Up for sale is a 86 Monte Carlo SS, this is one of my customers car. I have been the number one person that's worked on this sweet ride since 2000 after it was repainted. It is a 5.0 H.O car with some sweet mods. Rear end is a 8.5 with a 373 pos, the trans was pulled an redone with all the up dates that's out there today for a 700r an 2200 stall. The motor block is the numbers matching to the car with, rods are GM performance, hard crank, an 10.5.1 keith black pistons. The cam is a comp 477/488 flat tap cam an lifter. The heads are GM Aluminium performance vortech, intake is a welden performer and has a 750 holly. It also has a comp fire ball 6A ignition, oh the a/c compressor an lines are in trunk. I'm sure I'm missing something so just contact me. 770-324-9323 Relisting do to no payment But we did find the build sheet for all the work done to the car MOTOR, Troker 2 edelbrock intake $154.97, Holly 750 $499.97, Carter fuel pump $85.97, Hooker headers $459.97, Crane Hi-6 ignition control box $249.88, Master HT starter $124.97, vortech heads ex 1.60 intake 2.02 165 runners $697, forged crank 750 hp $931.00, GM I-beam 4340 steel 700 hp $409.97, KB pistions 10.5.1 30 over flat tops $216.97, Melling oil pump kit $99.97, crane cam 218/218 477/488 kit $325.92, Howards pushrods $64.97, cloyes timing set $81.97, Proform water pump $81.98, B&M flexplate $89.97, edelbrock valve covers $284.97, Machine work $375.00, gaskit kit $198.15, arp head bolts $49.95, arp main bolts $94.25, Labor for building motor $500.00 Total Cost of motor $6077.77 Tansmission, Hughes master overhaul kit $409.97, B&M converter $370.97 Labor $325. Total $1105.94 Rearend, Moser c-clip axles $259.97, arp wheel studs $105.97, Seals $69.00, Labor $465, Total $899.94 So you can tell there was a lot of money put into this car!!!! $8083.65!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
Chevrolet Monte Carlo for Sale
Auto Services in Georgia
York`s Garage ★★★★★
Unique Way Custom Automotive ★★★★★
U-Save Auto Rental ★★★★★
Troncalli All-Serv ★★★★★
Trinity Mobile Automotive ★★★★★
Top Quality Car Care ★★★★★
Auto blog
2014 Chevrolet SS makes its live debut
Sat, 16 Feb 2013Chevrolet showed off the new 2014 SS in an airport hangar last night, its first rear-wheel-drive performance sedan in the US since the Impala SS from 1997. We'll have more to say about the SS later today, but this is the sedan that Chevrolet sees as the final piece in restoring its performance credentials. For those of you looking for a manual transmission, however, that wish will go unfulfilled - at least for now: the only two options buyers will have are the color and whether or not they want a sunroof.
We'll work on getting some more angles (in better light) today at Daytona International Speedway, but with fans seeing the car for the first time, we don't hold out much luck of getting a clear shot. So for now, enjoy the high-res gallery above.
Chevy SS prototype spotted wearing Pontiac G8 clothes
Tue, 28 Aug 2012
Do not adjust your computer screen, you are not seeing the rebirth of the Pontiac brand. General Motors has chosen to use a G8 to disguise a test mule for the latest prototype of the forthcoming Chevrolet SS. The G8 was closely related to the Holden Commodore and Vauxhall VXR, the platform upon which the new Chevrolet performance model will be based. It should come as little surprise, then, that GM has opted to use the cladding from the former G8.
Thought the front clip of this mule is pure Pontiac, note the vents immediately behind the front wheel. That is a distinctive design hallmark of the Vauxhall VXR. Also note that this vehicle is right-hand drive, as the Holden and its Chevy counterpart will be very closely related. That likely includes potential drivetrains. The spy photos of this mule also reveal very wide rear tires, and rear wheels that do not match the fronts.
Consumer Reports criticizes small turbo engines for misleading performance, fuel economy claims [w/video]
Tue, 05 Feb 2013Consumer Reports has taken aim at at small-displacement, forced-induction engines, saying the powerplants don't manage to deliver on automaker fuel economy claims. Manufacturers have long held that smaller, turbocharged engines pack all power of their larger displacement cousins with significantly better fuel economy, but the research organization says that despite scoring high EPA economy numbers, the engines are no better than conventional drivetrains in both categories. Jake Fisher, director of automotive testing for Consumer Reports, says the forced induction options "are often slower and less fuel efficient than larger four and six-cylinder engines."
Specifically, CR calls out the new Ford Fusion equipped with the automaker's Ecoboost 1.6-liter four-cylinder engine. The institute's researchers found the engine, which is a $795 option over the base 2.5-liter four-cylinder, fails to match competitors in acceleration and served up 25 miles per gallon in testing, putting the sedan dead last among other midsize options.
The Chevrolet Cruze, Hyundai Sonata Turbo and Ford Escape 2.0T all got dinged for the same troubles, though Consumer Reports has found the turbo 2.0-liter four-cylinder in the BMW 328i does deliver on its promises. You can check out the full press release below. You can also read the full study on the Consumer Reports site, or scroll down for a short video recap.