Chevy Short Panel Van No Windows Factory 4 Speed Manual!! 110" Wheel Base A Team on 2040-cars
Hawley, Minnesota, United States
Engine:350
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
Year: 1985
Number of Cylinders: 8
Make: Chevrolet
Model: G20 Van
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Drive Type: 4 Speed Manual Factory
Options: Cassette Player
Mileage: 85,280
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control
Exterior Color: Galaxy Blue Metallic Factory
Interior Color: Tan
Trim: Shaggin wagon
Here we have this wonderful piece of van history, a must have for any true van enthusiast! I have owned this van for a little under 2 years and which before I bought it from the original owner! This machine has never once set foot on the road in the winter months in its lifetime. The original owner was extremely particular and passionate about this machine, still has every service/part receipt since 1985 when he bought it! The overall condition of this van is proof of this, its all original inside and out. I would consider it an 8.5 out of 10, it has the usual road wear and the sliding door is the only victim of rust on the lower bottom. Other then that the sheet metal is in exceptional shape for a panel van, super straight! Its a factory 110" wheel base with no windows, original 4 on the floor transmission. The original 5.0 V8 was replaced with a GM Goodrich 350HO by the original owner. At that time it was fitted with an Edelbrock Intake, Holley 650 carb, MSD Ignition, long tube headers and new duel exhaust with thrush mufflers. To put this new found power down the van is equipped with factory sway bar, Koni shocks up front, air shocks in the back with traction bars, then to wrap it up set of deep original Cragar 15x10's and 15X8's with brand new Hancook Tires. To keep those big meats covered up it has color matched fender flares installed at the factory, along with this the factory door extender for the sliding door. Inside there are two captain swivel chairs for seating, factory tilt steering with removable steering wheel, factory A/C to keep you cool and cruise control (Cruise control does not work at the moment, needs to be hooked up to the new Holley). Also the speedometer stopped working shortly after I purchased the van (I believe it is the connection to the transmission). The van was also ordered with heavy duty brakes and suspension (3/4 ton aka Heavy 1/2 ton), along with this it is fitted with a heavy duty hitch and trailer brakes. It comes with the original factory rally rims, which are practically brand new. This is a real piece of history and extremely rare due to the factory 4 speed/short wheelbase no window combination. There is much more that I am probably forgetting in this description but just feel free to ask if you have any questions! |
Chevrolet G20 Van for Sale
1995 chevy high top conversion van , 35k original miles , mint !!
1995 chevrolet g20 sportvan extended passenger van 3-door 5.7l + great paint(US $3,600.00)
1978 chevrolet g20 3/4 ton van with sliding side door(US $1,995.00)
1991 g30 conversion van 6,549 actual miles 117 pictures and hd video no reserve
1994 chevy van
1997 chevrolet g20 van
Auto Services in Minnesota
T K Automotive ★★★★★
Steve`s Alignment Service ★★★★★
St. Paul Automotive ★★★★★
R.B. Auto ★★★★★
R & S Automotive ★★★★★
Napa Auto Parts - Genuine Parts Company ★★★★★
Auto blog
GM recalling over 243,000 crossovers over possible seat belt defect
Tue, 17 Aug 20102010 Buick Enclave - Click above for high-res image gallery
The summer of 2010's recall hit parade continues unabated today, with General Motors having just announced that it is asking 243,403 owners of its 2009-2010 Lambda crossovers to bring their three-row haulers in for inspection. The culprit? Second-row seat belts in select Buick Enclave, Chevrolet Traverse, GMC Acadia, and Saturn Outlook CUVs have "failed to perform properly in a crash."
According to GM, a second-row seat-side trim piece is to blame, as it can impede the upward rotation of the buckle after the seat is folded flat. As a result, if the buckle makes contact with the seat frame, cosmetic damage can occur, potentially requiring additional force to operate the buckle properly. So far, no great shakes, but in the process of applying that additional force, the occupant may push the buckle cover down to the strap, potentially revealing and depressing the red release button. As a result of this, the belt may not latch, or in certain cases, it may actually appear to be latched when, in fact, it isn't.
Mary Barra reportedly confirms GM's electric pickup truck plans
Tue, Apr 30 2019According to Motor Authority, CEO Mary Barra confirmed General Motors' intentions to build an electric pickup truck this week. Whether or not it would be an all-new vehicle is unknown. The news comes not even a week after Ford announced a $500 million investment in electric-vehicle startup Rivian. First, electric powertrains were integrated into cars. Then came the crossovers and the SUVs. Naturally, then, the next wave will be pickup trucks. Ford is set to produce an electric F-150, Rivian has the R1T, and now General Motors has reportedly confirmed its plans to introduce a competitor into the field. The article says the topic was brought up in a recent investor call as part of a brief overview of the automaker's electrification strategy. That's where the details end, however, as there is no indication of a timeline, what GM brand would carry the truck, or whether it would be an entirely new product or an adaptation of a current model. The latter seems most likely, which points to the Chevrolet Silverado or the GMC Sierra as possibilities. Chevrolet has been GM's electrification leader this decade with the Bolt and Volt, so an electric Silverado would align well with that messaging and branding. However, an electric pickup would likely be a pricier premium product, which could align it better with GMC. Autoblog has reached out to GM for comment and will update this space when we get a response. Green Rumormill Chevrolet GMC Truck Electric Future Vehicles Mary Barra electric truck chevrolet silverado
Impala SS vs. Marauder: Recalling Detroit’s muscle sedans
Thu, Apr 30 2020Impala SS vs. Marauder — it was comparo that only really happened in theory. ChevyÂ’s muscle sedan ran from 1994-96, while MercuryÂ’s answer arrived in 2003 and only lasted until 2004. TheyÂ’re linked inextricably, as there were few options for powerful American sedans during that milquetoast period for enthusiasts. The debate was reignited recently among Autoblog editors when a pristine 1996 Chevy Impala SS with just 2,173 miles on the odometer hit the market on Bring a Trailer. Most of the staff favored the Impala for its sinister looks and said that it lived up to its billing as a legit muscle car. Nearly two-thirds of you agree. We ran an unscientific Twitter poll that generated 851 votes, 63.9 percent of which backed the Impala. Muscle sedans, take your pick: — Greg Migliore (@GregMigliore) April 14, 2020 Then and now enthusiasts felt the Impala was a more complete execution with guts. The Marauder, despite coming along later, felt more hacked together, according to prevailing sentiments. Why? On purpose and on paper theyÂ’re similar. The ImpalaÂ’s 5.7-liter LT1 V8 making 260 horsepower and 330 pound-feet of torque was impressive for a two-ton sedan in the mid-Â’90s. The Marauder was actually more powerful — its 4.6-liter V8 was rated at 302 hp and 318 lb-ft. The ImpalaÂ’s engine was also used in the C4 Corvette. The MarauderÂ’s mill was shared with the Mustang Mach 1. You can see why they resonated so deeply with Boomers longing for a bygone era and also captured the attention of coming-of-age Gen Xers. Car and DriverÂ’s staff gave the Marauder a lukewarm review back in ‘03, citing its solid handling and features, yet knocking the sedan for being slow off the line. In a Hemmings article appropriately called “Autopsy” from 2004, the ImpalaÂ’s stronger low-end torque and smooth shifting transmission earned praise, separating it from the more sluggish Mercury. All of this was captured in the carsÂ’ acceleration times, highlighting metrically the differences in their character. The Impala hit 60 miles per hour in 6.5 seconds, while the Marauder was a half-second slower, according to C/D testing. Other sites have them closer together, which reinforces the premise it really was the little things that separated these muscle cars. Both made the most of their genetics, riding on ancient platforms (FordÂ’s Panther and General MotorsÂ’ B-body) that preceded these cars by decades. Both had iconic names.
2040Cars.com © 2012-2025. All Rights Reserved.
Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.
Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of the 2040Cars User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
0.043 s, 7902 u