Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

El Camino On 22"s Super Cheap With No Reserve!!!!!starting Bid Reduced!!! on 2040-cars

Year:1981 Mileage:38675
Location:

Burbank, California, United States

Burbank, California, United States
Advertising:


1981 CHEVY EL CAMINO 

AS REAL AS IT GETS!!!

ONCHROME  22'S WITH GOOD TIRES

VIPER ALARM WITH ENGINE START!!!

HAS A COUPLE OF SCRATCHES/CLEAR COAT FADE(SPOT) 

DUE TO EVERYDAY WEAR AND TEAR NOTHING SERIOUS PICS ATTACHED,

A/C HAS TO BE CLEANED,CHARGED AND CONNECTED,ALSO DUE TO HAVING A BNEW CARB 

ALSO NEEDS FINE TUNNING (as per to my mechanic it is just to be re jetted...)

HAS LSD,FLOWMASTER EXHAUST SYSTEM,HEADERS,EDDLEBROCK CARB/CLEANER,TONNEAU COVER AND,

WOOD STEERING,LEATHER SEATS,WILL THROW IN THE KICKER SOUND SYSTEM-SUBWOOFER,AMP AND SPEAKERS IF YOU WOULD WANT THEM...

ALSO HAS THE DVD SUN VISOR MONITOR FOR DRIVER /PASSENGER SIDE!!!

I WILL TRY MY BEST TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS SO LET ME KNOW...

ALSO HAS THE BACK UP CAMERA MOUNTED ON TAIL GATE!!!

THIS CAR HAS BEEN VERY WELL SPENT ON AND IN MY OPINION!!!

"THESE DEALS DON'T COME BY DAILY

"HAPPY VIEWING (",)


Fifth generation (1978–1987)

The 1978 through 1987 El Caminos were produced in four trim levels: Classic, Black Knight (1978)/Royal Knight (1979–83), Conquista and Super Sport, and shared chassis components with the Chevrolet Malibu. Chevrolet 90° V6 and Buick V6 engines were used for the first time. The optional 305 cubic-inch small block V8 was rated at 150 or 165 horsepower (123 kW), and from 1982–1984, the Oldsmobile-sourced Diesel engine was also optional.

1979 El Camino

A new, trimmer El Camino was unveiled in 1978, adopting the new, more sharp-edged Malibu styling, and a one-inch longer wheelbase of 117 in (2,972 mm). The front end sheet metal was shared with the Malibu, the doors with the Monte Carlo, and the rear tailgate and bumper was shared with the Malibu station wagon. For the first time, though, the El Camino had a unique chassis - it was shared with no other Chevrolet. The front end featured a new single rectangular headlight design. The base engine was a 200-cubic-inch (3.3-liter) V6 that developed 95 horsepower (71 kW), except in California where, to meet emissions standards, the 231-cubic-inch Buick engine was the base engine . Two upgrades could be ordered: a 305-cubic-inch V8 with 145 horsepower (108 kW), or a 350-cubic-inch V8 with 170 horsepower (130 kW) that was only available in El Caminos and Malibu station wagons. It was not available on Malibu passenger cars. Among GM makes, at least, the era of bigness was fading into history, overtaken by a new age of efficiency and economy.

The 1979 model got minimal changes following its debut as a redesigned "new-size" model in 1978. Alterations to the 1979 El Camino amounting to little more than a new divided grille. However, a "small-block" 267-cubic-inch (4.4-liter) V8 joined the options list and slotted between the standard 3.3-liter V6 and the optional 5.0-liter four-barrel V8. The 350-cubic-inch (5.7-liter) V8, developing 170 horsepower (130 kW) was again available. Both three- and four-speed manual transmissions had floor shifters.

The 1980 El Camino started out the 1980s with few changes, though engine choices were shuffled a little. The base V6 displaced 229 cubic inches, up from 200 the year before. Horsepower increased from 94 to 115. Optional again were a 267-cubic-inch V8 with 125 horsepower (93 kW) and a 305 V8, now with 155 horsepower (down five). The 350 with 170 horsepower (130 kW) offered in 1979 was dropped. A three speed floor shifted manual transmission was standard, but most got the optional three-speed automatic.

The 1981 models received a new horizontal tube grill. The 1981 engines mostly continued from 1980, but now used GM's Computer Command Control (CCC) emission system. The base 229-cubic-inch V6 made 110 horsepower (down from 115), as did the California-only 231-cubic-inch Buick V6. Optional engines were the 267-cubic-inch V8 with 115 horsepower (86 kW) and The 305-cubic-inch V8, now with 150 horsepower (110 kW). The three-speed automatic added a lock-up torque converter to aid highway mileage.

The 1982 (through the final 1987) El Camino sported a frontal appearance with a crosshatch grille flanked by quad rectangular headlights. New under the hood for 1982 was a 105-horsepower 5.7-liter (350-cubic-inch) Diesel V8, which was also offered in Chevy's full-size cars. Though mileage with the diesel was commendable, it was an expensive option and would eventually amass a dismal repair record. Gasoline-engine choices were unchanged, except Chevy's 229-cubic-inch (3.8-liter) V6 was now standard in California-bound cars, replacing Buick's 231-cubic-inch V6.

In 1983, the 4.4-liter V8 was gone, leaving the 5.0-liter version as the only optional gas V8. The standard engine was again Chevy's 3.8-liter V6 with 110 horsepower (82 kW), though California cars, once again, got a Buick V6 with similar specifications. Continuing on the options list was the 5.7-liter V8 Diesel with 105 hp (78 kW). The sister Malibu sedan and wagon were discontinued after the 1983 model year.

The 1984-87 El Camino SS was offered as a conversion (completed by Choo-Choo Customs Inc., of Chattanooga, Tennessee) to include the aerodynamic front end similar to the Monte Carlo SS, but did not receive the L69 engine package. For 1985, GM shifted El Camino production to Mexico, and the new 4.3 L was standard through 1987.


1981 CHEVY EL CAMINO ON 22'S HAS A COUPLE OF SCRATCHES DUE TO EVERYDAY WEAR AND TEAR PICS ATTACHED,A/C HAS TO BE CLEANED,CHARGED AD CONNECTED,ALSO DUE TO HAVING A BNEW CARB ALSO NEEDS FINE TUNNING...HAS LSD,FLOWMASTER EXHAUST SYSTEM,HEADERS,EDDLEBROCK CARB/CLEANER,TONNEAU COVER AND A LOT MORE!!!

WOOD STEERING LEATHER SEATS,

I WILL TRY MY BEST TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS SO LET ME KNOW...

THIS CAR HAS BEEN VERY WELL SPENT ON AND IN MY OPINION

 "THESE DEALS DON'T COME BY DAILY"


WANT TO GET AT LEAST $12,500 FOR IT W/C IS A FRACTION OF EXPENSES/UPGRADE ON VEHICLE
BUT LIKE I SAID NO RESERVE!!!!
GRAB IT NOW!!!

COMPARE VEHICLE & LOAD!!!

HAPPY VIEWING (",)


**** ITEM SOLD AS IS WITH NO WARRANTY ****


ACT NOW ALSO SELING LOCALLY!!!

1982-1987 El Camino

Auto Services in California

Woody`s Auto Body and Paint ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Truck Body Repair & Painting
Address: 9020 Gardendale St, Santa-Fe-Springs
Phone: (562) 633-3813

Westside Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube, Brake Repair
Address: 115 McPherson St, Davenport
Phone: (831) 600-7074

West Coast Auto Body ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Truck Body Repair & Painting
Address: 15144 Valley Blvd, Cerritos
Phone: (626) 961-2779

Webb`s Auto & Truck ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 2146 S Atlantic Blvd, Bell-Gardens
Phone: (323) 268-1266

VRC Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 2409 Main St, Moreno-Valley
Phone: (951) 276-3280

Visions Automotive Glass ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Glass-Auto, Plate, Window, Etc, Glass-Automobile, Plate, Window, Etc-Manufacturers
Address: 8698 Elk Grove Blvd #1-238, Walnut-Grove
Phone: (877) 312-0678

Auto blog

Compact SUV Comparison: Specs, pics and reviews of every brand's crossover

Wed, Jul 25 2018

Honda CR-V vs Toyota RAV4. Chevy Equinox vs Ford Escape. Mazda CX-5 vs Subaru Forester. Whichever combinations of compact crossover SUV you're considering, there's probably a comparison test or chart out there to read. Heck, you can even create a three-car comparison yourself here at Autoblog. However, if you want a bunch of that information all in one convenient place, well, here it is. Our mega comparison of specs, features and photos of compact SUV entries from every mainstream manufacturer that sells them. That includes the 2018 Chevrolet Equinox, 2018 Ford Escape, 2018 GMC Terrain, 2018 Honda CR-V, 2018 Hyundai Tucson, 2019 Jeep Cherokee (it's already on sale with notable changes from 2018), 2018 Jeep Compass, 2018 Kia Sportage, 2018 Mazda CX-5, 2018 Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross (none of Mitsu's SUVs are perfect fits for this segment, so we deemed the MEC the most competitive fit), 2018 Nissan Rogue, 2018 Subaru Forester, 2018 Toyota RAV4 and 2018 Volkswagen Tiguan. We can update this comparison as more information about 2019 models is released, most notably the Forester and RAV4. Now, there are certainly some models that are smaller (Nissan Rogue Sport) or larger (Kia Sorento) that could also be considered, but we figured it was wise to stick with those in this sweet spot of comparable size and price. We also included links to Autoblog reviews, buying guides and smaller comparisons. Engines and Transmissions With rare exception, this segment features four-cylinder power. Sometimes it's turbocharged, often its not, but standard engine outputs are generally in the same ballpark. Therefore, we'd recommend focusing on torque output, as it's what will make a difference around town or when passing, and weighing that versus fuel economy (the Chevy Equinox, GMC Terrain, Honda CR-V and Mazda CX-5 make particularly strong cases in this regard). Many drivers aren't too fond of continuously variable transmissions (CVT), either, so that's another thing to consider and note during a test drive. As you can see, several models are available with performance upgrades. Besides the Jeep Cherokee's available V6, all are more powerful turbocharged four-cylinder engines. The exception to this would be the Honda CR-V and Ford Escape, as their 1.5-liter turbo engines don't prioritize performance. Instead, they serve as overall upgrades to the base naturally aspirated engines standard on only their base trim levels (CR-V LX and Escape S).

Here are a few of our automotive guilty pleasures

Tue, Jun 23 2020

It goes without saying, but I'll say it anyway. The world is full of cars, and just about as many of them are bad as are good. It's pretty easy to pick which fall into each category after giving them a thorough walkaround and, more important, driving them. But every once in a while, an automobile straddles the line somehow between good and bad — it may be hideously overpriced and therefore a marketplace failure, it may be stupid quick in a straight line but handles like a drunken noodle, or it may have an interior that looks like it was made of a mess of injection-molded Legos. Heck, maybe all three. Yet there's something special about some bad cars that actually makes them likable. The idea for this list came to me while I was browsing classified ads for cars within a few hundred miles of my house. I ran across a few oddballs and shared them with the rest of the team in our online chat room. It turns out several of us have a few automotive guilty pleasures that we're willing to admit to. We'll call a few of 'em out here. Feel free to share some of your own in the comments below. Dodge Neon SRT4 and Caliber SRT4: The Neon was a passably good and plucky little city car when it debuted for the 1995 model year. The Caliber, which replaced the aging Neon and sought to replace its friendly marketing campaign with something more sinister, was panned from the very outset for its cheap interior furnishings, but at least offered some decent utility with its hatchback shape. What the two little front-wheel-drive Dodge models have in common are their rip-roarin' SRT variants, each powered by turbocharged 2.4-liter four-cylinder engines. Known for their propensity to light up their front tires under hard acceleration, the duo were legitimately quick and fun to drive with a fantastic turbo whoosh that called to mind the early days of turbo technology. — Consumer Editor Jeremy Korzeniewski  Chevrolet HHR SS: Chevy's HHR SS came out early in my automotive journalism career, and I have fond memories of the press launch (and having dinner with Bob Lutz) that included plenty of tire-smoking hard launches and demonstrations of the manual transmission's no-lift shift feature. The 260-horsepower turbocharged four-cylinder was and still is a spunky little engine that makes the retro-inspired HHR a fun little hot rod that works quite well as a fun little daily driver.

Canada opens probe into 250,000 GM pickups, SUVs over brake performance

Sun, Jun 23 2019

Transport Canada, the auto safety regulator, has opened a probe into braking issues in nearly 250,000 General Motors full-size pickups and SUVs after U.S. officials launched a similar probe last year, the agency said on its website. The U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) in November into 2.73 million U.S. 2014-2016 model year SUVs and pickups after receiving 487 reports of hard brake pedal effort accompanied by extended stopping distance that were attributed to deterioration of the engine-driven brake assist vacuum pump. Transport Canada's probe covers 249,700 2015 through 2017 model year vehicles including the Cadillac Escalade, Chevrolet Suburban, Chevrolet Tahoe and GMC Yukon as well as 2014-2017 Chevrolet Silverado LD and GMC Sierra LD vehicles. The U.S. agency said it had reports of nine incidents of vehicles incurring damage as a result of colliding with another vehicle or fixed object at low speeds and reports of two injuries. NHTSA said if the pump fails to operate, the amount of brake power assist can be significantly reduced, extending vehicle stopping distance. The NHTSA sent GM an information request in a Feb. 7 letter. A GM spokesman said he had no update on the investigation. Reporting by David Shepardson; editing by Jonathan Oatis