Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1954 Chevy 4100 Dually "big Bolt" 1.5 Ton on 2040-cars

Year:1954 Mileage:0 Color: Blue /
 Blue
Location:

Cypress, Texas, United States

Cypress, Texas, United States
1954 Chevy 4100 Dually
Advertising:
Transmission:Manual
Body Type:Stake Bed Dually
Engine:235
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
VIN: N54K010455 Year: 1954
Interior Color: Blue
Make: Chevrolet
Number of Cylinders: 6
Model: Other Pickups
Trim: 4100
Drive Type: Rear Wheel
Mileage: 0
Exterior Color: Blue
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Condition: UsedA vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections.Seller Notes:"Strong Engine, Solid truck. Would make a great start to a hotrod or Restoration. Rear Window is cracked so it needs replacing. General Maintenance items needed (i.e. oil filters, etc.)"

$8,900 OBO - Will consider Trades

 Very good Condition!! 1954 Chevy 4100 "Big Bolt" 1 1/2 Ton Dually with Working Wood Dump Bed, Really Cool.

 Strong 235 Straight 6. older restoration. Rear window needs replacing (all other windows good)

 This baby runs really nice and strong. Very little that is not original. Great Hotrod potential. The original longer stake bed shortened for a really nice sportier look. Length of stake bed dump is about 7'.

 I would be interested in a Trade for a 1920's or 30's Ford or Chevy Hot Rod or Stock.

Title in Hand.  Truck is on Available to Purchase locally, so I reserve the right to end auction at any time. 


On Sep-29-13 at 21:01:03 PDT, seller added the following information:

If you need more photos, send email to BigboltChevy@aol.com

Auto Services in Texas

XL Parts ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories
Address: 2416 N Frazier St, Cut-And-Shoot
Phone: (936) 441-3500

XL Parts ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Parts, Supplies & Accessories-Wholesale & Manufacturers, Used & Rebuilt Auto Parts
Address: 6450 Midway Rd, Blue-Mound
Phone: (817) 924-0099

Wyatt`s Towing ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Towing, Locks & Locksmiths
Address: 1210 N US Highway 69, Flint
Phone: (903) 569-6060

vehiclebrakework ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair
Address: Aldine
Phone: (956) 251-3140

V G Motors ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automotive Tune Up Service, Automobile Air Conditioning Equipment-Service & Repair
Address: 10710 W Bellfort St, Houston
Phone: (281) 498-0909

Twin City Honda-Nissan ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 10549 Memorial Blvd, Monroe-City
Phone: (409) 981-1220

Auto blog

BMW, Hyundai score big in JD Power's first Tech Experience Index

Mon, Oct 10 2016

While automakers are quick to brag about winning a JD Power Initial Quality Study award, the reality, as we've pointed out before, is that these ratings are somewhat misleading, since IQS doesn't necessarily distinguish genuine quality issues. JD Power's new Tech Experience Index aims to solve that problem. The new metric takes the same 90-day approach as IQS but focuses exclusively on technology – collision protection, comfort and convenience, driving assistance, entertainment and connectivity, navigation, and smartphone mirroring. It splits the industry up into just seven segments, based loosely on size, which is why the Chevrolet Camaro is in the same division (mid-size) as Kia Sorento and the Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class is in the same segment as the Hyundai Genesis (mid-size premium). It makes for some screwy bedfellows, to be sure. Still, splitting tech experience away from initial quality should allow customers to make more informed and intelligent decisions when buying new vehicles. In the inaugural study, respondents listed BMW and Hyundai as the big winners, with two segment awards – the 2 Series for small premium and the 4 Series for compact premium, and the Genesis for mid-size premium and Tucson for small segment. The Chevrolet Camaro (midsize), Kia Forte (compact), and Nissan Maxima (large) scored individual wins. Ford also had a surprising hit with the Lincoln MKC, which ranked third in the compact premium segment behind the 4 Series and Lexus IS. This is a coup for the Blue Oval, whose woeful MyFord Touch systems made the brand a victim of the IQS' flaws in the early 2010s. But Ford and other automakers might not want to celebrate just yet. According to JD Power, there's still a lot of room for improvement – navigation systems were the lowest-rated piece of tech in the study. Instead, customers repeatedly saluted collision-avoidance and safety systems, giving the category the best marks of the study and listing blind-spot monitoring and backup cameras as two must-have features – 96 percent of respondents said they wanted those two systems in their next vehicle. But this isn't really a surprise. Implementation of safety systems from brand to brand is similar, and they don't require any input from users, unlike navigation and infotainment systems which are frustratingly deep.

This is your 2014 Chevrolet SS

Sat, 16 Feb 2013

Think you've waited long enough for this? If so, then you'll want to savor the high-res photos we've so far been given of the 2014 Chevrolet SS, the first rear-wheel-drive performance sedan from The Bowtie in 17 years.
We all know its our version of the brand new VF-model Holden Commodore, but what's under the hood that earns the appellation "performance?" A 6.2-liter LS3 V8 engine producing 415 horsepower and 415 pound-feet of torque. That's 35 hp and lb-ft less than the same engine is expected to produce in the 2014 Chevrolet Corvette. Chevrolet says the sedan will get from 0-to-60 miles per hour "in about five seconds."
Shifting comes courtesy of a six-speed automatic with paddles on the steering wheel, while stopping arrive via four-piston Brembo calipers up front, a single sliding piston in back. The forged aluminum wheels are 19-inchers all around, each set supporting right around 50 percent of the sedan's weight, and the aluminum hood and trunk are meant to keep the center of gravity low.

Impala SS vs. Marauder: Recalling Detroit’s muscle sedans 

Thu, Apr 30 2020

Impala SS vs. Marauder — it was comparo that only really happened in theory. ChevyÂ’s muscle sedan ran from 1994-96, while MercuryÂ’s answer arrived in 2003 and only lasted until 2004. TheyÂ’re linked inextricably, as there were few options for powerful American sedans during that milquetoast period for enthusiasts. The debate was reignited recently among Autoblog editors when a pristine 1996 Chevy Impala SS with just 2,173 miles on the odometer hit the market on Bring a Trailer. Most of the staff favored the Impala for its sinister looks and said that it lived up to its billing as a legit muscle car. Nearly two-thirds of you agree. We ran an unscientific Twitter poll that generated 851 votes, 63.9 percent of which backed the Impala. Muscle sedans, take your pick: — Greg Migliore (@GregMigliore) April 14, 2020 Then and now enthusiasts felt the Impala was a more complete execution with guts. The Marauder, despite coming along later, felt more hacked together, according to prevailing sentiments. Why? On purpose and on paper theyÂ’re similar. The ImpalaÂ’s 5.7-liter LT1 V8 making 260 horsepower and 330 pound-feet of torque was impressive for a two-ton sedan in the mid-Â’90s. The Marauder was actually more powerful — its 4.6-liter V8 was rated at 302 hp and 318 lb-ft. The ImpalaÂ’s engine was also used in the C4 Corvette. The MarauderÂ’s mill was shared with the Mustang Mach 1. You can see why they resonated so deeply with Boomers longing for a bygone era and also captured the attention of coming-of-age Gen Xers. Car and DriverÂ’s staff gave the Marauder a lukewarm review back in ‘03, citing its solid handling and features, yet knocking the sedan for being slow off the line. In a Hemmings article appropriately called “Autopsy” from 2004, the ImpalaÂ’s stronger low-end torque and smooth shifting transmission earned praise, separating it from the more sluggish Mercury. All of this was captured in the carsÂ’ acceleration times, highlighting metrically the differences in their character. The Impala hit 60 miles per hour in 6.5 seconds, while the Marauder was a half-second slower, according to C/D testing. Other sites have them closer together, which reinforces the premise it really was the little things that separated these muscle cars. Both made the most of their genetics, riding on ancient platforms (FordÂ’s Panther and General MotorsÂ’ B-body) that preceded these cars by decades. Both had iconic names.