Gmc Sierra 2500hd 6.6 Diesel Crew Cab Long Bed Rust Free Clean Truck!!!!!!!!!!!! on 2040-cars
Cynthiana, Kentucky, United States
Body Type:Pickup Truck
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:6.6 DURAMAX
Fuel Type:Diesel
For Sale By:Dealer
Make: Chevrolet
Model: Silverado 2500
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Trim: LS
Options: CD Player
Drive Type: 2WD
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag
Mileage: 140,942
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks
Exterior Color: White
Interior Color: Black
Number of Cylinders: 8
Disability Equipped: No
CLEAN STRAIGHT TRUCK HAS BEEN ADULT OWNED AND DRIVEN, TAKEN CARE OF VERY WELL AND IT SHOWS. NO RUST, ALL STOCK VEHICLE!!!! INTERIOR OF TRUCK IS SUPER CLEAN VERY NICE SEATS, HAS RUBBER FLOOR MAT TYPE FLOOR. AS CD PLAYER AM/FM RADIO, DUAL CONTROL AC/HEAT. TRUCK HAS LONG BED FOR ALL YOUR TOWING NEEDS, HAS NEVER BEEN 5TH WHEEL, OR GOOSE NECKED HAULED. DOES HAVE FACTORY TOW PACKAGE WITH TRAILER BRAKE INSTALLED. THIS DIESEL IS READY TO DRIVE HOME TO ANY LOCATION, GET IN AGO! CALL 859-588-4994 WITH ANY QUESTIONS.
Chevrolet Silverado 2500 for Sale
2005 chevrolet silverado 2500 ext. cab 4wd
2008 chevrolet silverado 2500 4wd ltz crew cab - duramax - lifted(US $38,498.00)
2009 4x4 4wd white v8 6.0l automatic leather crew cab pickup truck
Chevy crew cab duramax diesel 4x4 custom lift tires wheels low miles auto tow
2006 white ls!(US $23,792.00)
12 chevy silverado 2500hd duramax diesel 7.5" rough country lift black leather
Auto Services in Kentucky
Tire Discounters Inc ★★★★★
The Quick Lane Tire & Auto Center Of Winchester ★★★★★
T & T Transmission Service ★★★★★
Russell County Tire ★★★★★
ProTouch Quality Auto Cleaning Polishing & Window Tinting ★★★★★
Napa Auto Parts - Genuine Parts Company ★★★★★
Auto blog
General Motors and EVs: No stranger to firsts, but where's the leadership?
Tue, Apr 7 20152015 is already shaping up to be the year of "affordable, 200-mile EV" concepts. Nissan and Tesla have each been talking about them for some time, the latter promising to unveil its Model 3 at the North American International Auto Show in January before balking when the time came. Instead, Chevrolet beat them all by unveiling the Bolt concept at the same event, followed shortly thereafter with suggestions of a 2016 launch – potentially offering the first nationwide EV with anything close to that range. It was the ballsiest EV-related move General Motors has made in a quarter century. But will it remain so? Exactly 25 years before the Bolt rolled up onto the turntable, then-Chairman Roger Smith unveiled GM's last ground-up EV concept, the even-more-unfortunately-named Impact, at the Los Angeles Auto Show in January 1990. A few months later, he surprised most of his colleagues by announcing its intended production in honor of Earth Day. It was the first modern foray into electric vehicles for the US by any automaker, one that was rewarded by the State of California with what is now known as the Zero Emissions Vehicle mandate. The program not only forced other automakers into competing with Roger's pet project, but inspired all of them to fight it like small children against bedtime. Some years later, the drivers themselves weighed in, with a biting documentary about that obstinance and the leadership it cost both GM and the country. Within months, GM was first back into the fray of plug-in vehicles. Many criticized the company for starting with a PHEV rather than jump straight back into EVs. The choice wasn't totally out of the blue – even EV1 was meant to be followed by a PHEV. And especially on the heels of Who Killed the Electric Car?, some skittishness was understandable: even a successful EV would invite a "we told you so" public reaction, underscoring their mistake in ending the EV1 program. If a new EV didn't do well, they'd be convicted in the public eye as serial killers. All while seeking a federal bailout. For all the flak, the resulting Chevy Volt was and is a better car than GM has ever gotten credit for. But the company seemed to grow weary of having to overcome its varied past, and while the current owners remain happy, much of the stakeholder and community engagement that so effectively built early goodwill and sales growth faded not long after launch. Marketing has been spotty in both consistency and effectiveness.
Former Fisker CEO has some advice for Tesla Motors
Wed, Oct 22 2014Former Fisker Automotive CEO and ex-Chevrolet Volt vehicle-line director Tony Posawatz has some words of caution for Tesla Motors. The long-time automaker executive questions the California automaker's long-term viability – and gives some praise – in a talk with Benzinga, which you can listen to below. While the all-wheel-drive D that Tesla unveiled earlier this month in Southern California wowed a packed crowd, Posawatz (starting at around minute 4:45 in the interview) says Tesla would've been better off taking the resources it expended toward that Model S upgrade and directed them towards speeding up the development of a more affordable plug-in. Perhaps a number of investors agreed, since the company's stock fell the day after the D was announced. Posawatz says Tesla has been over-reliant on the sale of ZEV credits. Posawatz also says that Tesla has been over-reliant on the sale of zero-emissions vehicle credits in California for its earnings and questions whether the automaker will ever work at a large enough scale to sufficiently drive down costs and make consistent profits. Tesla CEO Elon Musk would take issue with this characterization. Posawatz first made his mark in the plug-in vehicle world when he was the vehicle-line director at General Motors for the Volt extended-range plug-in from 2006 to 2012. Later that year, he joined extended-range plug-in maker Fisker Automotive as its CEO, though quit that job during the summer of 2013 as the company was descending into insolvency. He joined the Electrification Coalition this past March. News Source: Benzinga Green Chevrolet Fisker Tesla Electric PHEV Tony Posawatz
GM's MPG overstatement could affect 2 million vehicles
Tue, May 17 2016Late last week, GM admitted that three of its large SUVs fuel economy window stickers did not match their actual efficiency ratings, and so the vehicles couldn't be sold. The stickers on the 2016 Chevy Traverse, GMC Acadia, and Buick Enclave said their ratings were one to two miles per gallon better than they should have been. Officially, the number of affected vehicles sits at about 60,000. But Consumer Reports makes a good point: what's up with all of the previous model year SUVs that are basically the same vehicle? To wit: the 2016 model year vehicles are not substantially different than the 2015 or the 2014, or even going all the way back to 2007. On the EPA's fuel economy website, all of these older models will "have better stated fuel economy numbers than the new vehicles in GM's dealerships," Consumer Reports noted. CR's best point, and the one that makes the 60,000 number potentially grow to 2 million if all of the vehicles built on this platform are affected, is that "[i]t seems unlikely that the company would change the powertrain on these carryover models so late in their model cycles in a way that would cause a dramatic, negative impact on fuel economy." GM says that earlier model year SUVs are not affected and the EPA did not respond to CR's question about the potential for more discrepancies. We've seen automakers reverse course before, so if GM has to come out with a mea culpa soon, don't be surprised. GM is rushing corrected stickers to dealers so that the SUVs can be sold again, but a fix for the already-sold vehicles could be trickier to solve. Related Video: Related Gallery 2013 GMC Acadia View 16 Photos News Source: Consumer Reports Government/Legal Green Buick Chevrolet GMC Fuel Efficiency mpg gmc acadia chevy traverse



















