1982 Buick Riviera Limited Edition Convertible 2-door 4.1l on 2040-cars
Orrington, Maine, United States
|
HERE IS A 1982 BUICK RIVIERA CONVERTABLE. THE FIRST YEAR OF RIVIERA CONVERTABLES. ONLY 1248 PRODUCED. ONE OF ONLY 106 EQUIPTED WITH 4.1 V6 4 BBL.PRICE WITH STANDARD OPTIONS. {EVERYTHING WAS STANDARD } CAR HAS ONLY 101,056 MILES, BELIEVED TO BE ORIGNAL. PAINT, BODY, CHROME AND BUMPERS ARE PRESTINE.NEW FRONT AND BACK BUMPER FILLERS. NEW { 3 WEEKS ] ALL CUSTOM MADE FROM ORIGNAL PATTERNS, FRONT ANDBACK SEAT COVERS, HEAD RESTS ARM REST. FLOOR AND TRUNK CARPET LIKE NEW. THIS CAR HAS NEVER SEEN SNOW, PURCHASED FROM STATE OF WASHINGTON. NO RUST ANYWHERE.RUNS GOOD NO SMOKE, CARB COULD NEEDSADJ. HAS A FLAT SPOT ON AXCELLERATION .TOP IN GREAT CONDTION, GOES UP AND DOWN WELL. GOOD BOOT. HUBCAPS LOOK NEW BECAUSE THEY ARE. PUSCHASED NOS ON EBAY IN ORIGNAL BOXS. NEVER BEEN ON A CAR. INVOICE FOR $520.98 ORIGNAL COST. HAS A CLEAN FLORIDA TITLE . ANT STOPPED GOIND DOWN. RIGHT REAR WINDOW NEEDS HELP UP AND DOWN , BUT DOES. THIS BEAUTY IS AN EXCELLENT THAT COULD WIN AWARDS FOR CONDITION AND RARITY. RIVIERA OWNERS ASSOC. HAS ONLY 110 REGISTERED OF 1248. NOT MANY OUT THERE. RESERVE IS A FAIR PRICE FOR THIS GREAT RIVA.WILL PAY HALF OF SHIPPING COST UP TO $ 500.00 ONLY.DON'T LET THIS GET AWAY. GOOD LUCK BIDDING !!!! SOLD AS IS WHERE IS.
|
Buick Riviera for Sale
1985 buick riviera 2-door 5.0l(US $5,500.00)
1985 buick riviera luxury coupe 2-door 5.0l(US $3,100.00)
1969 buick riviera base hardtop 2-door 7.0l(US $18,002.00)
Classic 1992 blue riviera with 85 k miles.diamond white low reserve
1978 buick rivera classic no reserve
1983 buick rivera convertible(US $11,000.00)
Auto Services in Maine
The Shop Inc. ★★★★★
Patriot Subaru ★★★★★
Northeast Window Tinting ★★★★★
Michigan Driveline Products ★★★★★
Larson`s Auto Repair ★★★★★
Emerson Toyota ★★★★★
Auto blog
GM puts e-commerce shopping in car dashboards
Tue, Dec 5 2017DETROIT — General Motors on Tuesday said it will equip newer cars with in-dash e-commerce technology, betting it can profit as drivers order food, find fuel or reserve hotel rooms by tapping icons on the dashboard screen, instead of using smartphones while driving. GM's Marketplace technology, developed with IBM, will be uploaded automatically to about 1.9 million model-year 2017 and later vehicles starting immediately, with about 4 million vehicles across the Chevrolet, Buick, GMC and Cadillac brands equipped with the capability in the United States by the end of 2018, GM said. GM will get an undisclosed amount of revenue from merchants featured on its in-dash Marketplace, Santiago Chamorro, GM vice president for global connected customer experience, said during a briefing for reporters. Customers will not be charged for using the service or the data transmitted to and from the car while making transactions, he said. "This platform is financed by the merchants," Chamorro said. GM will get paid for placing a merchant's application on its screens, and "there's some level of revenue sharing" based on each transaction, he said. It is too soon to say how much revenue GM could realize from the Marketplace system, he said. The GM Marketplace will compete for customer clicks and revenue with hand-held smartphones, which offer a far richer array of applications than the GM system will at the outset. Amazon.com is partnering with other automakers, including Ford, to offer in-car e-commerce capability through Amazon's Alexa personal assistant system. For example, GM will launch Marketplace with just Shell and Exxon Mobil icons in the fuel category. The only restaurant available for in-car table reservations at launch is the chain TGI Fridays, GM said. In addition, there will be apps for parking, and ordering ahead at coffee shops and restaurants such as Starbucks, Dunkin' Donuts and Applebee's. "We will be adding more vendors," with some coming in the first quarter of 2018, Chamorro said. In addition, he said GM plans to expand integration into its vehicles of music, news and other information services. GM also hopes to use its in-car Marketplace connections to expand purchases of products and services, such as additional access to in-car wifi, from its own replacement parts business and dealer network. Customers can "expect to see more service promotions coming through the platform," Chamorro said. Reporting by Joe WhiteRelated Video:
Lexus tops JD Power Vehicle Dependability Study again, Buick bests Toyota
Wed, Feb 25 2015It shouldn't surprise anyone, but Lexus has once again taken the top spot in JD Power's Vehicle Dependability Study. That'd be the Japanese luxury brand's fourth straight year at the top of table. The big news, though, is the rise of Buick. General Motor's near-premium brand beat out Toyota to take second place, with 110 problems per 100 vehicles compared to Toyota's 111 problems. Lexus owners only reported 89 problems per 100 vehicles. Besides Buick's three-position jump, Scion enjoyed a major improvement, jumping 13 positions from 2014. Ram and Mitsubishi made big gains, as well, moving up 11 and 10 positions, respectively. In terms of individual segments, GM and Toyota both excelled, taking home seven segment awards each. The study wasn't good news for all involved, though. A number of popular automakers finished below the industry average of 147 problems per 100 vehicles, including Subaru, (157PP100), Volkswagen (165PP100), Ford/Hyundai (188PP100 each) and Mini (193PP100). The biggest losers (by a tremendous margin, we might add) were Land Rover and Fiat, recording 258 and 273 problems per 100 vehicles. The next closest brand was Jeep, with 197PP100. While the Vehicle Dependability Study uses the same measurement system as the Initial Quality Survey, the two metrics analyze very different things. The VDS looks at problems experienced by original owners of model year 2012 vehicles over the past 12 months, while the oft-quoted IQS focuses on problems in the first 90 days of new-vehicle ownership. Like the IQS, though, the VDS has a rather broad definition of what a problem is. Because of that, a low score from JD Power is no guarantee of extreme unreliability, so much as just poor design. In this most recent study, the two most reported problems focused on Bluetooth connectivity and the voice-command systems. The former leaves plenty of room for user error due to poor design (particularly true of the Bluetooth systems on the low-scoring Fords, Volkswagens and Subarus), while the second is something JD Power has already confirmed as being universally terrible. That makes means that while these studies are important, they shouldn't be taken as gospel when it comes to automotive reliability. News Source: JD PowerImage Credit: Copyright 2015 Jeremy Korzeniewski / AOL Buick Fiat Ford GM Hyundai Jeep Land Rover Lexus MINI Mitsubishi RAM Scion Subaru Toyota Volkswagen Auto Repair Ownership study
Hyundai tops VW and Buick in China, survey says
Wed, Apr 15 2015You may be aware of the long-time competition in China between Volkswagen and Buick, but another brand apparently should be in that conversation too: Hyundai. In a recently published annual consumer survey, the Korean company actually took the top spot to beat out its German and American rivals in second and third, respectively. The results were part of the China Brand Power Index that interviewed 11,500 people around the nation and was paid for by the country's Ministry of Industry and Information Technology. While Hyundai proved popular with voters, its sales haven't necessarily shown that yet. According to Bloomberg, the brand had falling numbers in China for the first quarter of the year. Even Ford outsold the South Korean automaker in the same period, despite scoring lower on the survey. Meanwhile, Audi ranked as the populace's favorite luxury brand, which is hardly a surprise given the Four Rings' strong sales in China. In January alone the automaker saw a 15-percent boost in volume there. Parent company VW's strong performance was somewhat more surprising, though. State media severely criticized the German automaker in March, and customers protested last year for the allegedly poor handling of a recall.























