Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2007 Ford Drw on 2040-cars

US $22,995.00
Year:2007 Mileage:81418 Color: White /
 Gray
Location:

1134 S Main St, Laurinburg, North Carolina, United States

1134 S Main St, Laurinburg, North Carolina, United States
Fuel Type:Diesel
Engine:6.0L V8 32V DDI OHV Turbo Diesel
Transmission:5-Speed Automatic
Condition: Used
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1FDXW46PX7EA95510
Stock Num: SM07253
Make: Ford
Model: DRW
Year: 2007
Exterior Color: White
Interior Color: Gray
Options:
  • 4 Door
  • 4-wheel ABS Brakes
  • AM/FM stereo
  • Clock: In-radio display
  • Coil front spring
  • Diameter of tires: 19.5"
  • Door reinforcement: Side-impact door beam
  • Dual Rear Wheels
  • Fixed antenna
  • Front and rear reading lights
  • Front and rear suspension stabilizer bars
  • Front Head Room: 41.3"
  • Front Hip Room: 67.4"
  • Front Leg Room: 41.0"
  • Front Shoulder Room: 68.0"
  • Front Ventilated disc brakes
  • Fuel Capacity: 40.0 gal.
  • Gross vehicle weight: 16,000 lbs.
  • Instrumentation: Low fuel level
  • Leaf rear spring
  • Leaf rear suspension
  • Left rear passenger door type: Conventional
  • Manual extendable trailer style exterior mirrors
  • Non-independent front suspension classification
  • Other front suspension
  • Overall height: 80.8"
  • Overall Width: 93.6"
  • Passenger Airbag
  • Plastic/rubber shift knob trim
  • Power steering
  • Rear Head Room: 40.8"
  • Rear Hip Room: 67.3"
  • Rear Leg Room: 41.7"
  • Rear Shoulder Room: 68.0"
  • Rear Stabilizer Bar: Regular
  • Regular front stabilizer bar
  • Right rear passenger door type: Conventional
  • Rigid axle rear suspension
  • Suspension class: Firm
  • Tachometer
  • Tires: Load Rating: F
  • Tires: Prefix: LT
  • Tires: Profile: 70
  • Tires: Speed Rating: S
  • Tires: Width: 225 mm
  • Two 12V DC power outlets
  • Type of tires: AS
  • Variable intermittent front wipers
  • Vehicle Emissions: LEV II
  • Wheel Diameter: 19.5
  • Wheel Width: 6
Drive Type: RWD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 81418

Auto Services in North Carolina

Your Automotive Service Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Diagnostic Service, Automobile Electric Service
Address: 1707 Battleground Ave, Mc-Leansville
Phone: (866) 595-6470

Whistle`s Body Shop ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Truck Body Repair & Painting
Address: 100 Ranch Dr, Mint-Hill
Phone: (704) 882-2033

Village Motor Werks ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 234 S Boylan Ave, Raleigh
Phone: (919) 832-0899

Tyrolf Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Inspection Stations & Services, Alternators & Generators-Automotive Repairing
Address: 7513 Knightdale Blvd, Knightdale
Phone: (919) 217-5621

Turner Towing & Recovery ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Towing, Automotive Roadside Service
Address: Rougemont
Phone: (919) 219-9096

Triangle Auto & Truck Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Truck Service & Repair
Address: 3511 Nc 55 Hwy, Apex
Phone: (919) 467-1376

Auto blog

Ford's J Mays feels vindicated by Fusion reception

Tue, 25 Sep 2012

It's hard to think back now, but the same man overseeing the design of the 2013 Ford Fusion also presided over a rather lackluster period in Ford design, highlighted by vehicles like the Five Hundred and Freestyle. With the redesigned Fusion receiving high praise, J Mays tells Automotive News that he feels vindicated from criticisms suggesting he's not a daring enough designer.
When Mays took over as lead of design in 1997, he admits to having quite an ego ("My head would barely fit through the door some days. I've long since gotten over myself") and the workload to match. With the Blue Oval's portfolio full of premium brands like Aston Martin, Jaguar, Land Rover and Volvo at that point, along with the bread-and-butter Ford, Lincoln and Mercury models, Mays certainly had quite the challenge.
It was in the mid-2000s that Mays took over just the premium brands, and took on the new title of Chief Creative Officer. At the time, Mays endured some criticism for looking backwards to retro styling, rather than setting a new standard for American car design - criticism that Mays says he is free from with the all-new Fusion.

2015 Ford Focus Electric hides in plain sight

Wed, 16 Apr 2014

The styling changes to the 2015 Ford Focus were shown off at the recent Geneva Motor Show, so what the EV version looks like is not that much of a surprise. Still, the 2015 Focus Electric is making its world debut here at the New York Auto Show, so we wanted to know what changes we are looking at compared to both the internal combustion engine version and the earlier EV models.
The exterior visual distinctions between the ICE and EV are minimal, and basically nonexistent from the A-pillar to the rear. Up front, you can see the charge port, of course, but the front fascia has also undergone a bit of an adjustment. The front doesn't have the ICE version's flattened grille and the EV's Ford logo creates a bump in the hood line where none exists on the ICE. The 2015's grille is also different than the one on the 2014 Focus Electric, being slightly smaller (you can see this better if you compare pictures in our new gallery above to these of the 2011 Focus Electric and these of the gas-powered 2015 Focus).
The updated 2015 interior - which we couldn't access ourselves - has things like a new center stack, improved cupholders and is basically identical between the gas and electric models. With the car off, you can't even tell if you're in an EV or ICE, Seema Bardwaj, the US brand manager for the Focus, told AutoblogGreen. The only things that are different, she said, are extra menu screens to show EV powertrain information to the driver.

Tier 1 suppliers call GM the worst OEM to work with

Mon, 12 May 2014

Among automakers with a big US presence, General Motors is the worst to work for, according to a new survey from Tier 1 automotive suppliers, conducted by Planning Perspectives, Inc.
The Detroit-based manufacturer, which has been under fire following the ignition switch recall and its accompanying scandal, finished behind six other automakers with big US manufacturing operations. Suppliers had issues with trust and communications, as well as intellectual property protection. GM was also the least likely to allow suppliers to raise their prices in the face of unexpected increases in material cost, all of which contributed to 55 percent of suppliers saying their relationship with GM was "poor to very poor."
GM's cross-town competitors didn't fare much better. Chrysler finished in fifth place, ahead of GM and behind Dearborn-based Ford, which was passed for third place this year by Nissan. Toyota took the top marks, while Honda captured second place.