Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2014 Se Used Certified 2l I4 16v Automatic Fwd Hatchback on 2040-cars

US $16,874.00
Year:2014 Mileage:9227 Color: Red /
 Gray
Location:

Bogart, Georgia, United States

Bogart, Georgia, United States
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Hatchback
Engine:2.0L I4 Covered for Life
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Dealer
Condition:

Certified pre-owned

VIN (Vehicle Identification Number)
: 1FADP3K20EL179679
Year: 2014
Number of Cylinders: 4
Make: Ford
Model: Focus
Warranty: Vehicle has an existing warranty
Drive Type: FWD
Mileage: 9,227
Sub Model: SE Certified
Exterior Color: Red
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Interior Color: Gray

Auto Services in Georgia

ZBest Cars ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers, New Truck Dealers
Address: 3280 Commerce Ave, Avondale-Estates
Phone: (888) 862-8501

Youmans Chevrolet Co ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 2020 Riverside Dr, Elko
Phone: (478) 746-2020

Wren`s Body Shop ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Wheels-Aligning & Balancing
Address: 6402 Fairburn Rd, Douglasville
Phone: (770) 942-5642

Wholesale Tire & Wheel Co ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers
Address: 620 General Courtney Hodges Blvd, Perry
Phone: (478) 987-4794

Walton Tire Co ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Tire Dealers
Address: 290 Lee Byrd Rd, Winder
Phone: (770) 466-4447

TJ Custom Muffler & Brake ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Mufflers & Exhaust Systems, Brake Repair
Address: 3998 Center Hill Church Rd, Monroe
Phone: (770) 554-4496

Auto blog

Ford files trademark application for 'Model E'

Fri, 27 Dec 2013

In early December, Ford filed an application with the US Patent and Trademark Office for the name "Model E." Historically, Ford never produced a Model E, and while automakers are known to file for trademarks they never use, some have wondered if the application might be used for a concept car.
Based on other recent events, though, it could be a legal move. In 2000 Ford sued an online start-up called Model E over the similarity of that name to Ford's industry-shaping Model T, but the judge dismissed the case citing lack of proper grounds. In August 2013, Tesla applied for trademark registration for Model E, and at the time, Ford said it would review the application. Tesla actually made two applications for Model E, one for automobiles and structural parts therefore, the other for "providing maintenance and repair services for automobiles," and there are plenty of theories about what the name could be applied to.
The Published for Opposition date for Tesla's applications is December 31, 2013, after which anyone who thinks they'd be harmed by Tesla being granted the trademark gets 30 days to register their issues. This is just speculation, but Ford's application - which was filed for automobiles only - might be about protecting what it sees as unwelcome encroachment on the name Model T, protection it wasn't able to enforce before when the stakes were only online and much smaller.

1979 Dodge Li'l Red Express in Generation Gap showdown with 1933 Ford Pickup

Fri, 18 Jul 2014

Auto enthusiasts love a good debate, whether it's Mustang versus Camaro or Ferrari against Lamborghini. But how about a battle between two very different vintages of classic pickup trucks? In this case, the fight is between a 1979 Dodge Li'l Red Express and a 1933 Ford Model 46 truck with a flathead V8.
The shootout comes courtesy of the internet series Generation Gap, and its concept is super-simple. One guy prefers classics, and the other likes newer rides. They choose a category, pick two vehicles and put them head to head. In this case, neither is exactly modern, though. The Ford is more than old enough to receive Social Security checks, and the Dodge is hardly a young whippersnapper.
Other than both being pickups, these two models were made to serve very different functions. The Li'l Red Express was basically the progenitor of today's muscle trucks, with a big V8 that made it one of the quickest new models in its day (admittedly, 1979 was a rough time for automotive performance). On the other hand, the '33 Ford was just meant to work, with little pretense for anything else. One of the hosts describes it as "the simplest, most difficult" vehicle he's driven because of the tricky double clutchwork necessary to shift gears. Scroll down to watch the video and try to decide which of these two American classics you would rather have in your garage.

Ford C-Max sales hold steady despite fuel economy fracas

Mon, 09 Sep 2013

Despite the ballyhoo that accompanied Ford's lowering of the C-Max fuel economy figures, the Blue Oval is still seeing strong demand for the five-seat MPV, as Automotive News reports. Speaking to marketing boss Jim Farley, AN says that the controversy surrounding the C-Max's fuel economy figures won't force Ford to change its marketing strategy.
Ford lowered the fuel economy rating of the C-Max after public outcry and legal action by customers that were unable to reach the 47 miles per gallon promised by the window sticker. The new ratings were dropped about a month ago to 45 mpg on the freeway and 40 mpg in the city. Ford offered rebates for current C-Max owners, with $550 going to those that bought their car and $325 to lessees. The issue, says Ford, stemmed from testing standards that allowed the automaker to base the C-Max's fuel economy on the Fusion Hybrid, because they use identical powertrains. The C-Max's less aerodynamic shape wasn't taken into account, though.
Whether Ford's PR team handled the crises perfectly or people just aren't that bothered by a four-mpg drop in combined ratings, demand remains strong for the C-Max among consumers. Ford moved 3,000 units in August, which was a 12-percent jump over July sales. Meanwhile, consumer demand through third-party shopping websites remains strong as well, according to Autometrics, a data analysis company that spoke with Automotive News. While the long-term effects of the adjustments remain unknown, the C-Max appears to have fared well in the near term.