2002 Chevrolet Camaro Ss 35th Anniversary Edition Only 9201 Mi Showroom Cond!! on 2040-cars
Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States
Body Type:Coupe
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:5.7L 350Cu. In. V8 GAS OHV Naturally Aspirated
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Make: Chevrolet
Model: Camaro
Trim: Z28 SS Coupe 2-Door 35th Anniversary Edition
Options: T Tops
Safety Features: Driver Airbag
Drive Type: 2 wheel rear
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows, Power Seats
Mileage: 9,201
Sub Model: SS 35th Anniversary Edition with T Tops
Exterior Color: Red
Disability Equipped: No
Interior Color: Black
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Number of Cylinders: 8
I am selling my 2002 Chevrolet Camaro SS 35th Anniversary Edition which only has 9201 miles on it and it is in showroom condition. According to SLP Engineering who worked with Chevrolet to build these cars. Mine is build number 3851. The car is completely stock with no modifications whatsoever except for the rear deck mat that shows the 35th Anniversary Emblem and Car Cover.
The condition of the exterior of the car is outstanding. There are NO scratches, nicks, road rash on the rims, or anywhere on the car. The interior is perfect , even the bolster on the drivers seat has no wear.
If you are looking for a showroom condition car this is one you should look at.
Thanks
Scott
651-303-8313
Chevrolet Camaro for Sale
- 1968 chevrolet camaro rs/ss 396/325hp
- 2011 chevrolet camaro 2ss coupe(US $32,500.00)
- Supercharged 1990 camaro
- 1997 chevy camaro z28 30th anniversary special edition(US $12,000.00)
- 1996 chevrolet camaro rs coupe 2-door 3.8l(US $4,000.00)
- 1982 chevrolet camaro base coupe 2-door 2.5l(US $3,000.00)
Auto Services in Minnesota
Suburban Chevrolet ★★★★★
Steve`s Collision Inc ★★★★★
Premier Auto Glass ★★★★★
Precision Tune Auto Care ★★★★★
Phils Quality Automotive ★★★★★
Nordic Auto Glass LLC ★★★★★
Auto blog
800k car names trademarked globally, suddenly alphanumerics seem reasonable
Tue, 01 Oct 2013What's in a name? This cliched phrase probably gets tossed out at every marketing meeting that happens when a new car gets its nomenclature. We know the answer, though: everything. The name of a car has all the potential to make or break it with fickle customers that are more conscious than ever about what their purchases say about them.
That's giving headaches to marketing folks across the automotive industry. "It's tough. In 1985 there were about 75,000 names trademarked in the automotive space. Today there are 800,000," Chevrolet's head of marketing, Russ Clark, told Automotive News. Infiniti's president, Johan de Nysschen, echoed Clark's sentiment, saying, "The truth of the matter is, across the world, there is hardly a name or a letter that hasn't already been claimed by one car manufacturer or another. You can go through the alphabet - A, B, C and so forth - and you will quickly see that almost all available letters are taken."
What has that left automakers to do? Get creative. In the case of Infiniti, it made the controversial move to bring all of its cars' names into a new scheme, classifying them as Q#0 for cars and QX#0 for SUVs and crossovers. So the Infiniti G, which was available as the G25 and G37, is now the Q50. The FX37 and FX50 are now the QX70.
Dodge vs. Chevy tug-of-war taken to the extreme
Mon, 17 Dec 2012They say "idle hands are the devil's playground," but said playgrounds grow to Disney-sized proportions when a pair of jacked-up trucks, two egos, a chain and an empty mall parking lot are involved. Proof of this is the video below, which shows a Cummins-powered Dodge Ram circa 2006 to 2008 chained tail-to-tail with what looks to be a gasoline-powered Chevrolet Silverado from the late 1990s or early 2000s.
We don't necessarily have to tell you who wins this battle, but we'll let you see for yourself the lengths the "winning" driver goes to prove his point. There's plenty of foul language in the video below, so beware that this might be Not Safe For Work, and not that we should have to tell you, but please, do not try this at home.
Consumer Reports criticizes small turbo engines for misleading performance, fuel economy claims [w/video]
Tue, 05 Feb 2013Consumer Reports has taken aim at at small-displacement, forced-induction engines, saying the powerplants don't manage to deliver on automaker fuel economy claims. Manufacturers have long held that smaller, turbocharged engines pack all power of their larger displacement cousins with significantly better fuel economy, but the research organization says that despite scoring high EPA economy numbers, the engines are no better than conventional drivetrains in both categories. Jake Fisher, director of automotive testing for Consumer Reports, says the forced induction options "are often slower and less fuel efficient than larger four and six-cylinder engines."
Specifically, CR calls out the new Ford Fusion equipped with the automaker's Ecoboost 1.6-liter four-cylinder engine. The institute's researchers found the engine, which is a $795 option over the base 2.5-liter four-cylinder, fails to match competitors in acceleration and served up 25 miles per gallon in testing, putting the sedan dead last among other midsize options.
The Chevrolet Cruze, Hyundai Sonata Turbo and Ford Escape 2.0T all got dinged for the same troubles, though Consumer Reports has found the turbo 2.0-liter four-cylinder in the BMW 328i does deliver on its promises. You can check out the full press release below. You can also read the full study on the Consumer Reports site, or scroll down for a short video recap.