Keyless Entry Power Seats Limited Slip Rear Diff 6 Speed Manual Ice Cold A/c on 2040-cars
Jackson, Mississippi, United States
|
2002 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 3500HD LS
WATCH THE VIDEO IN 720 HIGH DEF! WATCH TO THE END FOR A TEST DRIVE! If you're looking for the perfect truck to take you deep into the woods or to the business meeting, look no further than this '02 Silverado 3500HD LS. It's powered by the legendary 6.6l Duramax diesel engine with the hard-to-find ZF 6-speed manual transmission. The Z82 trailer towing package
will let you tow the biggest of campers or trailers without breaking a
sweat plus it has the Z85 suspension package to give you the right stance
and ride while doing it. It has the G80 limited slip differential rear so you can rest assured that it will get the job done as
well off road as it does on the highway. Best of all, it runs perfect
and has NO RUST.
Editor's Note: In this article we will only look at the Duramax and its powertrain. At the time of this first drive the 2001 GM Heavy Duty trucks were 95% of the way through their design cycle. Some items on the trucks may yet be changed or modified. We do not yet have firm information related to pricing, warranties, etc. When GM issues announcements about these we will bring them to you ASAP. Forum questions are answered in the right hand column. The Battle Lines Have Been Drawn Since 1993 General Motors and its troops have been fighting a losing battle at the heavy duty end of the pickup truck market. Left without adequate artillery to assault the Dodge and Ford positions, the General has had to make due with increasingly smaller pieces of the high ground where manufacturers battle it out for the bragging rights to claim who's truck is most powerful. The reason: underpowered and underperforming diesel engines. Send word to the front because all that is about to change. The Duramax engine drives great! Those Who Forget History... GM drew upon lessons learned from the redesigned 1994 Dodge Ram and 1996 Ford F-150 to create the latest generation award-winning Silverado and Sierra twins that debuted as 1999 models but something had been definitely missing. Both the Dodge and Ford trucks offered powerful, next generation diesel engines which the GM models have lacked. In 1989 Dodge went to its ally Cummins Diesel for help in creating a powerful diesel engine offering. It found it in the form of Cummins's strong and venerable inline six cylinder diesel that generated more torque than Ford or GM (400 lb. ft. vs. GM's 246 and Ford's 345 at the time of its debut). Combined with the latest generation Ram, sales have rocketed to just over 30% of the heavy duty diesel market. Ford found an ally in big-rig maker Navistar and introduced a new generation of Power Stroke diesel engines in 1999 on its SuperDuty lineup of pickups. The Power Stroke was more fuel efficient and quieter than previous generations of Ford produced diesel engines. Ford has seen its share of the heavy duty market balloon to over 60%. General Motors has been struggling on its own while watching its diesel engine market share fall from 20% back in 1994 to under 10% today. GM has not had a new diesel engine to match the caliber of these fine Ford and Dodge engines since at least 1994. Six years ago General Motors introduced its in-house developed 6.5L diesel, and before that the last new GM diesel was the 6.2L way back in 1982 when it was sent to the frontlines. Well, GM has learned from its own history, and the history of others, and is determined not to repeat it. This time around GM has chosen Isuzu Motors and Allison Transmissions as its allies in the heavy duty truck wars and to that end it has created, or should we say located, its latest diesel engine - the 6.6L Duramax 6600. GM's own Bruce Aileio states that, "Globally Isuzu is recognized as the premier diesel engine design company worldwide." The Great Debate - Maybe Sure to be a point of contention for some heavy duty buyers is the Japanese origins of the Isuzu designed Duramax engine, but consider the following. The Duramax will be built and assembled in Moraine, Ohio at a joint GM / Isuzu facility known as Duramax Ltd. The Duramax uses Bosch fuel injectors of German manufacturing origin. The Allison transmission most Heavy Dutys will probably come with is from an American company and subsidiary of GM. The Allison team worked very closely with Isuzu during all stages of development even going so far as to fly Allison employees to Japan weekly for team meetings and engineering sessions. We consider the Duramax to be a truly global diesel engine and after driving it we believe that folks are going to judge this diesel based on its class leading merits and not on issues related to engine origin. If GM claims hold true, people who do judge this engine and dismiss it because of its design heritage do so at the peril of possibly missing out on an engine with very real economic benefits for those who use heavy duty trucks at work every day. An Aerial View of the Duramax We won't go into all the gory detail here about the 2001 Heavy Duty pickups and Duramax diesel. You can find our first look at the truck and its specifications from our previous coverage of the Duramax introduction. At a high level the new Duramax is rated at a best-in-class 300 horsepower and 520 ft. lb. of torque. The optional Allison automatic transmission is rated at up to 545 ft. lb. of torque and 375 horsepower. A six speed manual is standard. About their transmission Allison says, "Get All The Power You Pay For." General Motors claims the Duramax has best in class fuel economy but official CAFE figures have not yet been released. Informal measurements show gas mileage to be up to 2 mpg plus over competitors' engines. Lifetime durability is also claimed to be class leading with overall engine life expected to be well over 200,000 miles and 50,000 miles between transmission fluid changes. Driven to Win Enough strategic overview and history lessons. On to the drive. GM offered us five trucks to choose from during our test drive, which are listed on the right-hand side of this page. Three GM Duramax equipped Heavy Dutys, one Dodge Cummins and one Ford Power Stroke. The Dodge and Ford trucks were paired with similarly configured GM trucks for the sake of comparison. Unfortunately we never had the chance to drive the Dodge Ram Cummins or its similarly equipped GMC Sierra Duramax counterpart. We left the hotel where we stayed in Phoenix for the first of three 10 mile driving segments to a destination near the Salt River Recreation area in Arizona. It seemed to us that General Motors set the tests up as fair as possible during the entire time, though there were some significant differences in truck setups between 'evenly matched' vehicles. These differences are described below. Though supervised on the outbound portion with GM subject matter experts we were always in the driver's seat. We wanted to find our for ourselves with as little intervention as possible which truck would win this preliminary heavy duty shootout. First Driving Segment - Level Road, City and Freeway Conditions For the first segment we chose truck #5, the Ford F-350 Crew Cab 4x4 with its 7.3L Power Stroke, to help set a baseline. For the purposes of the test the Ford was setup to tow its maximum payload which was a GCWR of 20,000 pounds. The GCWR was simulated by towing a trailer loaded with sand bags for weight and a large Plexiglas wind screen to simulate the aerodynamic drag of say a horse trailer. When you first start the Power Stroke you note its a loud engine, distinctly diesel in tone. On the outside this was very apparent. Inside the cabin the sound is slightly quieter but always omnipresent. Stepping on the gas during a standing start cut the conversation to nil until we got to cruising speeds. Stepping on the gas at speed also created a significant amount of engine clatter. The Ford took its time getting up to speed with its max payload. Stepping on the gas yielded some significant sound and fury but slow and steady progress relative to say a lightly loaded truck. To be expected of course, we know, but somehow you are left wanting for more performance. Some of this had to do with the relatively tall 4.10 axle ratio. Nice for quick accelerations. You could feel the momentum of the payload behind you every tick of the speedometer upwards. Something we became acutely aware of as we got used to the heavy load. At in-town speeds the truck felt good at 40-45mph. Quite comfortable to drive and change lanes. At stop lights though you quickly learned to add an extra hundred or so feet during braking maneuvers. Nobody likes to have a 20,000 pound Ford F-350 tap their rear bumper. The electric brakes proved to be pretty touchy - seemingly binary in operation (on or off with no in-between). Entering the onramp of the freeway at about 15 mph from a left turn we quickly got up to highway speeds. On the freeway the Ford again handled well and had little difficulty in passing slower moving traffic. We kept the truck in overdrive on the freeway and in drive on the surface streets of Phoenix. Overall the F-350 seemed to be quite a capable hauler. Second Driving Segment - Slight Incline, Two Lane Highway Conditions During a quick ten minute pit stop we changed into truck #4, a Heavy Duty GMC Sierra 3500 Crew Cab configured simliarly to the F-350. The GMC Sierra was not at its maximum GCWR payload limit and unlike the F-350 the GMC HD was a two wheel drive truck with a 3.73 axle ratio. Wow. There is a big difference here ladies and gentlemen. The noise level of the Duramax while standing on the outside is something to marvel at. The Sierra was quieter than the F-350 but the biggest difference was between the Cummins and Duramax. It's just plain uncomfortable to stand near the Cummins too long at idle. While parked we can claim to have accidentally tried to start the GMC Sierra when its engine was already idling - that's how quiet it was at rest. The Duramax seemed to get up to highway speeds from a standing start much faster and significantly quieter than the Ford F-350 even with the smaller 3.73 axle ratio. Low end torque was always present. At 55 mph the Duramax had plenty of horsepower left in it at a touch of the pedal. Though we didn't get to try it out as much as we would have liked, the tow/haul mode made things very pleasant while braking. No switching between drive or overdrive was necessary because the Allison transmission's ability to seemingly figure out the mass and momentum of the Sierra was as uncanny as GM described it. Upon touching the brakes for several seconds to slow down the tow/haul mode automatically downshifted to help control the deceleration. This was braking on a fairly level surface though. Others who tested the truck got a glimpse at the braking under more severe hilly conditions where it also seemed to excel. We also didn't personally get to run the Ford F-350 and GMC Sierra HD side by side but were witness to several competitions between the two vehicles driven by other journalists. From a standing start on flat and uphill roads the Duramax beat the Power Stroke no questions asked. Every time. At highway speeds of 50 mph and side by side, the Duramax also handily pulled away from the Power Stroke each time. They were both quite dramatic presentations to help back the claims of General Motors. This you almost have to see to believe. Third Driving Segment - Hilly, Two Lane Highway Conditions For the third and final segment of our drive we chose truck #1, an unloaded GMC Heavy Duty 2500, 4 wheel drive, four door extended cab. We wound up calling this truck the hot rod. We took off in this sweet black number. After previously driving two 20,000 pound DRW behemoths in the first two segments of the drive this SRW Heavy Duty was just begging to be driven - hard. We were able to quickly prove that GM did indeed have a fuel cutoff on the engine to limit truck speed to around 95 mph on our truck. Our apologies to the crew of GM's escort van that had been leading all of the trucks on our merry journey into diesel land. Good thing PickupTruck.Com folks know how to read a map and the GM folks had been kind enough to give us good directions to the last stop on our outbound journey. If ever you were in the market for a light duty diesel truck to do your daily commuting in, this would be the truck. The engine had great response and gobs of torque and power without any payload. The interior was almost as quiet as a gasoline engine's interior at every speed except when totally mashing on the accelerator. The Sierra's ride was very comfortable for an unloaded 4x4. In fact we thought it more comfortable than the 4x4 3/4-ton Silverado we had driven the day before in Los Angeles which was very similarly equipped but for its gasoline engine. Coming Back from the Frontlines After everyone rallied at the edge of the Salt River we were allowed to pair off and select a Heavy Duty to drive back in without any GM chaperones. We missed out on getting the black hot rod again - which we had hoped to take off-road - and got back into the red dually we had driven during the second drive segment. Before we left we were able to lose the trailer and its heavy load. Driving the large Sierra back was pretty pleasant. The engine had lots of spare power now that it was free of the trailer. Even though it was a two wheel drive truck, we did manage to take it off-road a little to get some good photos and video, which you will see in the coming weeks. After such an exciting day at the frontlines a passenger even fell asleep in the truck - further proof of the quiet interior resulting from the Duramax's low NVH levels. Aside from running into an apparent swarm of killer bees just before we got back to the hotel (honest, we swear - the swarm looked like a small black cloud) the drive to the hotel was low key. Nothing like having a Heavy Duty when facing those nasty little buggers. Summing it All Up In summary, GM appears to have taken the lead, if only momentarily, in the heavy duty truck wars. The new Duramax from Isuzu, Allison and GM is going to send shockwaves throughout the truck marketplace. GM is sure to gain much of the ground it has given up while fighting alone now that it has teamed up with such capable allies as Isuzu and Allison. The new Heavy Duty trucks may even help Chevrolet once again capture the number one sales position from Ford in the pickup truck marketplace if the others are sleeping behind their walls. Now the fine print... We
understand you are buying online, but with us you are not buying blind!
We handwrite every single description. We provide 24+ high resolution
pictures & we inspect and photo what you see and what you can't see.
We'll also be glad to email you detailed, closeup pictures of any area
you'd like to see more of. People ask us all the time what is the catch
to our vehicles. They assume that the prices are low because there is
something wrong with them. Nothing could be further from the truth! Our
secret is simple...LOW OVERHEAD. We are an internet-only dealer. We do
not maintain regular office hours or a large sales facility. We simply
have a Mississippi bonded dealer's license, a storage lot, and a
computer. Since we don't have dozens of mechanics, helpers, salesmen,
secretaries, etc. on our payroll; we are able to sell at greatly reduced
prices. We've put this vehicle through our EXTENSIVE inspection process & can report it has a great ride & drive! We do our best to let you know of any/all issues we can find on these vehicles since you're buying sight-unseen. The power mirrors do not work. We'll try to fix them, but bid assuming they do not work. WATCH THE VIDEO. If you have any specific questions then don't hesitate to call us email us. Please understand we do our best to describe, in detail, every vehicle we offer to the Ebay public. However, if you have any hesitation during the bidding period, please obtain a Buyer's Inspection PRIOR TO PLACING YOUR BID to satisfy yourself. After the auction ends, understand you are the legal winning bidder of this auction and agree to all our Terms and Conditions. Be
sure and take a look at the book values on this vehicle (or any other
we have for sale) before you bid. We stopped offering a built-in BuyIt
Now option due to ebay's policy of letting anyone with an email address
register a username. We had half a dozen de@dbe@t
bidders in a row hit the BIN with no intention of paying. We do have a
BuyIt Now price so give us a call if you're interested. Make sure you
call us for more information on this vehicle. As always though, our
reserve is THOUSANDS less than NADA value so bid early & bid often
so you don't miss out!
|
Chevrolet Silverado 3500 for Sale
Used 06 chevy k3500hd regular cab 4x4 stahl utility box 6.0l v8 auto work truck(US $20,990.00)
08 silverado 3500 lt2 4wd diesel 4dr flatbed loaded leather xnice txtruck!(US $19,995.00)
2009 chevrolet silverado 3500hd 4x4 crew cab 6.6l duramax allison tx one owner(US $19,450.00)
Turbo-diesel 4x4!!!!!!!!!......no reserve!!!!!!!!!!!!......needs tlc
2002 duramax diesel, chevy silverado 3500 extcab 4x4 10' dump plow
Chevrolet 3500 dually hd 4x4 diesel(US $57,000.00)
Auto Services in Mississippi
Wathas ★★★★★
Sistrunk`s Sales & Service ★★★★★
S & S Auto Sales ★★★★★
Petal Auto Parts Inc ★★★★★
Natchez Ford Lincoln Mercury ★★★★★
Marion Towing ★★★★★
Auto blog
GM won't pay owners of recalled cars for lost value
Thu, 12 Jun 2014Kenneth Feinberg, the man in charge of the General Motors compensation fund dealing with the its widespread ignition switch woes, has issued an informal, two-letter response to the plaintiffs in more than 70 lawsuits seeking redress for lost resale value of their Cobalts: "No." The cases were recently combined into one, but Feinberg told The Detroit News that the fund will deal "only with death and physical injury claims," and that "perceived diminished value" will get no consideration.
ALG, the firm specializing in establishing residual values, determined that Cobalt owners had lost $300 compared to the segment competition and doesn't envision any long-term effects from the recall situation. Feinberg's statement comes in advance of public details on how the compensation fund will work and adheres to GM's long-held position on the matter. The company has already asked a judge to throw out such suits using the pre-bankruptcy defense, even as it stopped using that defense in cases of injury and death.
With plenty of potential gain from the GM suit, however, don't expect the plaintiffs to give up yet. When Toyota was sued for the same reason during the unintended acceleration debacle, it eventually settled the case for between $1 billion and $1.4 billion just to get it over with. Since the 85 law firms involved in the Toyota litigation took home more than $250 million of that total, we shouldn't expect the attorneys to give up on a GM payout, either.
GM recalls 8,500 Chevrolet Malibu models for rear suspension glitch
Mon, 04 Feb 2013According to a letter from General Motors to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, flaws in the build process of the 2013 Chevrolet Malibu have led to the recall of 8,519 cars. Units built between December 6, 2011 and January 15, 2013 may have been assembled with rear suspension cradles that had insufficient torque applied to certain bolts. That out-of-spec assembly could lead to issues ranging from slight noises to a loss of vehicle control.
The problem was first noticed in December of last year by a GM test fleet driver and eventually tracked back to the improperly torqued bolts on the suspension cradle assembled through July 2012 by a supplier located not too far from the Malibu's Detroit/Hamtramck Assembly Plant. Since an official NHTSA recall notice has not been issued yet, it isn't clear whether or not Detroit-built Malibus were the only ones affected (the 2013 Malibu is also built at GM's Fairfax Assembly Plant in Kansas City, Kansas). Dealers will fix the problem by inspecting vehicles for proper torque specs, retightening if not within specs and, in some cases, perform a rear-wheel alignment.
Toyota tops Kelley Blue Book's Resale Value Awards
Tue, 27 Nov 2012Kelley Blue Book announced its annual Best Resale Value Award winners, and we weren't too surprised to see the list dominated by Japanese automakers - mainly Toyota and Honda. KBB hands out the awards based on the projected residual value of mostly all 2013 model year vehicles, and Toyota skated home with a number of awards including 10 of the 22 overall categories and having five of its products in the top 10 for models with best resale value. KBB's Best Resale Value Awards were announced in the same week as the ALG Residual Value Awards, and there were many similarities between both lists, especially when it came to Toyota.
To come up with its winners, KBB measures depreciation over the first five years of ownership, and looks for the cars it expects to hold its value the best after this time; on average, the report says the 2013 model year vehicles will lose 61.8 percent of its value in five years. Of the 22 categories, 15 slots were filled by Toyota, Honda and Nissan products, while the Camaro and Porsche (Cayenne and Panamera) each took home a pair of awards. If Toyota has anything to be upset about in this list of cars, it's that categories for Hybrid/Alternative Energy Car and Electric Vehicle went to the Ford Fusion and Chevrolet Volt, respectively.
The overall top 10 models for the best resale value in 2013 are, in alphabetical order: