Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1982 Chopped Chevy C10 on 2040-cars

Year:1982 Mileage:500 Color: Blue Magenta Metallic /
 Gray and Black
Location:

Nashua, New Hampshire, United States

Nashua, New Hampshire, United States
Advertising:
Body Type:Pickup Truck
Engine:383 Stroker
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
VIN: 2gccc14h4c1100914 Year: 1982
Exterior Color: Blue Magenta Metallic
Make: Chevrolet
Interior Color: Gray and Black
Model: C-10
Number of Cylinders: 8
Trim: 2 Doors
Drive Type: RWD
Mileage: 500
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

This is a 1982 Custom Chevy Silverado, This was a full frame off restoration..The frame was sandblasted and

painted with por15, Cab has been chopped 7 inches as well as the doors. There is a 383 stroker with about 500

miles on it 350trans with stall converter, side pipes and shift kit,Brand new interior, Dash with Billit aluminum inserts,

Leather bucket seats with center console and new rug, Fuel cell in the bed.. This truck is about 99% done.

Needs tailgate to be finished(have a brand new tailgate with filler), needs glass for passanger and driver

side.

Lots of extras, Dakota Digital Dash, remote door handles, power tailgate, new steal roll pan all in boxes, not installed yet.

Paint color and numbers. One of kind truck

Auto Services in New Hampshire

Signature Motor Cars ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers, Wholesale Used Car Dealers
Address: 230 Boston St, Salem
Phone: (978) 887-3200

Salvadore Autobody ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 431 W Broadway, Rindge
Phone: (978) 630-2300

RK Auto Repair, LLC ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Transmission, Automobile Air Conditioning Equipment-Service & Repair
Address: 7 Congress St, Nashua
Phone: (603) 595-7575

Quirk Buick GMC ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: 1250 South Willow St, Auburn
Phone: (603) 263-4407

Newport Tire & Auto ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Tire Dealers, Mufflers & Exhaust Systems
Address: 20 Sunapee St, Newport
Phone: (603) 863-7002

Majestic Motors ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Salvage, Used & Rebuilt Auto Parts
Address: 734 Daniel Webster Hwy Ste R,# R, Mont-Vernon
Phone: (603) 261-2025

Auto blog

GM recalls 638,000 U.S. SUVs, trucks for unintended braking

Sat, Nov 2 2019

WASHINGTON — General Motors is recalling 638,000 U.S. sport utility vehicles and pickup trucks because a wheel-speed sensor could fail and cause unintended braking, it said Thursday. The recall covers 2015-2020 Chevrolet Suburban, Tahoe, and Yukon and 2014-2018 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 and GMC Sierra 1500 vehicles equipped with a 5.3-liter engine, a 3.08-ratio rear axle and four-wheel drive. The sensor failure could result in unintended activation of the driveline protection system, and cause unintended braking of the wheel on the opposite side of the failed sensor. That could cause the vehicle to pull to one side unexpectedly, increasing the risk of a crash, the Detroit automaker said. GM said it was not aware of any crashes relating to the issue but found 150 field claims alleging the condition caused unintended braking or lateral vehicle motion. A GM dealer in May submitted a warranty report relating to the issue in a 2018 GMC Yukon, and two days later, a GM brand quality manager submitted the report to GMÂ’s Speak Up For Safety program that tracks potential safety issues, which prompted a GM investigation and testing. Recalls Chevrolet GM GMC Truck SUV

Since 2010, Chevy Volt has outsold Nissan Leaf by just two units

Tue, Mar 3 2015

The first two plug-in vehicles from major automakers in the US were the Chevy Volt and the Nissan Leaf. Ever since they went on sale to much fanfare in late 2010, we've been tracking the monthly sales with great interest (and, of course, other green vehicle sales as well). After a big initial lead by the Volt – the Volt outsold the Leaf 23,461 to 9,819 in 2012 – the Leaf has been chugging along and outsold the Volt every month since November 2013. We knew that the cumulative totals would soon tip in favor of the Leaf, but for at least one more month, the Volt is going to be able to say its the most popular plug-in vehicle in the US. Overall, for all officially reported sales of the Leaf and the Volt, things are almost exactly tied. Since the vehicles went on sale in the end of 2010 until the end of February 2015, the Volt has sold 74,592 units and the Leaf has sold ... drumroll please ... 74,590 units. For February, Leaf sales totaled 1,198 units, a 17-percent drop from the 1,425 Leafs sold last February. Brendan Jones, Nissan's director of Electric Vehicle Sales and Infrastructure, said in a statement that, "Tough winter weather in several key markets held EV sales back in February. As we head into spring, we look forward to seeing more dealership traffic so shoppers can experience firsthand the benefits of the all-electric Nissan Leaf." Of course, it was cold in the US last February, too, but we're sure that the nasty weather did indeed play a role last month. Things were even worse for the Chevy Volt, which dropped to just 693 copies sold, down 47 percent from the 1,210 sold last year. That's just barely enough for Chevy to keep talking about its plug-in sales leadership, but we expect the message to change once the March numbers come out next month. Related Video:

What if the mid-engine Corvette is really a Cadillac?

Tue, Jun 28 2016

Call me crazy, but I'm not convinced the mid-engine Corvette is the next Corvette. The rumor is strong, yes. And, contrary to some of the comments on our site, Car and Driver - leader of the mid-engine Corvette speculation brigade - has a pretty good record predicting future models. But it's another comment that got me thinking: or maybe it's a Cadillac. There is clearly something mid-engine going on at GM, and I think it makes sense for the car to be a Cadillac. First off, check out how sweet the 2002 Cadillac Cien concept car still looks in the photo above. Second, there are too many holes in the mid-engine Corvette theory. There are too many holes in the mid-engine Corvette theory. The C7 is relatively young in Corvette years, starting production almost three years ago as a 2014 model. Showing a 2019 model at the 2018 North American International Auto Show would kill sales of a strong-selling car before its time. Not to mention it would only mean a short run for the Grand Sport, which was the best-selling version of the previous generation. More stuff doesn't add up. Mid-engine cars are, in general, more expensive. Moving the Vette upmarket leaves a void that the Camaro does not fill. There's not much overlap between Camaro and Corvette customers. Corvette owners are older and enjoy features like a big trunk that holds golf clubs. Mid-engine means less trunk space and alienating a happy, loyal buyer. Also, more than 60 years of history. The Corvette is an icon along the likes of the Porsche 911 and Ford Mustang. I'm not sure the car-buying public wants a Corvette that abandons all previous conventions. And big changes bring uncertainty - I don't think GM would make such a risky bet. Chevrolet could build a mid-engine ZR1, you might say, and keep the other Corvettes front-engine. Yes they could, and it would cost a ton of money. And they still need to fund development of that front-engine car. I highly doubt the corporate accountants would go for that. But a Cadillac? Totally. Cadillac is in the middle of a brand repositioning. GM is throwing money at this effort. A mid-engine halo car is the just the splash the brand needs to shake off the ghosts of Fleetwoods past. And it's already in Cadillac President Johan De Nysschen's playbook. He was in charge of Audi's North America arm when the R8 came out. A Caddy sports car priced above $100,000 isn't that unreasonable when you can already price a CTS-V in that range.