2006 Acura Rsx on 2040-cars
3512 Spring Garden St, Greensboro, North Carolina, United States
Engine:2.0L I4 16V MPFI DOHC
Transmission:5-Speed Automatic
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): JH4DC54896S015386
Stock Num: 226470756
Make: Acura
Model: RSX
Year: 2006
Exterior Color: Black
Interior Color: Black
Options: Drive Type: FWD
Number of Doors: 2 Doors
Mileage: 151351
Leather, CD Player, Remote power door locks, Power mirrors, Heated mirrors, 1 one-touch power windows, Cruise control, Front console with storage, Front and rear cupholders, Front door pockets, Manual rear seat easy entry, Remote trunk release, Front seatback storage, Speed-proportional power steering, 12V front and 12V rear power outlet(s), Tilt-adjustable steering wheel, Cruise controls on steering wheel, Interior air filtration, Climate control, Cargo area light, Front reading lights, Leather steering wheel, Front and rear floor mats, Dual vanity mirrors, Variable intermittent wipers, Rear defogger, Intermittent rear wiper, Power glass sunroof, 4-wheel ABS, Dual front side-mounted airbags, Child seat anchors, Remote anti-theft alarm system, Ventilated front disc / solid rear disc brakes, Engine immobilizer, 2 front headrests, 2 rear headrests, Passenger airbag occupant sensing deactivation, Front seatbelt pretensioners, Electronic brakeforce distribution, Front integrated headrests, Rear integrated headrests, BASE ENGINE SIZE 2.0 L, CAM TYPE Double overhead cam (DOHC), CYLINDERS Inline 4, VALVES 16, VALVE TIMING Variable,TORQUE 139 ft-lbs. @ 4000 rpm, HORSEPOWER 155 hp @ 6500 rpm,TURNING CIRCLE 38.1 ft. FUEL TANK CAPACITY 13.2 gal. RANGE IN MILES (CTY/HWY) 290.4/409.2 mi. EPA MILEAGE EST. (CTY/HWY) 22/31 mpg. warranties are available for all cars. just call us or come visit our second location at 2806 Patterson st.
Acura RSX for Sale
2002 acura rsx type s(US $6,399.00)
2006 acura rsx(US $9,813.00)
2005 acura rsx(US $4,913.00)
2002 acura rsx type s(US $7,499.00)
2002 acura rsx(US $4,995.00)
2003 acura rsx type s(US $5,700.00)
Auto Services in North Carolina
Xtreme Detail ★★★★★
Winston Road Automotive ★★★★★
Whites Tire Svc ★★★★★
Whites Tire Svc ★★★★★
Westgate Imports ★★★★★
West Jefferson Chevrolet ★★★★★
Auto blog
NSX, S660, and a 4-motor CR-Z EV that goes like hell
Tue, Oct 27 2015AutoblogGreen Editor-in-Chief Sebastian Blanco was my road dog while visiting Honda's R&D center in Tochigi. Over the course of a long day of briefings, driving demonstrations, and a variety of strange-flavored candies, we saw quite a lot of what the company is planning for the next generation and beyond. Of course, Sebastian and I see the world through very different eyes. So, while he was busy getting details about the FCV Clarity successor, and asking tough questions about electrification (in other words, the important stuff), I was fixating on a tiny, two-seat sports car that will never come to America. Oh, there was an NSX, too. Honda's pre-Tokyo Motor Show meeting really did have plenty to offer for all kinds of auto enthusiasts, be they focused on fast driving or environmentally friendly powertrains. Seb's attendance let me focus on the stuff that's great for the former, while he wrote up high points of the latter. View 15 Photos S660 I joke about salivating over the S660, but honestly I was at least as excited to take a few laps in Honda's Beat encore, as I was to sample the Acura supercar. Conditions for the test drive weren't ideal, however. Two laps of a four-kilometer banked oval is not exactly nirvana for a 1,800-pound, 63-horsepower roadster. Still, I folded all six feet and five inches of my body behind the tiny wheel determined to wring it out. The immersion of the driving experience was enough to make it feel fast, at least. I shifted up just before redline in first gear with the last quarter of the pit lane rollout lane still in front of me. The 658cc inline-three buzzed like a mad thing behind my ear, vastly more stirring than you'd expect while traveling about 30 miles per hour. The S660 is limited to just around 87 mph, but the immersion of the driving experience (note: I was over the windscreen from the forehead up) was enough to make it feel fast, at least. Even after just a few laps, and precious little steering, I could tell that everything I grew up loving about Honda was in play here. The six-speed manual offered tight, quick throws, the engine seemed happiest over 5,000 rpm, and the car moved over the earth with direct action and a feeling of lightness. Sure proof that you don't need high performance – the S600 runs to 60 mph in about 13 seconds – to build a driver's car. I could have used 200 miles more, and some mountain roads, to really enjoy the roadster (though I would have wanted a hat).
A look inside Honda’s “Safety For Everyone” research and development operation
Sat, Aug 24 2019RAYMOND, Ohio—As part of its long-running “Safety for Everyone” campaign, Honda has established the audacious goal of what it calls a “zero-collision society.” But rather than making big claims about developing a fully-autonomous vehicle, which Honda hasnÂ’t done, the company is trying to chip away at the more than 37,000 vehicle-related fatalities that occurred in the U.S. in 2017 with a multi-pronged approach. Here in central Ohio, engineers are working with state-of-the-art facilities and equipment to boost active safety systems like its HondaSensing suite of safety technology with old fashioned passive systems like structural steel frames or new airbag designs that protect passengers in a crash. Honda provided members of the press with a rare tour inside its Honda R&D Americas headquarters this week. Honda officials say that increasingly, safety — and specifically, third-party ratings from the likes of the National Highway Safety Traffic Administration and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety — figure into the top three factors consumers weigh when purchasing a vehicle. Honda and Acura have 10, 2019 models that have earned IIHSÂ’s Top Safety Pick or Top Safety Pick+ ratings, and all 15, 2019 model-year Honda and Acura vehicles that have undergone NHTSA crash testing have earned a 5-star overall rating. And Honda prides itself on its growing list of safety firsts, including the first upward-deploying front passenger airbag, in 1990 in the Acura Legend; first omni-directional crash-test facility, in 2000; and the first autonomous braking system, in the 2006 Acura RL. It hopes its new three-chamber airbag goes industry-wide and joins that list. “ItÂ’s part of our companyÂ’s culture,” said Art St. Cyr, business head unit and vice president of auto operations for American Honda Motor Co. “We have a philosophy at Honda that we want to be a company that society wants to exist. That means we have to protect our customers. ThatÂ’s part of the whole mantra of doing this.” Opened in 1984, the 1.6 million square-foot Honda R&D Americas facility, located in the countryside about 45 miles northwest of Columbus, employs around 1,600 people and is HondaÂ’s largest research-and-development facility outside of Japan. Its Advanced Safety Research facility opened in 2003.
Toyota tops Consumer Reports best, worst used car values
Tue, 18 Mar 2014We often mock Toyota for building boring, soulless cars, but a new study by Consumer Reports suggests that regardless of whether that's true, the company has some of the best used cars on the market. In its report on used cars from 2004-2013, the Japanese automaker had 11 vehicles among its brands on the list - more than any other automaker.
CR breaks the list down by cost and vehicle size, and Toyota has at least one entry at every price point and in nearly every segment. To score a recommendation, a vehicle had to perform well in the magazine's initial tests and score above-average reliability results. It also tried to only suggest cars with electronic stability control. Of the 28 recommended vehicles, Honda/Acura had the second most mentions at six, and Ford, Hyundai and Subaru managed two each.
The Detroit brands also made it to the list, but not in a positive way. Consumer Reports compiled a list of 22 vehicles it wouldn't recommend because "they have multiple years of much-worse-than-average overall reliability." General Motors had the most unrecommended models on the list at six, but Chrysler and Ford weren't far behind, with five cars each from their brands not making the grade. The full list of recommendations is available on CR's website.














