2014 Nissan Rogue Sv on 2040-cars
615 W Marketview Dr, Champaign, Illinois, United States
Engine:2.5L I4 16V MPFI DOHC
Transmission:Automatic CVT
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 5N1AT2MT8EC832313
Stock Num: N14369
Make: Nissan
Model: Rogue SV
Year: 2014
Exterior Color: Black
Interior Color: Black
Options: Drive Type: FWD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 10
FUEL EFFICIENT 33 MPG Hwy/26 MPG City! CD Player, Multi-Zone A/C, Back-Up Camera, Alloy Wheels, Overhead Airbag, Bluetooth Connection, Auxiliary Audio Input, Satellite Radio. SV trim. CLICK NOW!======KEY FEATURES INCLUDE: Back-Up Camera, Satellite Radio, Auxiliary Audio Input, Bluetooth Connection, CD Player, Aluminum Wheels, Multi-Zone A/C. Rear Spoiler, MP3 Player, Privacy Glass, Keyless Entry, Child Safety Locks. ======EXPERTS REPORT: KBB.com's review says By incorporating a satisfying blend of SUV, sedan and wagon DNA, the versatile 5-passenger Nissan Rogue can accommodate a wide variety of unique uses. That's why we named it one of the 10 Best SUVs Under $25, 000 for 2014.. Great Gas Mileage: 33 MPG Hwy. Dealer not responsible for pricing errors. Fuel economy calculations based on original manufacturer data for trim engine configuration. Please confirm the accuracy of the included equipment by calling us prior to purchase.
Nissan Rogue for Sale
2014 nissan rogue s(US $25,380.00)
2013 nissan rogue sv(US $24,597.00)
2014 nissan rogue sl(US $31,060.00)
2014 nissan rogue select s(US $21,270.00)
2014 nissan rogue select s(US $21,280.00)
2014 nissan rogue select s(US $22,090.00)
Auto Services in Illinois
Wickstrom Chrysler Jeep Dodge ★★★★★
White Eagle Auto Body Shop ★★★★★
Walter`s Foreign Car Serv ★★★★★
Tyson Motor Corp ★★★★★
Triple X Transport Refrigeration & Trailer Repair ★★★★★
Total Car Total Care Inc ★★★★★
Auto blog
Nissan GT-R and Ferrari 458 Speciale in track battle by Evo
Thu, 14 Aug 2014Supercar slayer. That's what they call the Nissan GT-R. And in many ways it is, even though its price and performance over the years have risen to put it squarely in supercar territory of its own right.
In fact, as Evo magazine has been compiling a list of its fastest cars - using the Anglesey Circuit in Wales as its common ground - the GT-R has came out on top... that is, until Evo tested the Ferrari 458 Speciale. The two are about as different as you can get within the supercar segment: one has a turbo six up front driving all four wheels in a 2+2 configuration, the other a mid-engined, rear-drive V8 two-seater. In fact the only common ground you're likely to find between them comes down to their two doors and dual-clutch transmissions. Though they serve it up in different ways, both are class-leading performers.
We're looking forward to watching Evo populate its leaderboard with more entries like the McLaren 650S and more potent Nismo GT-R, but in the meantime the British enthusiast magazine, by popular demand, has released side-by-side in-car footage of both supercars putting their best lap forward around the seaside circuit.
Nissan Zeod RC crash test looks like crushing the tip on a pencil
Fri, 16 May 2014Nissan has already showed us the 1.5-liter, three-cylinder engine 400 horsepower and 280 pound-feet of torque, augmented by an electric motor, that sits in back of the ZEOD RC headed for the 24 Hours of Le Mans. At the ZEOD RC's other end is a carbon fiber crash structure that has to be tested against an immovable object, and Nissan has seen fit to show us that, too.
You know what to expect if you've seen a crash test before, but the really pointy nose on this car reminds us of a Faber Castell HB pencil being sent to its death. Better yet, it's in slow motion, and you can watch it below.
Tier 1 suppliers call GM the worst OEM to work with
Mon, 12 May 2014Among automakers with a big US presence, General Motors is the worst to work for, according to a new survey from Tier 1 automotive suppliers, conducted by Planning Perspectives, Inc.
The Detroit-based manufacturer, which has been under fire following the ignition switch recall and its accompanying scandal, finished behind six other automakers with big US manufacturing operations. Suppliers had issues with trust and communications, as well as intellectual property protection. GM was also the least likely to allow suppliers to raise their prices in the face of unexpected increases in material cost, all of which contributed to 55 percent of suppliers saying their relationship with GM was "poor to very poor."
GM's cross-town competitors didn't fare much better. Chrysler finished in fifth place, ahead of GM and behind Dearborn-based Ford, which was passed for third place this year by Nissan. Toyota took the top marks, while Honda captured second place.