Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1999 Chevrolet Suburban 2500 on 2040-cars

US $4,900.00
Year:1999 Mileage:215079 Color: Red
Location:

617 Old Route 66, St Robert, Missouri, United States

617 Old Route 66, St Robert, Missouri, United States
1999 Chevrolet Suburban 2500, US $4,900.00, image 1
Advertising:
Fuel Type:Diesel
Engine:6.5L V8 16V DI OHV Turbo Diesel
Transmission:4-Speed Automatic
Condition: Used
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 3GNGK26F0XG151806
Stock Num: 14606-1
Make: Chevrolet
Model: Suburban 2500
Year: 1999
Exterior Color: Red
Options:
  • 4 Door
  • 4-wheel ABS Brakes
  • AM/FM stereo
  • Automatic locking hubs
  • Auxilliary transmission cooler
  • Cargo area light
  • Cargo tie downs
  • Chrome bumpers
  • Clock: In-radio display
  • Colored grille
  • Cupholders: Front
  • Curb weight: 4,769 lbs.
  • Daytime running lights
  • Diameter of tires: 16.0"
  • Door pockets: Driver
  • Engine immobilizer
  • Fixed antenna
  • Front and rear suspension stabilizer bars
  • Front bench
  • Front Head Room: 39.9"
  • Front Hip Room: 60.5"
  • Front Independent Suspension
  • Front Leg Room: 41.3"
  • Front reading lights
  • Front Shoulder Room: 65.0"
  • Front Ventilated disc brakes
  • Fuel Capacity: 42.0 gal.
  • Gross vehicle weight: 8,600 lbs.
  • HD front stabilizer bar
  • Independent front suspension classification
  • Leaf rear spring
  • Left rear passenger door type: Conventional
  • Manual driver mirror adjustment
  • Manual passenger mirror adjustment
  • Max cargo capacity: 150 cu.ft.
  • Other rear suspension
  • Other steering wheel trim
  • Overall height: 74.6"
  • Overall Length: 219.5"
  • Overall Width: 76.7"
  • Painted styled steel rims
  • Passenger Airbag
  • passenger and rear
  • Passenger vanity mirrors
  • Power door locks
  • Privacy glass: Light
  • Rear door type: Split swing-out
  • Rear Stabilizer Bar: Regular
  • Right rear passenger door type: Conventional
  • Rigid axle rear suspension
  • Spare Tire Mount Location: Inside
  • Speed-proportional power steering
  • Steel spare wheel rim
  • Suspension class: Regular
  • Tachometer
  • Three 12V DC power outlets
  • Tires: Prefix: LT
  • Tires: Profile: 75
  • Tires: Speed Rating: S
  • Tires: Width: 245 mm
  • Torsion bar front spring
  • Torsion front suspension
  • Total Number of Speakers: 4
  • Type of tires: AS
  • Variable intermittent front wipers
  • Vehicle Emissions: Federal
  • Vinyl floor covering
  • Vinyl seat upholstery
  • Wheelbase: 131.5"
Drive Type: 4WD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 215079

Auto Services in Missouri

Unnerstall Tire & Muffler ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Automobile Inspection Stations & Services
Address: 1 E 5th St, Innsbrook
Phone: (636) 239-5494

Tim`s Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 4101 Waco Rd Unit E, Centralia
Phone: (573) 474-6910

St Charles Foreign Car Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Used Car Dealers, Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: 1205 N 2nd St, Breckenridge-Hills
Phone: (636) 946-7023

Scherer Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 6447 State Highway H, Benton
Phone: (573) 545-4111

Rogers Auto Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Restoration-Antique & Classic
Address: 1809 N State Route 291, Peculiar
Phone: (816) 380-7200

Rev Diy Automotive Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Car Wash
Address: 1900 Old Saint James Rd, Vichy
Phone: (573) 458-0030

Auto blog

5 classic trucks and their polarizing modern revivals

Sun, Mar 3 2024

EVs are helping eliminate Detroit's gas-guzzling problem. Some revivals of gas-powered classics are getting the EV treatment.  But not every revived model looks exactly like its original counterpart. We're in a new era of hulking Detroit metal, and you can thank EVs. Americans can't get enough of their big, beefy trucks and SUVs. But for many years, some of the biggest gas guzzlers fell out of fashion as gas prices rose and emissions regulations tightened. But in the past few years, some of the most iconic American truck nameplates have been brought back to life with electric motors, like the GMC Hummer. In other cases, as with the Ford Bronco, improvements in engine technology and more interest in rugged adventure vehicles made a gas-powered revival possible. Even some revivals that started as gas-powered, like the Chevy Blazer and the Jeep Wagoneer, are now getting electrified spinoffs. (Even if they don't always look quite as sleek as their original inspiration.) Here are side-by-sides of five classic American trucks and their modern counterparts. The Jeep Wagoneer 1975 Jeep Wagoneer and 2024 Electric Jeep Wagoneer SStellantis After a long wait, Jeep released its revival of the classic Wagoneer and Grand Wagoneer in 2020. Starting later this year, an electric version of the luxury Jeep SUV will join the Wagoneer lineup. The Chevrolet Blazer A 1973 Chevrolet Blazer and a 2024 Chevrolet Blazer EVGetty Images, General Motors The Chevrolet Blazer was first rebooted in 2019 as a sporty family SUV. The modern Blazer shares zero resemblance to its boxy, off-roading older sibling, but it has still managed to become one of Chevy's more popular SUVs in recent years. The Blazer EV came later, and was one of the first models GM built on its new Ultium battery platform. The Hummer A Hummer H2 and the 2023 Hummer EV pickup truckGetty Images, General Motors Once the poster child for Detroit's big, bad gas guzzlers, the Hummer got new life as an electric pickup truck in 2021. The Ford Bronco A 1971 Ford Bronco and a 2022 Ford BroncoFord Motor Co. After a rouge group of engineers and designers inside Ford spent years trying to breathe life back into the Blue Oval's boxy off-roader, the Ford Bronco was finally resurrected in 2020 amid a rise in popularity for rugged adventure vehicles. The Ford Ranger 1985 Ford Ranger and a 2024 Ford RangerFord Motor Co.

GM learning from current Chevy Volt owners as it works on next-gen model

Tue, Sep 16 2014

Details of the second-generation Chevrolet Volt extended-range plug-in hybrid are coming in at a trickle, and the latest is that the 2016 model-year Volt will be improved in all meaningful areas, including performance and all-electric range, says General Motors powertrain director Larry Nitz. 60 percent of Volt customers only charge using a standard 110 outlet. Nitz was speaking to Autoline After Hours about the current and future Volt. He said that GM has been tracking Volt driving habits and found that about two-thirds of the Volts' collective miles are driven in electric mode, and that 81 percent of all Volt trips were done in pure EV mode. Additionally, Volt drivers plug the car in 10 times each week, on average. Nitz also said 82 percent of the Volt's commuting miles are coming from the plug instead of the gas tank. Oh, and 60 percent of Volt customers only charge using a standard 110 outlet. Last month, GM released a teaser shot of the 2016 Volt (above) and said the car would make its worldwide debut at the 2015 North American International Auto Show next January. Earlier this year, the Volt was reported to be getting a new chassis for the upcoming version. The Volt could use a bit of new life. Through August, Volt sales were down 12 percent from a year earlier to 13,146 units, and sales plunged 25 percent alone. That compares unfavorably to the Nissan Leaf battery-electric vehicle, whose 2014 sales have jumped 34 percent to almost 19,000 units. You can see Nitz dish the goods in the video below (Volt comments start at around minute 15). You will also notice AutoblogGreen contributor Gary Witzenburg talk about his history with the EV1 and share his take on the Volt. This content is hosted by a third party. To view it, please update your privacy preferences. Manage Settings.

GM won't really kill off the Chevy Volt and Cadillac CT6, will it?

Fri, Jul 21 2017

General Motors is apparently considering killing off six slow-selling models by 2020, according to Reuters. But is that really likely? The news is mentioned in a story where UAW president Dennis Williams notes that slumping US car sales could threaten jobs at low-volume factories. Still, we're skeptical that GM is really serious about killing those cars. Reuters specifically calls out the Buick LaCrosse, Cadillac CT6, Cadillac XTS, Chevrolet Impala, Chevrolet Sonic, and the Chevrolet Volt. Most of these have been redesigned or refreshed within the past few model years. Four - the LaCrosse, Impala, CT6, and Volt - are built in the Hamtramck factory in Detroit. That plant has made only 35,000 cars this year - down 32 percent from 2016. A typical GM plant builds 200,000-300,000 vehicles a year. Of all the cars Williams listed, killing the XTS, Impala, and Sonic make the most sense. They're older and don't sell particularly well. On the other hand, axing the other three seems like an odd move. It would leave Buick and Cadillac without flagship sedans, at least until the rumored Cadillac CT8 arrives. The CT6 was a big investment for GM and backing out after just a few years would be a huge loss. It also uses GM's latest and best materials and technology, making us even more skeptical. The Volt is a hugely important car for Chevrolet, and supplementing it with a crossover makes more sense than replacing it with one. Offering one model with a range of powertrain variants like the Hyundai Ioniq and Toyota Prius might be another route GM could take. All six of these vehicles are sedans, Yes, crossover sales are booming, but there's still a huge market for cars. Backing away from these would be essentially giving up sales to competitors from around the globe. The UAW might simply be publicly pushing GM to move crossover production to Hamtramck to avoid closing the plant and laying off workers. Sales of passenger cars are down across both GM and the industry. Consolidating production in other plants and closing Hamtramck rather than having a single facility focus on sedans might make more sense from a business perspective. GM is also trying to reduce its unsold inventory, meaning current production may be slowed or halted while current cars move into customer hands. There's a lot of politics that goes into building a car. GM wants to do what makes the most sense from a business perspective, while the UAW doesn't workers to lose their jobs when a factory closes.