2008 X5 3.0si Used 3l I6 24v Automatic Awd Suv Premium on 2040-cars
Beaverton, Oregon, United States
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:3.0L 2996CC l6 GAS DOHC Naturally Aspirated
For Sale By:Dealer
Body Type:Sport Utility
Fuel Type:GAS
Interior Color: Black
Make: BMW
Model: X5
Warranty: No
Trim: 3.0si Sport Utility 4-Door
Drive Type: AWD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 60,578
Sub Model: 3.0si
Number of Cylinders: 6
Exterior Color: Black
BMW X5 for Sale
11 alpine white xdrive-35d 3l i6 awd diesel suv *premium & technology pkg *fl
2007 bmw x5 3.0si sport utility 4-door 3.0l(US $20,645.00)
2001 bmw x5 4.4i sport utility 4-door black with black leather with navigation
2012 bmw x5m black/black fully loaded!!(US $70,000.00)
2008 bmw x5 3.0si rare options..brown leather..3rd row seat..factory tv..keyless
Black 4.8l sport package heated seats navigation 20 inch wheels every option(US $25,977.00)
Auto Services in Oregon
Tire Factory Of Mc Minnville ★★★★★
Speed`s Auto Service ★★★★★
Sonny`s Auto Service ★★★★★
Roberson Chrysler Jeep ★★★★★
Rabe`s Auto Upholstery ★★★★★
Pro Auto Wholesale ★★★★★
Auto blog
BMW M2 claims 7:58 'Ring time in video
Thu, Oct 15 2015BMW really, really wants us to believe the new M2 is a return to form for the high-performance sub-brand. In its initial release on the car, it drew a strong, explicit link to not only the 1 Series M Coupe – easily its most direct ancestor – but also to the original E30 M3, which is basically the M2's granddaddy. Further underscoring this link, BMW has paired the M2 with the 1M Coupe and ur-M3 for a new video where it reveals that the newest M car will lap the Nurburgring Nordschleife in just 7:58. While that isn't as fast as the M4 – we're betting that vehicle's fan base just let out a huge sigh of relief – it's quicker than the E92 M3, which is certainly something worth boasting about. Check out the video up top to see the new M2 dice with its predecessors, and then head back and check out our original post on the newest M car.
Is BMW the only real competition to Tesla Motors?
Sat, Mar 1 2014Tesla Motors chief Elon Musk probably isn't losing a ton of sleep over the new plug-in efforts by the makers of the "Ultimate Driving Machine," but maybe he should. That's what the Motley Fool is saying, presenting the case that the California company's real competition will come from BMW. What about the plug-in efforts of General Motors or Ford? Musk can hit the snooze, Motley Fool says. Unlike automakers that are "jamming battery packs into the existing vehicle design," BMW has built its i3 battery-electric and i8 plug-in hybrid supercar from the ground up. Like Tesla, BMW puts its battery packs into the floor of its vehicles. Most importantly, the i3 - and especially the i8 - are real performers. While the i8 is about 40-percent more expensive than the Tesla, it matches the Model S's 0-60 mile per hour acceleration times and handily beats its top speed figures. Tesla sold about 6,900 vehicles during the last three months of 2013 and BMW had more than 10,000 i3 orders on the books by late November and the first year's allotment of i8s is already sold out. The German automaker has what the Fool calls an "outside chance" of selling more plug-in vehicles than Tesla by next year, but Tesla is gearing up its gigafactory to get ready to sell a half-million EVs in 2020, so the race is most certainly on. You can read more over on the Fool.
2015 BMW M3 Sedan
Tue, 20 May 2014BMW's all-new M3 Sedan is dynamically nearly identical to its two-door M4 Coupe sibling: a stopwatch reveals that both are sub-four-second cars to 60 miles per hour, a racetrack proves that the mechanical twins are equally as adept on a road course and a full afternoon of driving on public roads demonstrates that each possesses talented everyday adaptability.
Yet after driving both BMW models back-to-back over two full days in Portugal, it's clear there are a few noticeable differences, both objective and subjective, that don't require instrument testing to reveal. All it takes is a few hours behind the wheel of both cars to conclude that one is slightly more agile, and the other a bit more twitchy. One has better outward visibility, while its counterpart is unquestionably more convenient.
It is the little things - subtleties attained through seat-of-the-pants observations - that eventually allow me to choose a favorite.