2004 Ford Ranger Xlt Extended Cab Pickup 2-door 4.0l on 2040-cars
Laval, Quebec, Canada
|
UP FOR AUCTION IS A 2004 FORD RANGER XLT 2 DOOR EXTENDED CAB PICK UP. THE TRUCK HAS A 4.0 L 6 CYLINDER ENGINE, AUTOMATIC TRANSMISION AND IS A 4 WHEEL DRIVE TRUCK. THE TRUCK HAS NEW BRAKES AND DISKS UP FRONT AND GOOD REARS, THIS WAS A NON SMOKER VEHICLE. THE TRUCK HAS A BEAUTIFUL TWO TONE BLACK INTERIOR THAT IS IN EXCELLENT CONDITION, IT ALSO HAS 2 SMALL SEATS IN THE REAR . IT HAS AN AM/FM RADIO WITH CD. I INSTALLED AN I-PHONE, MP3 JACK (WHICH CAN BE REMOVED IF NOT REQUIRED). THE RANGER HAS POWER WINDOWS AND DOOR LOCKS, , AIR CONDITIONING. THERE IS ALSO A FACTORY BEDLINER IN EXCELLENT SHAPE AS WELL AS A BED COVER. THE BODY AND PAINT OF THIS TRUCK IS ALL ORIGINAL (INCLUDING PAINT) AND IS IN EXCEL;LENT CONDITION FOR THE YEAR AND MILAGE. THERE ARE SOME MINOR SCUFFS AND SCRATCHES BUT NOTHING THAT NEEDS TO BE REPAIRED AS IT IS IN EXCELLENT CONDITION. THE 4.0 LITRE MOTOR RUNS EXCELLENT, WITH NO ISSUES WHATSOEVER. NO DASH LIGHTS OR WARNING LAMPS ON. THE TRANSMISION SHIFTS AS IT SHOULD AND THE 4X4 ENGAGES AND DISENGAGES AS IT SHOULD. MECHANICALLY THIS TRUCK IS VERY SOUND AND SHOULD PROVIDE THE NEW OWNER WITH YEARS OF RELIABLE USE. IT HAS RECENTLY PASSED INSPECTION AND PASSED WITH FLYING COLORS. THE SUSPENSION IS ALL IN EXCELLENT CONDITION AND DRIVES DOWN THE ROAD PERFECTLY, VERY SMOOTH WITH NO RATTLES OR ISSUES. IT WAS NEVER USED AS A WORK TRUCK (INDICATED BY ITS GREAT SHAPE) THE TIRES OF THE TRUCK ARE ABOUT 75% WORN . THIS IS THE ONLY THING I CAN THINK OF THAT MAY NEED ATTENTION IN THE NEAR FUTURE. COULD STILL BE DRIVEN AS IS . THIS IS UP TO THE NEW OWNER THE RANGER WAS WELL CARED FOR AND IS IN EXCELLENT SHAPE. THE RANGER HAS 139351 MILES, IT HAS BEEN WELL MAINTAINED .
I WOULD NOT HESITATE TO DRIVE THIS TRUCK ANYWHERE
THE RESERVE IS SET LOW, AS I DON'T USE THE TRUCK AS MUCH NOW
iF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL ME AT 450 688-2433, I WOULD BE HAPPY TO ANSWER THEM
E MAIL ME WITH ANY QUESTIONS OR IF YOU NEED ANY ADDITIONAL PICTURES. WE MAY BE ABLE TO HELP WITH DELIVERY. A 500 DOWN PAYMENT IS DUE AT THE END OF THE AUCTION. THE BALANCE WITHIN 7 DAYS.
IF YOU DO NOT HAVE THE FUNDS, OR DO NOT INTEND TO FOLLOW THROUGH WITH THE TRANSACTION PLEASE DO NOT BID. GOOD LUCK |
Ford Ranger for Sale
1985 ford ranger pro street
Free shipping 2wd xl automatic cloth interior bedliner tow hitch free shipping(US $9,595.00)
4x4 supercab clean car-fax 2 previous owners look great runs great no reserve
Xlt 2dr exte 4.0l rear wheel drive tires - front all-season power steering abs(US $3,995.00)
1994 ford ranger xlt 5 speed standard cab pickup 2-door 2.3l .......no reserve(US $1,500.00)
04 ranger edge sport extended cab auto v6 carfax certified we finance texas(US $6,990.00)
Auto blog
EPA says fuel economy test for hybrids is accurate
Mon, 26 Aug 2013
The EPA says it stands behind its fuel economy test for hybrid vehicles following controversy about the testing process after Ford C-Max Hybrid customers and automotive journalists alike struggled to achieve 47 miles per gallon, the advertised mpg number, Automotive News reports. Ford responded to the issue almost two weeks ago by claiming that a 1970s-era EPA general label rule was responsible for the inaccurate mileage numbers, rerating the C-Max Hybrid's mpg numbers and offering customers rebates. Ford later said it didn't overstate the C-Max Hybrid's fuel economy and that it was surprised by the low numbers.
Ford technically didn't do anything wrong because it was following the general label rule, but agency regulator Christopher Grundler says the automaker was exploiting a loophole when it came up with the hybrid C-Max numbers, and that the testing process remains accurate. The general label rule allows vehicles that use the same engine and transmission and are in the same weight class to share fuel economy numbers, but it doesn't take into account other factors such as aerodynamic efficiency, which affects hybrids more drastically than non-hybrid vehicles. Ford originally used the Fusion Hybrid economy figures for the C-Max Hybrid and claimed the engineers didn't realize that its aerodynamic efficiency would affect fuel economy as much as it did.
2015 Ford Mustang fuel economy ratings leaked
Thu, 21 Aug 2014Thinking about buying a new Mustang, but want to know what kind of fuel economy it'll get? Well we have our first indication as the pony-car enthusiasts over at Mustang6G.com have gotten a hold of the Monroney window stickers for a few of the new 2015 Mustang models.
Although the V8 model is not among them, we can now see how the EPA has rated those models with a half dozen pistons or less. The Mustang EcoBoost with the turbo four and a manual transmission has been rated at 22 miles per gallon in the city and 31 on the highway. The V6 manual gets 17 city and 28 highway, while the V6 automatic squeezes out a bit more in the city at 19 mpg but carries the same 28 highway rating.
By way of comparison, the latest Chevy Camaro with the V6 and a stick shift gets the same 17/28 EPA rating as a similarly equipped new 'Stang, and the V6 automatic Camaro gets 18/27 (slightly behind the Ford, but if you opt for the Camaro 2LS with its V6, automatic and 2.92 rear axle ratio, you'll be looking at 19 and 30).
Ford Fiesta ST in startling track battle against Toyota GT86
Wed, 26 Jun 2013On the surface, there's very little that the Ford Fiesta ST and Toyota GT86 (or the Scion FR-S that is sold in the US, or the largely similar Subaru BRZ) share in common. One is a hatchback with power coming from a turbocharged engine routed to the front wheels. The other is a coupe with power coming from a naturally aspirated four-cylinder boxer engine routed to the rear wheels.
Thing is, both of them are reasonably priced performance cars aimed at a similar segment of the automotive marketplace, so a comparison isn't out of the question. It is with all of this in mind that we direct you to the video below, in which the blokes from Evo pit the two manic little machines against one another on a race track. The result? Well, it can be summed up this way: Fast versus fun.
See how the track battle goes down in the video below.