide.
Interior is complete but fairly rough. Not from wear but, age. It will need to be redone, however again it's all there for patterns and for the most part un-tampered with. Door handles, window cranks, trim, knobs 99% all in there, intact and inplace. Dash is in quite nice original condition. Gauges nearly all work.
Engine starts and runs good. Good oil pressure. Trans shifts well. Radiator hoses and clamps (orig type) were replaced. I also replaced fuel pump and more. I did NOT rebuild /replace generator or water pump yet, those were on my list before any regular driving (they currently are in working order). I do have new water pump in box, just have'nt put it in. Brakes were gone through completely, master, wheel cylinders, shoes etc all new! Car is currently in turn key running condition.
All 4X tires were replaced with correct size and pattern white walls. Only about 2-3 miles on them. I just drive it on my property but, drives good and tight as well as quiet and smooth.
Clear California title in my name. Car is filed NON-OP, as I do not drive it on the street. That means no registration dues. Rear license plate and frame do not go with the car (It is just there to fill the void). Front 1963 issued license plate came with the car and goes with it.
This car is over 60 years old and no warranty. No you are not going to fly in from New York and drive it back home seeing all the sights on the way. It could do that with major tune up and inspection of everything vital. The car has a CLEAR TITLE in my name. There are minor scratches, dings, bumps a few things that don't work but, overall good solid presentable original 65 year old car! This car will need to be towed or trailered to be safe and also do to the fact it is currently non-opped. This car will require some restoration work.
This car is sold as-is where is. Over 60 years old/used hence: NO WARRANTY. Please be sure your funds are in order prior to bidding! $500.00 due within 24 hrs winning auction via PayPal. Balance in full within 5 days. Up to 30 days free storage. DO NOT ATTEMPT TO RENEGOCIATE AFTER AUCTION. High bidder buys the car. Get your permission from your wife, Dad, uncle, Doctor etc PRIOR to bidding. NO FIRST TIME OR NEGITIVE BIDDERS, if you have less then 10 feedback-contact me prior to bidding to avoid cancellation. Please feel free to ask questions prior to bidding. I DO NOT SHIP but, I will assist meeting here with YOUR transport company. This car will require some restoration work. This car may be sold through other means hence, SELLER HAS RIGHT TO END AUCTION if needed. Pre-inspections are welcomed with advanced notice prior to end of auction/sale. Please don't ask the reserve, I have never been to an auction were the reserve is disclosed?? Buy it now price can be considered with your reasonable offer.Thank you for your interest.
Chrysler Imperial for Sale
1965 chrysler imperial one owner car all original. never wrecked 68,000 miles
Maybe the best original 68 chrysler imperial convertible to be found 74ks loaded
1965 chrysler imperial crown 6.8l parts or restoration
1965 imperial crown, 2nd owner, 97,899 miles, orig. white, w/ turquoise interior(US $11,000.00)
1982 chrysler imperial frank sinatra edition, calif desert car, low miles
1968 imperial crown coupe mobile director - rarest of rare, executive, dignitary
Auto Services in California
Windshield Repair Pro ★★★★★
Willow Springs Co. ★★★★★
Williams Glass ★★★★★
Wild Rose Motors Ltd. ★★★★★
Wheatland Smog & Repair ★★★★★
West Valley Smog ★★★★★
Auto blog
Move over Audi, now Chrysler has a beef with Tesla's claims
Thu, 23 May 2013In the same week that Audi said "not so fast" to some claims from Tesla, Chrysler has responded to a new press release from the California-based EV-maker by saying "not exactly, Tesla." The statement, released through the company's blog, comes in response to Tesla claiming it was "the only American car company to have fully repaid the government." Chrysler notes that it, too, recently paid back Uncle Sam from its 2008 bailout. Similar to Audi's recent press release, which was eventually and mysteriously deleted from the German automaker's site, Chrysler is both right and wrong in its statement.
Tesla specifically said that it had paid back the Department of Energy loans that many automakers received - including Fisker and VPG Autos - while Chrysler's retort argues Tesla is "unmistakably incorrect" since it repaid the government in 2011 a full six years early. Technically, the statements from both automakers are correct, but Tesla's startup loan originated from the DoE, while Chrysler's loan came in bailout form from the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). Further, as The Detroit News notes, Chrysler's loan still cost taxpayers well over a billion dollars after all was said and done - those negative assets tied to "old Chrysler" in the bankruptcy did not require repayment.
Fiat Chrysler recalls 1.33 million vehicles over fire, air bag risks
Fri, Jul 14 2017WASHINGTON - Fiat Chrysler Automobiles NV said on Friday it is recalling 1.33 million vehicles worldwide in two separate campaigns for potential fire risks and inadvertent airbag deployments. The Italian-American automaker said it is recalling about 770,000 sport utility vehicles because of a wiring issue that may lead to inadvertent deployment of the driver-side air bag and is linked to reports of five related minor injuries, but no crashes. The company said wiring could chafe against pieces of steering-wheel trim, potentially causing a short-circuit and ultimately leading to an inadvertent air bag deployment. The issue could also cause unintended windshield wiper operation or inoperable switches. The recall covers 538,000 2011-2015 Dodge Journey vehicles in North America and 233,000 2011-2015 Fiat Freemont crossovers sold elsewhere. Dealers will inspect and replace the wiring, as needed and equip it with additional protective covering. The automaker is also recalling 565,000 vehicles to replace their alternators because of fire risks. The company said hot ambient temperatures could lead to premature diode wear, may result in a burning odor or smoke, could impact the anti-lock braking system or lead to engine stalls. The company said it is aware of two potentially related accidents but no injuries. The recall covers 2011-2014 model year Chrysler 300, Dodge Charger and Dodge Challenger cars and Dodge Durango SUVs and 2012-2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee SUVs. In October, Fiat Chrysler recalled about 86,000 Ram 2500 and 3500 pickup trucks, 3500, 4500 and 5500 chassis cabs from the 2007-2013 model years and 2011-2014 Dodge Charger Pursuit sedans for the same alternator issue. Fiat Chrysler said at the time one minor injury was related to the recall. Dealers will replace the alternators. By David ShepardsonRelated Video: Auto News Chrysler Fiat RAM Safety Coupe SUV Sedan FCA dodge journey fiat chrysler automobiles fiat freemont
This or That: 2005 Chrysler Crossfire SRT6 vs. 1984 Pontiac Fiero
Tue, Feb 10 2015Welcome to another round of This or That, where two Autoblog editors pick a topic, pick a side and pull no punches. Last round pitted yours truly against Associate Editor Brandon Turkus, and my chosen VW Vanagon Syncro narrowly defeated Brandon's 1987 Land Rover. In fact, it was, by far, the closest round we've seen, with 1,907 voters seeing things my way (for 50.8 percent of the vote) versus 1,848 votes for Brandon's Rover (49.2 percent). Sweet, sweet victory! For this latest round of This or That, I've roped Editor Greg Migliore into what I think is a rather fun debate. We've each chosen our favorite terrible cars, setting a price limit of $10,000 to make sure neither of us went too crazy with our automotive atrocities. I think we've both chosen terribly... and I mean that in the best way possible. 2005 Chrysler Crossfire SRT6 Jeremy Korzeniewski: Why It's Terrible: Taken in isolation, the Chrysler Crossfire isn't necessarily a terrible car. In fact, it drives pretty darn well, and there's a lot of solid engineering under its slinky shape. Problem is, that engineering was already rather long in the tooth well before Chrysler ever got its hands on it, having come from Mercedes-Benz, which used the basic chassis and drivetrain in a previous version of its SLK coupe and roadster. Granted, the SLK was an okay car, too, but even when new, it hardly set the world on fire with sporty driving dynamics. Chrysler took these decent-but-no-more bits and pieces from the Mercedes parts bin – remember, this car was conceived in the disastrous Merger Of Equals days – and covered them with a rather attractive hard-candy shell. Unfortunately, the super sporty shape wrote checks in the minds of buyers that its well-worn mechanicals were simply unable to cash, though an injection of power courtesy of a supercharged V6 engine in the SRT6 model, as seen here, certainly helped ease some of those woes. In the end, Chrysler was left with a so-called halo car that looked the part but never quite performed the part. It was almost universally panned by critics as an overpriced parts-bin special, which, I must add, was damningly accurate. As a result, sales were very slow, and within the first few months, dealers were clearancing the car at cut-rate prices, just to keep them from taking up too much of the showroom floor. Why It's Not That Terrible, After All: I can speak from personal experience when discussing the Chrysler Crossfire. You see, I owned one. Well, sort of...