144 Inch Wheel Base. 1 Owner. No Accidents on 2040-cars
Cleveland, Tennessee, United States
Body Type:Minivan, Van
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Diesel
For Sale By:Dealer
Make: Dodge
Model: Sprinter
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Mileage: 146,307
Sub Model: 2500 144" WB
Options: CD Player
Exterior Color: Other
Power Options: Power Locks
Interior Color: Black
Number of Cylinders: 6
Dodge Sprinter for Sale
- 04 dodge sprinter cargo van,mercedes 2.7l diesel,huge cargo area/140" wb
- Sprinter passenger van limousine mercedes benz 2.7l diesel only 91k miles dodge(US $19,995.00)
- 2003 freightliner sprinter 2500 fedex van diesel(US $5,990.00)
- 2007 sprinter 3500 freightliner cab and chassis box truck 134k low miles diesel(US $11,995.00)
- 2002 dodge sprinter 2500 158" w'b super high ex fedex clean!(US $7,995.00)
- 2007 dodge sprinter - mobile marketing sampling unit
Auto Services in Tennessee
Troy`s Auto Repair ★★★★★
Tire World & Auto Service ★★★★★
Snider Automotive ★★★★★
Simple Auto Repair ★★★★★
Safari Auto Sales ★★★★★
Roberts Auto Sales Lot 1 ★★★★★
Auto blog
1979 Dodge Li'l Red Express in Generation Gap showdown with 1933 Ford Pickup
Fri, 18 Jul 2014Auto enthusiasts love a good debate, whether it's Mustang versus Camaro or Ferrari against Lamborghini. But how about a battle between two very different vintages of classic pickup trucks? In this case, the fight is between a 1979 Dodge Li'l Red Express and a 1933 Ford Model 46 truck with a flathead V8.
The shootout comes courtesy of the internet series Generation Gap, and its concept is super-simple. One guy prefers classics, and the other likes newer rides. They choose a category, pick two vehicles and put them head to head. In this case, neither is exactly modern, though. The Ford is more than old enough to receive Social Security checks, and the Dodge is hardly a young whippersnapper.
Other than both being pickups, these two models were made to serve very different functions. The Li'l Red Express was basically the progenitor of today's muscle trucks, with a big V8 that made it one of the quickest new models in its day (admittedly, 1979 was a rough time for automotive performance). On the other hand, the '33 Ford was just meant to work, with little pretense for anything else. One of the hosts describes it as "the simplest, most difficult" vehicle he's driven because of the tricky double clutchwork necessary to shift gears. Scroll down to watch the video and try to decide which of these two American classics you would rather have in your garage.
Consumer Reports says these are the worst new cars of 2014
Thu, 27 Feb 2014Consumer Reports has announced its annual list of worst vehicles, a cringe-inducing contrast to its list of top vehicles. Ignominiously leading the way in 2014 is Chrysler, which has a staggering seven models listed.
Jeep nearly sweeps the small SUV segment by itself, with its Compass, Patriot and 2.4-liter version of the new Cherokee, while the only midsize sedans listed by CR were the Chrysler 200 and Dodge Avenger. The new Dodge Dart and the Dodge Journey round out CR's condemnation of Chrysler.
Ford is taking heat as well, with the Taurus, Edge and their counterparts from Lincoln all listed as the worst vehicles in their respective segments. Toyota doesn't fare much better, with its Lexus IS, Scion iQ and tC also making the list.
25,000 Jeep Grand Cherokee, Dodge Durango SUVs recalled over brake feel
Mon, 10 Mar 2014Chrysler has announced that it is recalling over 25,000 Jeep Grand Cherokee and Dodge Durango SUVs from several markets over concerns about brake feel under hard braking. The affected models are from the 2012 and 2013 model years, although the actual dates of production aren't available. 18,700 are in the US, while 825 are in Canada, 530 are in Mexico and a further 5,200 outside of North America.
According to a statement, Chrysler was informed of the issue by a component supplier for the Ready Alert Braking system, which primes the brakes in anticipation of an emergency stop. A component in the system was restricting the flow of brake fluid too much.
As Chrysler is quick to point out, the way the brakes functioned was in compliance with regulations and there are no reported cases of drivers losing braking power. Instead, the issue rests with what Chrysler calls a pedal feel that "was not consistent with customer expectations." So it would seem Chrysler is being proactive and fixing a problem not because there's a legal issue at work, but simply because it doesn't feel the way the manufacturer wants it to. Well done.