Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2009 Bmw 535i Twin-turbo Auto Sport Sunroof Nav 70k Mi Texas Direct Auto on 2040-cars

US $23,780.00
Year:2009 Mileage:70894 Color: Mirrors
Location:

Stafford, Texas, United States

Stafford, Texas, United States
Advertising:

Auto Services in Texas

Zeke`s Inspections Plus ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Battery Storage, Battery Supplies
Address: 1006 S Frazier St, Hufsmith
Phone: (936) 441-3500

Value Import ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers
Address: 1210 N Wayside Dr, Winchester
Phone: (866) 595-6470

USA Car Care ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Body Parts
Address: 202 Cypresswood Dr, Klein
Phone: (281) 355-5800

USA Auto ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 12113 Garland Rd, Rowlett
Phone: (972) 247-4098

Uresti Jesse Camper Sales ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Truck Accessories, Transport Trailers
Address: 13070 Interstate 35 S, Atascosa
Phone: (210) 623-2411

Universal Village Auto Inc ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Wholesale Used Car Dealers
Address: 6223 Richmond Ave, West-University-Place
Phone: (832) 320-9600

Auto blog

BMW M3 takes on Mercedes-AMG C63 S in track battle from Evo

Sun, Jun 21 2015

Over the last few decades, BMW has firmly established an enviable reputation among automotive enthusiasts by making what many consider to be the very best sporty sedans and coupes in the world. Every few years, a new challenger appears from one of the German brand's long list of competitors, but the result always seems to be the same: Close, but no cigar. The latest challenger to BMW's on-track crown comes from Mercedes-AMG in the form of the C63 S sedan. The AMG has a lot more power, an excellent and balanced chassis and it looks beautiful. But is it good enough to outperform the latest BMW M3? We're not going to spoil it for you. Watch the latest Deadly Rivals video from Evo to find out which competitor comes out on top.

AC Schnitzer's hotrod BMW 318ti remembered by MotorWeek

Thu, Apr 7 2016

There are plenty of compact luxury cars available in the US today, including the Audi A3, BMW 2 Series, and Mercedes-Benz CLA-Class. In the '90s, the BMW 318ti tried to offer a similar mix of luxury at a reasonable price, but it never quite found much success in America. The 318ti looked like an E36-generation 3 Series in front but featured a stumpy liftback at the rear. The only engine available in the US was a four-cylinder. If you had the money, though, the aftermarket was ready to give you more power and more aggressive looks. AC Schnitzer dropped a bored and stroked 3.0-liter inline-six under the hood to create a pocket-sized hot rod, and MotorWeek took it for a drive. The model in this video was the promo car for AC Schnitzer's US importer, and it had every upgrade possible to show off what the German tuner's produced. Under the hood, the company installed an upgraded engine with 241 horsepower and 228 pound-feet of torque. For comparison, a US-spec M3 of the era had 240 horsepower and either 225 or 236 lb-ft, depending on the model year. AC Schnitzer also sharpened the 318ti with a suspension overhaul and short shifter. According to MotorWeek's tests, the mods got the hatchback to 60 miles per hour in 6 seconds and gave 318ti laudable handling. So much performance wasn't cheap, though. The upgrades on the promo car cost more than twice as much as the 318ti's base price. Watch this Retro Review to find out the massive amount you needed to pay to get M3 performance in a tiny package. Related Video:

2015 BMW M3 Sedan

Tue, 20 May 2014

BMW's all-new M3 Sedan is dynamically nearly identical to its two-door M4 Coupe sibling: a stopwatch reveals that both are sub-four-second cars to 60 miles per hour, a racetrack proves that the mechanical twins are equally as adept on a road course and a full afternoon of driving on public roads demonstrates that each possesses talented everyday adaptability.
Yet after driving both BMW models back-to-back over two full days in Portugal, it's clear there are a few noticeable differences, both objective and subjective, that don't require instrument testing to reveal. All it takes is a few hours behind the wheel of both cars to conclude that one is slightly more agile, and the other a bit more twitchy. One has better outward visibility, while its counterpart is unquestionably more convenient.
It is the little things - subtleties attained through seat-of-the-pants observations - that eventually allow me to choose a favorite.