2013 Chrysler 200 Touring on 2040-cars
2050 Roanoke Street, Christiansburg, Virginia, United States
Engine:3.6L V6 24V MPFI DOHC
Transmission:6-Speed Automatic
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1C3CCBBG9DN703684
Stock Num: A3937
Make: Chrysler
Model: 200 Touring
Year: 2013
Exterior Color: Black Clearcoat
Interior Color: Black
Options: Drive Type: FWD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 14547
Duncan Certified. You'll NEVER pay too much at Duncan Honda! Perfect Color Combination! Type your sentence here. Previous owner purchased it brand new! Want to save some money? Get the NEW look for the used price on this one owner vehicle. Buying an used car can be a risky proposition, but with the protection of pre-owned certification, you won't be left out in the cold as soon as you drive off the lot. This vehicle comes with a 6 year/100,000 Mile Limited Powertrain Warranty!!!
Chrysler 200 Series for Sale
- 2012 chrysler 200 touring(US $13,900.00)
- 2014 chrysler 200 touring(US $23,490.00)
- 2013 chrysler 200 limited(US $17,995.00)
- 2015 chrysler 200 limited(US $24,250.00)
- 2014 chrysler 200 touring(US $25,145.00)
- 2015 chrysler 200 s(US $29,730.00)
Auto Services in Virginia
Wiygul Automotive Clinic ★★★★★
Valle Auto Service ★★★★★
Trusted Auto Care ★★★★★
Stanton`s Towing ★★★★★
Southside Collision ★★★★★
Silas Suds Mobile Detailing ★★★★★
Auto blog
What the Chrysler 200 will probably look like in convertible form
Thu, 16 Jan 2014Since 1996, Chrysler has offered a convertible version of its Sebring and 200. As this seems very unlikely to change, it's safe to assume that a new 200 Convertible is in the works following the unveiling of the radically redesigned sedan. What it will look like, though, remains an open question.
Traditionally, the only major styling differences between the Sebring/200 Convertible and the sedan were found above the beltline. It's likely a 2016 200 Convertible would follow a similar philosophy, especially considering the dashing good looks of the redesigned sedan.
Artist Theophilus Chin has a similar idea, as shown in a pair of renderings he's released. Using a few of the stock photos from the 200 Sedan's reveal, Chin has given us our first glimpse of what a 200 Convertible could looks like. It's sharp, retaining the good looks of the sedan. The windshield looks like it's been swept back further, and obviously, there are a pair of doors missing. Other than that, it's the same attractive car that debuted at Detroit.
Merged Fiat-Chrysler HQ will be in London
Fri, 09 May 2014You won't be seeing Sergio Marchionne in his famous sweaters running day-to-day operations of Fiat Chrysler Automobiles from Michigan. Although, he won't be doing it from Italy, either. The FCA CEO recently announced that the company's corporate headquarters would be located in London.
"Headquarters will be in London. It's clear that group executive functions, the board, my office, some of my functions, need to operate out of London, but that doesn't mean that I'm giving up my operational responsibilities of the US," said Marchionne to Automotive News at a press conference.
When the creation of FCA was announced, the company said its tax domicile would be in the United Kingdom. But it gave no specific location at that time. The business is still keeping most of the details under wraps.
Move over Audi, now Chrysler has a beef with Tesla's claims
Thu, 23 May 2013In the same week that Audi said "not so fast" to some claims from Tesla, Chrysler has responded to a new press release from the California-based EV-maker by saying "not exactly, Tesla." The statement, released through the company's blog, comes in response to Tesla claiming it was "the only American car company to have fully repaid the government." Chrysler notes that it, too, recently paid back Uncle Sam from its 2008 bailout. Similar to Audi's recent press release, which was eventually and mysteriously deleted from the German automaker's site, Chrysler is both right and wrong in its statement.
Tesla specifically said that it had paid back the Department of Energy loans that many automakers received - including Fisker and VPG Autos - while Chrysler's retort argues Tesla is "unmistakably incorrect" since it repaid the government in 2011 a full six years early. Technically, the statements from both automakers are correct, but Tesla's startup loan originated from the DoE, while Chrysler's loan came in bailout form from the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). Further, as The Detroit News notes, Chrysler's loan still cost taxpayers well over a billion dollars after all was said and done - those negative assets tied to "old Chrysler" in the bankruptcy did not require repayment.