2011 Chevrolet Camaro on 2040-cars
Curtis Bay, Maryland, United States
3.6 V6 6-speed Manual with 3.27 Limited Slip Rear
SS Front Fascia with ACS functional "Mail Slot" vent
Ported (port matched with the heads) and powder coated Intake manifold
Ported GM Throttle Body
CAI cold air induction air intake
Nitrous Outlet's complete 3.6 V6 wet plate system including custom bottle mount, heater, purge
and console controls and progressive controller from 75hp-125hp at the wheels. Currently have 75HP jets installed.
Shot once.
BBK Long Tube Headers (ceramic coated) with BBK high flow cats, ARP stainless steel header
bolts
Professionally Tuned by Vince @ Trificta Tune
Kook's Cat-Back Stainless Steel Exhaust System
SS lower rear fascia
Blacked out rear lens bezels
HID headlights
Gloss Black painted RS/SS Fog lights with high output LEDs
Forgeline Custom 20" forged wheels (with TPMS sensors installed)
New Nitto NT05 Tires (Front = 20"x9.5" w/275/40ZR20 / Rear = 20"x11" w/315/35ZR20) nothing rubs
New GM SS Front & Rear Brembo Calipers w/DBA 4000 Series Slotted rotors. Stainless steel brake
lines all around
MTI "Six Shooter" Shifter. HD Transmission mount
Pfadt solid motor mounts
Leather steering wheel and leather center console lid
GM RS Gauge Package
Eibach Pro-Kit Performance Lowered Springs (kit# 38143.140)
GM SS Shocks/Struts
LG Motorsports G5 Full Chassis Brace
BMR bushings, rear trailing arms
Pedders EP1200 Rear Cross Member Insert
SLP Underdrive Pully etc,
Chevrolet Camaro for Sale
1968 chevrolet camaro(US $19,040.00)
1967 chevrolet camaro ss 396 with 350 sbc(US $15,200.00)
2010 chevrolet camaro 2ss(US $17,280.00)
1973 chevrolet camaro z28(US $26,080.00)
1969 chevrolet camaro(US $24,960.00)
2002 chevrolet camaro z28(US $23,995.00)
Auto Services in Maryland
Wes Greenway`s Waldorf VW ★★★★★
Virginia Tire & Auto of Ashburn/Dulles ★★★★★
The Body Works of VA INC ★★★★★
Streavig`s Service Center ★★★★★
Southern Stables Automotive ★★★★★
Sedlak Automotive, LLC ★★★★★
Auto blog
2014 Chevrolet Cruze TD fires up its new diesel motor
Thu, 07 Feb 2013Ever since General Motors confirmed plans to produce a diesel-powered Cruze back in 2011, we've been eagerly awaiting its arrival. And as part of the 2013 Chicago Auto Show, Chevrolet has pulled back the cover on its oil-burning compact sedan, set to go on sale in the near future with a starting price of $25,695, not including $810 for destination.
The heart and soul of the Cruze TD (that's its official name) is a 2.0-liter turbo-diesel inline four-cylinder engine rated at 148 horsepower and 258 pound-feet of torque, mated solely to a six-speed automatic transmission. The engine also has an overboost function that will increase torque to 280 lb-ft for up to ten seconds. The full brace of official specs haven't been released, but GM tells us that highway fuel economy will come in at 42 miles per gallon. If that number sounds familiar, it's because the Volkswagen Jetta TDI has the exact same rating. Unlike the Jetta, however, the Cruze TD can run on B20 biodiesel, where as the Volkswagen can only accept B5.
Model-specific changes to this 2014 Cruze TD include an aero kit and unique 17-inch alloy wheels. Inside, there's a full leather interior, and Chevrolet will provide two years of complimentary scheduled maintenance, not to mention a 100,000-mile powertrain warranty.
Chevy says not to look at the 2019 Silverado's fuel economy rating
Tue, Nov 20 2018The 2019 Chevy Silverado is hitting dealerships soon, and one of the most notable changes for the new full-size pickup is the addition of a 2.7-liter turbocharged inline-four. The engine replaces the naturally-aspirated 4.3-liter V6 in volume consumer models like the Silverado LT and promises more power, less weight and — most importantly — better fuel economy. The thing is, the gains in efficiency haven't been as dramatic as some might have hoped, especially when stacked up against competitors from Ford and Ram. As Automotive News reports, GM's response is a little murky. First, let's talk numbers. We're pulling all figures from FuelEconomy.gov, the official U.S. government source for fuel ratings. Fuel economy numbers on trucks vary greatly based on a number of factors. Bed and cab configuration play a part, but so does a four-wheel-drive system. You also have to factor in tires, transmissions, rear-axle gearing, hybrid systems and cylinder deactivation. Things like that can make the difference between best- and worst-in-class. The EPA's website doesn't give enough information a lot of the time, so there's really no easy way to compare apples-to-apples. First, take a look at the ratings for the 2019 Silverado. A 2.7-liter model with two-wheel drive is rated 20 city, 23 highway and 21 combined. That's both better and worse than a two-wheel drive 2018 Silverado with the 4.3-liter V6 (18 city, 24 highway and 20 combined). The updated 2019 Silverado with a 4.3-liter V6 has yet to be rated. With less weight and a smaller engine, many hoped Chevy would make bigger gains. It's unusual to see any decrease in a fuel economy metric these days. GM says that it's not done tuning the new 2.7-liter engine, so fuel economy could theoretically increase. Expanding further, a V8-powered 2019 Silverado (17 city, 24 highway and 19 combined) actually gets better highway fuel economy than a turbocharged four-cylinder powered truck in certain configurations, even if the latter has a better overall average. But that's only with two-wheel drive, the 8-speed transmission and cylinder deactivation. A Silverado with the 5.3-liter V8 and a 6-speed automatic is rated at 15 city, 22 highway and 17 combined. The biggest issue with the Silverado 2.7-liter doesn't come from within GM itself but from Ford and Ram. GM cites the Ford F-150 with the 3.3-liter V6 and the Ram 1500 with the 3.6-liter V6 as the closest competitors to its new 2.7-liter inline-four.
Our favorite mid-engine Corvette theories and rumors
Tue, Sep 13 2016The mid-engine Corvette! We just saw blurry photos through the foliage, and are hearts are all aflutter because it means that this car is real. And it's the most " never before" Corvette since 1984. Which leads us to all kinds of wacky theories and speculation. Everybody knows something or heard from a guy. None of those guys (or gals) from GM are talking to Autoblog, to be clear. But that won't stop us from stirring the pot. Let's go over a few point-by-point. The pushrod engine will be replaced by an overhead-cam V8 Car and Driver has repeatedly reported that an overhead-cam engine will come after the mid-engine Corvette's debut with an old-school pushrod. We've heard the same thing firsthand, albeit from a source with no connection to the development of the Corvette or powertrain. "At some point two valves can't pass future emissions regulations," said the guy we know. While the pushrod engine is compact, the design makes it difficult - if not impossible - for sophisticated variable valve timing (and lift) systems that control combustion with more precision. Hasty conclusion: The pushrod engine has a finite life in front of it. This one's a lock, it's a just a matter of when. Bowling Green's new paint shop is really the mid-engine assembly line Credit to Reddit for this one. Like we said, everybody knows a guy. But let's look deeper. The new paint facility costs $439 million dollars and adds 450,000 square feet, almost half the size of the existing plant. Plus GM announced another $290 million in upgrades at Bowling Green Assembly. That sure sounds like a lot of money, but you can actually spend that much on a paint booth. Porsche spent 500 million Euros (about $561 million dollars) to add the Macan assembly to its Leipzig, Germany plant in 2014. Chrysler shelled out $850 million for a paint shop in Sterling Heights, Michigan. GM spent $600 million for a new paint shop at the Fairfax (Kansas City) plant. Honda, on the other hand, is working on a thrifty $210 million project in Marysville, Ohio that includes a 300,000 square foot expansion, and the low-volume Acura NSX facility only cost $70 million. Hasty conclusion: The square footage and cost could easily mean a new assembly line instead of (or in addition to) a paint line. And if the NSX plant was really that cheap, GM could have hidden a similar sum in its existing announcements.