Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1973 Chevrolet Camaro Z-28 Rs on 2040-cars

US $24,000.00
Year:1973 Mileage:68000 Color: Orange /
 Black
Location:

Topock, Arizona, United States

Topock, Arizona, United States

For more pictures email at: santoskkeiser@bigboys.net .

1973 Z28 RS Camaro (Matching Numbers Drive Train). California Car with all original smog equipment!

Complete frame off restoration with each and every metal part, nuts and bolts glass beaded down to original finish. Car is correctly finished throughout and has a beautifully detailed red oxide primer undercarriage. Finished in original medium orange (PPG) with white stripes over black interior.
Every original chrome piece went through 3 stage process and looks flawless.
Rebuilt .30 over Matching numbers 350/L-82 engine 245 HP with build sheet (Ratings were changed in 73 from fly wheel to rear end. If same formula was used in 70-72 HP would be 315 or + 28%).
Completely Rebuilt matching numbers Muncie 4 speed transmission close ratio (Only 4400 produced with close ratio 4 speed).
Matching Numbers rear end completely rebuilt including new bearings and seals. 3.73 10 bolt positraction unit.
AC System completely reconditioned, new lines, OE compressor including dash controls to factory specs. ( First Year for AC )
All new brake rotors, drums, calipers and hardware with new brake lines front to back. Correct 11 inch cast iron front disc brakes. In the rear of the car are the 9.5 inch drums which are standard.
New power steering gear box, pump and pressure lines.
All seat springs removed sand blasted and re-painted with black and clear coat!
Brand new factory Goodyear poly glass tires which were factory original for the Z28 in 1973.
The car is equipped with the original factory intake with the correct Rochester Quadra jet carburetor rebuilt to factory specification retaining matching numbers.
Center console with all instruments, radio and clock functioning perfect. Leather seats front and back all re-upholstered using factory matching material and new foam. All seat springs and frames sandblasted and powder coated.

Auto Services in Arizona

Valleywide TV Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Satellite & Cable TV Equipment & Systems Repair & Service, Television & Radio-Service & Repair
Address: 5930 W Greenway Rd Ste #10, Peoria
Phone: (602) 354-5557

Ultimate Imports ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Transmission
Address: 1900 N McClintock Dr Suite 15, Scottsdale
Phone: (866) 595-6470

Tucson Auto Collision Center ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 2510 W Wetmore Rd, Marana
Phone: (520) 292-1330

ToyoMotors Service and Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Inspection Stations & Services, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: 2818 E Bell Rd, Sun-City
Phone: (602) 971-8137

The Auto Shop Inc. ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube, Automotive Alternators & Generators
Address: 901 N Central Ave, Peoria
Phone: (602) 256-6164

Tech 1 Auto ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair, Radiators Automotive Sales & Service
Address: 8736 West Thunderbird Road #3, Surprise
Phone: (623) 486-4824

Auto blog

Survey says $25k barrier is a problem for EVs

Sun, 01 Dec 2013



The majority of consumers are more or less priced out of the market.
Electric cars are gaining popularity with the general public, but are they still too expensive? According to a survey 1,084 consumers by Navigant Research, a consulting firm located in Boulder, CO, 71 percent want their next car to cost under $25,000, while 41 percent won't go a cent above $20K. Looks like people are even thriftier than we'd originally thought.

GM won't pay owners of recalled cars for lost value

Thu, 12 Jun 2014

Kenneth Feinberg, the man in charge of the General Motors compensation fund dealing with the its widespread ignition switch woes, has issued an informal, two-letter response to the plaintiffs in more than 70 lawsuits seeking redress for lost resale value of their Cobalts: "No." The cases were recently combined into one, but Feinberg told The Detroit News that the fund will deal "only with death and physical injury claims," and that "perceived diminished value" will get no consideration.
ALG, the firm specializing in establishing residual values, determined that Cobalt owners had lost $300 compared to the segment competition and doesn't envision any long-term effects from the recall situation. Feinberg's statement comes in advance of public details on how the compensation fund will work and adheres to GM's long-held position on the matter. The company has already asked a judge to throw out such suits using the pre-bankruptcy defense, even as it stopped using that defense in cases of injury and death.
With plenty of potential gain from the GM suit, however, don't expect the plaintiffs to give up yet. When Toyota was sued for the same reason during the unintended acceleration debacle, it eventually settled the case for between $1 billion and $1.4 billion just to get it over with. Since the 85 law firms involved in the Toyota litigation took home more than $250 million of that total, we shouldn't expect the attorneys to give up on a GM payout, either.

GM recalling over 243,000 crossovers over possible seat belt defect

Tue, 17 Aug 2010

2010 Buick Enclave - Click above for high-res image gallery
The summer of 2010's recall hit parade continues unabated today, with General Motors having just announced that it is asking 243,403 owners of its 2009-2010 Lambda crossovers to bring their three-row haulers in for inspection. The culprit? Second-row seat belts in select Buick Enclave, Chevrolet Traverse, GMC Acadia, and Saturn Outlook CUVs have "failed to perform properly in a crash."
According to GM, a second-row seat-side trim piece is to blame, as it can impede the upward rotation of the buckle after the seat is folded flat. As a result, if the buckle makes contact with the seat frame, cosmetic damage can occur, potentially requiring additional force to operate the buckle properly. So far, no great shakes, but in the process of applying that additional force, the occupant may push the buckle cover down to the strap, potentially revealing and depressing the red release button. As a result of this, the belt may not latch, or in certain cases, it may actually appear to be latched when, in fact, it isn't.