1965 Ford Falcon Futura Convertible 3.3l on 2040-cars
Colchester, Vermont, United States
Body Type:U/K
Engine:3.3L 200Cu. In. l6 GAS Naturally Aspirated
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:GAS
For Sale By:Private Seller
Interior Color: Black
Make: Ford
Number of Cylinders: 6
Model: Falcon
Trim: Futura
Drive Type: U/K
Options: Convertible
Mileage: 100,000
Sub Model: Futura Convertible
Exterior Color: Burgundy
Selling my 1965 Ford Falcon Futura convertible. 6 cylinder, 200cu.in. with automatic transmission. Matching numbers. Southern car with no rust ever. All original body panels, straight as an arrow. Has super rare, original falcon fender skirts. Showroom condition inside, outside, and underneath. New everything (tires, top, shocks, brakes, etc...). Absolutely gorgeous. Runs and drives like a dream. Needs nothing, ready to drive and go to shows. Please feel free to e-mail with any questions or call Dave at (802) 863-2339
Ford Falcon for Sale
- 1967 ford falcon futura 24k original miles
- 1963 ford falcon futura 2.8l(US $21,000.00)
- 1963 ford falcon futura convertible with power top, 289 v8, power disc brakes(US $18,900.00)
- 1963 ford falcon futura 260 v8 - very good, all original
- 1963 ford falcon futura 2.8l convertible california car(US $8,500.00)
- 1960 ford falcon 2 door wagon arizona rust free car
Auto Services in Vermont
Napa Auto Parts ★★★★★
Groton Garage Main ★★★★★
Everything Automotive & Tires ★★★★★
Blackfork Emergency Services ★★★★★
Abair`s Quality Car Care ★★★★★
Rpm Motor Sales ★★★★
Auto blog
Ford hybrid sales rebound following MPG controversy
Sun, 31 Aug 2014Ford hybrid customers apparently have very short memories. With two EPA fuel economy reratings in the last year, sales of the C-Max, Fusion Hybrid and Lincoln MKZ haven't been too terribly dented, Ward's Auto reports.
All three vehicles saw sales dips following the August 2013 rerating, although sales of the MKZ Hybrid had begun to rebound as early as November of that year. C-Max sales, meanwhile, took slightly longer, with sales on a steadily improving course as early as February of this year.
The second rerating, in June of this year, has had an even smaller effect on the Blue Oval's hybrids. The C-Max has actually been subject to a sales increase, while both the MKZ and Fusion saw minor sales drops (less than 400 units between the two in the month following the rerating).
Project Ugly Horse: Part V
Mon, 11 Feb 2013The Slippery Slope
I've had a healthy appreciation for cars that stop since one truly unfortunate incident with a runaway 1971 Lincoln Continental.
It's funny how quickly a party can turn from, "We're all having blast" to "What happened to the front of the house, and how many stitches do you think this is going to take?" Standing in a Mustang salvage shop in Kodak, Tennessee, I couldn't help but feel I had strayed into the latter territory with Ugly Horse. There was a supercharged 5.4-liter V8 plucked from a rear-ended Cobra sitting off to my left. The shelves were lined with second-hand Roush and SVT components galore, but I couldn't stop staring at a set of rotors with the approximate diameter of my chest.
EPA says fuel economy test for hybrids is accurate
Mon, 26 Aug 2013
The EPA says it stands behind its fuel economy test for hybrid vehicles following controversy about the testing process after Ford C-Max Hybrid customers and automotive journalists alike struggled to achieve 47 miles per gallon, the advertised mpg number, Automotive News reports. Ford responded to the issue almost two weeks ago by claiming that a 1970s-era EPA general label rule was responsible for the inaccurate mileage numbers, rerating the C-Max Hybrid's mpg numbers and offering customers rebates. Ford later said it didn't overstate the C-Max Hybrid's fuel economy and that it was surprised by the low numbers.
Ford technically didn't do anything wrong because it was following the general label rule, but agency regulator Christopher Grundler says the automaker was exploiting a loophole when it came up with the hybrid C-Max numbers, and that the testing process remains accurate. The general label rule allows vehicles that use the same engine and transmission and are in the same weight class to share fuel economy numbers, but it doesn't take into account other factors such as aerodynamic efficiency, which affects hybrids more drastically than non-hybrid vehicles. Ford originally used the Fusion Hybrid economy figures for the C-Max Hybrid and claimed the engineers didn't realize that its aerodynamic efficiency would affect fuel economy as much as it did.