Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2004 Chevrolet Venture Lt Mini Passenger Van 4-door 80,000 Miles on 2040-cars

US $6,900.00
Year:2004 Mileage:80000
Location:

Clinton Township, Michigan, United States

Clinton Township, Michigan, United States
Advertising:

Loaded Like NEW '04 Chevy Van.

Van Color: Blue Granite Metallic (medium grey)

Interior: Grey

Mileage: 80,000 Miles 134,000km


Smoke free! Carpet has been covered and is like new.

Very well maintained! Just changed oil and filter :) for new owner! I have the printed Car Fax for new owner as well. This is a must see! It's extremely clean ;) *Power Sliding Doors! * Front seat HEATERS! Entertainment package.. DVD player and headsets! Onstar!


MORE SPECS:


* LEATHER 7 PASS. SEATING - QUAD BUCKETS

Seats : 6 WAY POWER DRIVER

Seats : 6 WAY POWER FRONT PASSENGER

DEEP TINTED GLASS AJ7 - SIDE IMPACT AIRBAGS

POWER REAR VENT WINDOWS

SPLIT FOLDING REAR SEAT

REMOTE KEYLESS ENTRY SYSTEM

FRONT AND REAR FLOOR MATS

REAR WINDOW WASHER & WIPER

REAR WINDOW DEFROSTER

AIR CONDITIONING

FRONT/REAR AIR CONDITIONING

ILLUMINATED VISOR MIRRORS

DUAL ELECTRIC HEATED MIRRORS

*POWER PASSENGER SLIDING DOORS

SPECIAL HANDLING SUSPENSION

RATIO TRANSAXLE FINAL DRIVE

AUTOMATIC LOAD LEVEL CONTROL

STANDARD RATIO REAR AXLE

ANTI-LOCK BRAKE SYSTEM

HEATER - ENGINE BLOCK

CRUISE CONTROL

* FRONT SEAT HEATER

125 AMP GENERATOR

DRY AIR CLEANER

3400 SFI V6 ENGINE

4-SPEED AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION

TRACTION CONTROL SYSTEM

16" ALUMINUM WHEELS

SPORT TOURING PACKAGE TRACKING OPTION

DVD ENTERTAINMENT SYSTEM

DRIVER INFORMATION CENTER

THEFT DETERRENT ALARM SYSTEM

RADIO: AM/FM 6 DISC IN DASH CD

ULTRASONIC REAR

PARKING ASSIST

ONSTAR COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

UNIVERSAL GARAGE DOOR OPENER

STEERING WHEEL MOUNTED CONTROLS

2ND ROW SEAT AUDIO CONTROLS

AIR INFLATOR KIT

ROOF RACK: SIDE RAILS

TRAILERING

LT TRIM PACKAGE

SEATING - 7 PASSENGER


Auto Services in Michigan

Winners Auto & Cycle ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Engine Rebuilding, Automotive Tune Up Service
Address: 17700 Telegraph Rd, Romulus
Phone: (734) 229-1009

Westborn Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 2823 Monroe St, Hazel-Park
Phone: (313) 565-0220

Weber Transmission Company ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Transmission
Address: 130 Oakdale Ave, Luna-Pier
Phone: (419) 698-1011

Vaneck Auto Body ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Dent Removal
Address: 4520 Chicago Dr SW, Grandville
Phone: (616) 532-1626

US Wheel Exchange ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Wheels, Automobile Accessories
Address: 25245 John R Rd, Keego-Harbor
Phone: (248) 373-1300

U Name IT Auto ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair
Address: 7162 E Apple Ave, Ravenna
Phone: (231) 788-1970

Auto blog

Impala SS vs. Marauder: Recalling Detroit’s muscle sedans 

Thu, Apr 30 2020

Impala SS vs. Marauder — it was comparo that only really happened in theory. ChevyÂ’s muscle sedan ran from 1994-96, while MercuryÂ’s answer arrived in 2003 and only lasted until 2004. TheyÂ’re linked inextricably, as there were few options for powerful American sedans during that milquetoast period for enthusiasts. The debate was reignited recently among Autoblog editors when a pristine 1996 Chevy Impala SS with just 2,173 miles on the odometer hit the market on Bring a Trailer. Most of the staff favored the Impala for its sinister looks and said that it lived up to its billing as a legit muscle car. Nearly two-thirds of you agree. We ran an unscientific Twitter poll that generated 851 votes, 63.9 percent of which backed the Impala. Muscle sedans, take your pick: — Greg Migliore (@GregMigliore) April 14, 2020 Then and now enthusiasts felt the Impala was a more complete execution with guts. The Marauder, despite coming along later, felt more hacked together, according to prevailing sentiments. Why? On purpose and on paper theyÂ’re similar. The ImpalaÂ’s 5.7-liter LT1 V8 making 260 horsepower and 330 pound-feet of torque was impressive for a two-ton sedan in the mid-Â’90s. The Marauder was actually more powerful — its 4.6-liter V8 was rated at 302 hp and 318 lb-ft. The ImpalaÂ’s engine was also used in the C4 Corvette. The MarauderÂ’s mill was shared with the Mustang Mach 1. You can see why they resonated so deeply with Boomers longing for a bygone era and also captured the attention of coming-of-age Gen Xers. Car and DriverÂ’s staff gave the Marauder a lukewarm review back in ‘03, citing its solid handling and features, yet knocking the sedan for being slow off the line. In a Hemmings article appropriately called “Autopsy” from 2004, the ImpalaÂ’s stronger low-end torque and smooth shifting transmission earned praise, separating it from the more sluggish Mercury. All of this was captured in the carsÂ’ acceleration times, highlighting metrically the differences in their character. The Impala hit 60 miles per hour in 6.5 seconds, while the Marauder was a half-second slower, according to C/D testing. Other sites have them closer together, which reinforces the premise it really was the little things that separated these muscle cars. Both made the most of their genetics, riding on ancient platforms (FordÂ’s Panther and General MotorsÂ’ B-body) that preceded these cars by decades. Both had iconic names.

My year in EVs: 8 electrics that are changing the car industry

Wed, Dec 1 2021

The year 2021 will go down as an inflection point in the auto industry’s transition to electric vehicles. It's when many much-anticipated models became reality. No longer sketches or sketchy prototypes, electric vehicles appeared from all corners with everything from the Lucid Air to Ford Mustang Mach-E changing how we think about transportation. I managed to drive a lot of them, and as I went through my notes, I realized IÂ’ve got a mini memoir of the seminal EVs of 2021. HereÂ’s my take on eight of them. Hummer EV Easily the most over-the-top EV I tested this year. The 1,000-hp super truck lived up to the hype with its domineering presence, stupendous power and simply being a reincarnated Hummer. I took it for a short spin on- and off-road at the General Motors Proving Grounds in Milford, Mich., and was impressed with the airy cabin, removable sky panels and expansive touchscreens. Yes, I crab walked, which felt like steering a pontoon boat, though I can see why it would be useful. Lucid Air Dream Performance The most beautiful sedan I tested all year, EV or otherwise. Unlike the futuristic Mercedes EQS — which is quite attractive — LucidÂ’s car is a blend of mid-century modern interior aesthetics and classic European exterior styling. When I walked up for my test drive, someone who IÂ’m pretty sure was comedian Jon Lovitz was sitting inside and taking it all in. As it sat in the valet of a hotel in a wealthy suburban enclave north of Detroit, the Lucid drew more attention than any of the Mercedes, Cadillacs or Lexus models passing by. The driving experience was enveloping. Starting at $169,000 for the Performance model (reservations are closed), the Lucid I sampled packed 1,111 hp and 471 miles of range. From the precise steering to the comfortable suspension, the dynamics were spot-on. It's a formidable product, and all the more impressive given itÂ’s LucidÂ’s first. Chevy Bolt EV The Bolt was the most pleasant surprise for me. It handled well, offered low-to-the-ground hot hatch dynamics and the steering was dialed-in. Adding a crossover variant for the new generation was a smart play. On a summer morning where I went to a first drive of the Ford Bronco at an off-road course, my hour-long commute in the Bolt was an enjoyable appetizer.  The Bolt was also my biggest disappointment due to its extensive recalls for fire risk. Ironically, I had the Bolt in my driveway when the initial recall went out for the previous generation (2017-19).

GM profit dips on truck changeover, but beats estimates

Thu, Apr 26 2018

DETROIT — General Motors on Thursday reported a higher-than-expected quarterly profit despite a drop in production of high-margin pickup trucks, as it gears up for new models that are expected to boost profits next year. Like rivals Ford and Fiat Chrysler Automobiles, GM is banking on highly-profitable Chevy Silverado and GMC Sierra pickup trucks to lift profits, as consumers shift away from traditional passenger cars in favor of these larger, more comfortable trucks, SUVs and crossovers. During the first quarter, the process of changing over to GM's new pickups resulted in a drop in production of 47,000 units. GM Chief Financial Officer Chuck Stevens said the production drop had resulted in a drop in pre-tax profit of up to $800 million. Earlier this year, GM said its 2018 profits would be flat compared with 2017, but expected its all-new pickup trucks would boost margins starting in 2019. On Thursday, GM reiterated its full-year 2018 forecast for adjusted earnings in a range from $6.30 to $6.60 per share. The automaker said capital expenditures were more than $500 million higher in the quarter because of investments its new pickup trucks and a family of low-cost vehicles under development with Chinese partner SAIC Motor Corp. On Wednesday, rival Ford said it would stop investing in most traditional passenger sedans in North America. CFO Stevens told reporters on Thursday that GM has "already indicated that we will make significantly lower investments on a go-forward basis" in sedans. 2019 GMC Sierra View 21 Photos GM benefited from a lower effective tax rate in the quarter, but adjusted pre-tax margin fell to 7.2 percent from 9.5 percent a year earlier. Stevens said the company's profit margin should hit 10 percent or higher in the second quarter and for the full year. GM said material costs were $700 million higher in the first quarter, and it expects those costs to continue rising. The automaker said it would counter those increases with cost cutting measures. "It is a more difficult environment than it was three or four months ago," Stevens said when asked about rising commodity prices from potential steel and aluminum tariffs announced by the Trump administration. "But we are confident we can continue to offset that." The company reported quarterly net income of $1.05 billion or $1.43 per share, a drop of nearly 60 percent from $2.61 billion or $1.75 per share a year earlier. Analysts had on average expected earnings per share of $1.24.