Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2000 Ford Ranger Xlt 3.0l V-6 2d 4x4 (4x4 Not Working) on 2040-cars

Year:2000 Mileage:184928 Color: White /
 Brown
Location:

Brownsville, Texas, United States

Brownsville, Texas, United States
Body Type:Pickup Truck
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:3.0L 182Cu. In. V6 GAS OHV Naturally Aspirated
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Transmission:Automatic
VIN: 1FTZR15V5YTA77111 Year: 2000
Make: Ford
Cab Type (For Trucks Only): Extended Cab
Model: Ranger
Trim: XLT Extended Cab Pickup 2-Door
Options: 4-Wheel Drive, CD Player
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes
Drive Type: 4WD
Power Options: Air Conditioning
Mileage: 184,928
Exterior Color: White
Interior Color: Brown
Disability Equipped: No
Number of Cylinders: 6
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Condition: UsedA vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections.Seller Notes:"Ford Ranger XLT 2 door 4x4 but the 4x4 is not working. Needs repair. Will engage electronically but has a "clanking" sound when you try to move it forward. The motors and transmission run strong. The motor does not burn oil and does not leak oil. Damage: scrapes on the front bumper (pictured, small dents on the body, tailgate has issues with closing, probrabley due to missing or broken cable that holds up the tailgate but it will close (pictured), windsheild is cracked, rear right tailgate light is cracked (pictured), and the heater core has been bypassed (pictured), and the sterring wheel has the plactic broken out where you set the cruise (pictured), as well the truck needs new tires. The perks, the A/C is cold, has a Pendaliner bedliner, has MAAP nerve bars, interior is in good condition with normal wear and tear (pictured), oil pressure (suedo gauge) is radical but can be fixed, common on all ford rangers, cd player (original) with great sound), foglamps."

Auto Services in Texas

Zepco ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Speedometers, Truck Equipment, Parts & Accessories-Wholesale & Manufacturers
Address: 508 N Central Expy, Murphy
Phone: (972) 690-1052

Z Max Auto ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Used Car Dealers
Address: 1705 W Division St, Arlington
Phone: (817) 460-3555

Young`s Trailer Sales ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Trailer Hitches
Address: 11th, Gruver
Phone: (806) 374-8171

Woodys Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 6106 N Dixie Blvd, Gardendale
Phone: (432) 362-1669

Window Magic ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: Hockley
Phone: (281) 362-0640

Wichita Alignment & Brake ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair, Wheels-Aligning & Balancing
Address: 1200 31st St, Holliday
Phone: (940) 322-1919

Auto blog

Ford partnering with MIT, Stanford on autonomous vehicle research

Fri, 24 Jan 2014

Ask any car engineer what's the biggest variable in achieving fuel economy targets, and he'll tell you "the driver." If one human can't understand human driving behavior enough to be certain about an innocuous number like miles per gallon, how is an autonomous car supposed to figure out what hundreds of other drivers are going to do in the course of a day? Ford has enlisted the help of Stanford and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology to find out.
Starting with the automated Fusion Hybrid introduced in December, MIT will be developing algorithms that driverless cars can use to "predict actions of other vehicles and pedestrians" and objects within the three-dimensional map provided by its four LIDAR sensors.
The Stanford team will research how to extend the 'vision' of that LIDAR array beyond obstructions while driving, analogous to the way a driver uses the entire width of a lane to see what's ahead of a larger vehicle in front. Ford says it wants to "provide the vehicle with common sense" as part of its Blueprint for Mobility, preparing for an autonomous world from 2025 and beyond.

KBB 2013 Brand Image Awards has some obvious and oddball winners

Sat, 30 Mar 2013

The sixth edition of the Kelley Blue Book Brand Image Awards have crowned a wide range of winners - in a couple of cases the recipient of the laurels might say more about KBB users than they do about the actual winner. Compiled from the responses of more than 12,000 shoppers on KBB.com over the past year, there are 13 categories broken into non-luxury, luxury and truck segments "representing the combined wisdom of the American car-buying public."
The award categories have been revamped this year, with some dropping off, some new ones appearing and at least one other given a new term. What isn't surprising is that Honda won Most Trusted Brand for the second year running, Best Value Brand for the third year in a row and took Best Overall Brand, which wasn't on last year's list of awards.
On our own shores, in the non-luxury categories Chrysler got Most Refined Brand and Buick took Best Value Luxury Brand. Neither one of those marques won anything in last year's Brand Image Awards, while Cadillac, which won Best Interior Design Brand and Best Comfort Brand last year - those awards disappeared this year - went home without a single accolade.

Nuclear-powered concept cars from the Atomic Age

Thu, 17 Jul 2014

In the 1950s and early 60s, the dawn of nuclear power was supposed to lead to a limitless consumer culture, a world of flying cars and autonomous kitchens all powered by clean energy. In Europe, it offered the then-limping continent a cheap, inexhaustible supply of power after years of rationing and infrastructure damage brought on by two World Wars.
The development of nuclear-powered submarines and ships during the 1940s and 50s led car designers to begin conceptualizing atomic vehicles. Fueled by a consistent reaction, these cars would theoretically produce no harmful byproducts and rarely need to refuel. Combining these vehicles with the new interstate system presented amazing potential for American mobility.
But the fantasy soon faded. There were just too many problems with the realities of nuclear power. For starters, the powerplant would be too small to attain a reaction unless the car contained weapons-grade atomic materials. Doing so would mean every fender-bender could result in a minor nuclear holocaust. Additionally, many of the designers assumed a lightweight shielding material or even forcefields would eventually be invented (they still haven't) to protect passengers from harmful radiation. Analyses of the atomic car concept at the time determined that a 50-ton lead barrier would be necessary to prevent exposure.