'89 Ford Bronco Xlt, Low Miles! on 2040-cars
Harrisburg, South Dakota, United States
Body Type:SUV
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:4.9L I6
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Year: 1989
Make: Ford
Model: Bronco
Trim: XLT
Options: Cassette Player, 4-Wheel Drive
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows
Drive Type: 4WD
Mileage: 99,159
Exterior Color: Maroon on Cream
Disability Equipped: No
Interior Color: Maroon
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Number of Cylinders: 6
I have for sale a 1989 Ford Bronco XLT. I am the 3rd owner, and I know the second owner quite well. It was purchased new in Madison, WI by an elderly gentleman who didn't drive much. He put almost 90,000 miles on it before selling it to my friend in Fargo, ND about 6 years ago. He used it as a hunting vehicle in rural North Dakota for 5 years until I bought it from him about a year ago. In that time he did a lot of maintenance typical of a late 80's Ford. He replaced the gas tank and fuel lines, had the top end of the engine tuned, rear brake lines replaced, new clutch, new shocks, and had some electrical replaced. That's what I remember for sure. I'm positive he did more, but I don't remember exactly what and I don't want to speculate. The tires were installed less than 5,000 miles ago. I had the rear window motor rebuilt. I replaced the front pads and rear shoes (I have extra shoes). I also have some extra parts for a few projects that I wanted to do. I have new plugs and wires, a new distributor cap, and a upgraded ignition. I wanted to change the timing but never got around to it. I also have new tail lights that I haven't installed yet. As you can see in the pictures all of the glass is intact. The top comes off with ease. I had it off almost all summer. I have never had a hiccup with it starting or running. The interior is super clean and has always been a non-smokers vehicle. Now for the bad. The drive shaft that connects the transmission to the transfer case needs new u-joints, and I just haven't gotten around to changing them yet. It has your typical rear fender and tailgate rust that is really common for Broncos of this age. Luckily its practically rust free forward of the doors. The wiper sprayers have never worked, but I can hear the motor working so it's probably a clog. I have the truck listed locally so I reserve the right to end the auction at anytime. I'm also up for meeting within 100 miles to complete a purchase.
Features: - 4.9L I6 - 5 speed Manual Transmission - Power Locks - Power Windows - Air Conditioning - Auto Locking Front Hubs - Cruise Control - XLT Trim - Full Size Spare Good: - Less Than 100K Miles - 16 MPG City - Rare Drivetrain Combo - Lots of new parts - Extra Parts Included - Clean Interior - Newer Tires Bad: - Rear Rust - Needs a new u-joint - Wiper sprayers do not work |
Ford Bronco for Sale
- 1974 ford bronco project truck
- 1972 ford bronco v8 arizona rust free
- 1971 ford bronco v8 auto 4x4 pb ps! matt black lifted go anywhere
- 1973 ford bronco explorer half cab - recent frame off restoration!
- 1967 ford bronco very clean really sharp
- 1977 ford bronco sport 302 auto ps pdb uncut nice driver all original look!
Auto Services in South Dakota
Witte Custom Restoration ★★★★★
J & J Truck & Auto Body ★★★★★
Dales A-1 Transmission Service ★★★★★
Loren`s Windshield Repair ★★★★
Tripp County Transmission & Used Cars ★★★★
Thelin Auto Body ★★★★
Auto blog
2013 North American Car and Truck/Utility of the Year finalists announced [w/poll]
Wed, 12 Dec 20122012 is almost in the books and automakers are spending December gearing up for the 2013 auto show season, which tips off next month at the Detroit Auto Show. Traditionally, the latter opens up with the announcement of the North American Car and Truck/Utility of the Year awards, and this year figures to be no different.
But up until this moment, we didn't know which six vehicles would be parked ahead of the stage as finalists, with executives and engineers waiting for the winners to be disclosed. Whittled down from October's "short list" of nominees (11 cars and 10 truck/utility vehicles), the finalists are as follows:
2013 North American Car of the Year:
More evidence GT500-replacement will be named GT350
Tue, 17 Dec 2013During the recent unveiling of the 2015 Ford Mustang, we saw the car in both V6 and GT form, but we'll have to wait a little bit longer to see the successor to the Shelby GT500. In the meantime, though, it looks like SVTPerformance.com has confirmed reports that this high-performance model will bring the Shelby GT350 name back to Ford.
According to the forum post, a user found the Shelby GT350 name on a Ford promo website listing its 2015 lineup. The Shelby GT350 name was first used on a Mustang back in 1965, and most recently it has been a model created for customers as a post-title purchase by Shelby American. As for that car, Shelby confirmed earlier in the year that its GT350 would be phased out at the end of this month.
The million-dollar question for Mustang and Shelby enthusiasts is when we'll see next factory Shelby GT350. Last we heard it was planned for a debut at the New York Auto Show. We've included our previous spy shots of this hi-po, sixth-gen Mustang, and we've also captured it on spy video showing off its exhaust note.
Nuclear-powered concept cars from the Atomic Age
Thu, 17 Jul 2014In the 1950s and early 60s, the dawn of nuclear power was supposed to lead to a limitless consumer culture, a world of flying cars and autonomous kitchens all powered by clean energy. In Europe, it offered the then-limping continent a cheap, inexhaustible supply of power after years of rationing and infrastructure damage brought on by two World Wars.
The development of nuclear-powered submarines and ships during the 1940s and 50s led car designers to begin conceptualizing atomic vehicles. Fueled by a consistent reaction, these cars would theoretically produce no harmful byproducts and rarely need to refuel. Combining these vehicles with the new interstate system presented amazing potential for American mobility.
But the fantasy soon faded. There were just too many problems with the realities of nuclear power. For starters, the powerplant would be too small to attain a reaction unless the car contained weapons-grade atomic materials. Doing so would mean every fender-bender could result in a minor nuclear holocaust. Additionally, many of the designers assumed a lightweight shielding material or even forcefields would eventually be invented (they still haven't) to protect passengers from harmful radiation. Analyses of the atomic car concept at the time determined that a 50-ton lead barrier would be necessary to prevent exposure.
2040Cars.com © 2012-2024. All Rights Reserved.
Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.
Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of the 2040Cars User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
0.045 s, 7202 u