1965 Chevy Pickup C10 on 2040-cars
Richmond, Virginia, United States
Engine:Unknown
Vehicle Title:Clear
Mileage: 99,999
Make: Chevrolet
Exterior Color: Black
Model: C-10
Trim: Base 2 Door
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Drive Type: FWD
65 CHEVY PICKUP
Needs tire pumped up - I am not aware any other problems.
Truck was last cranked up and running a year ago.
GREAT RESTORATION PROJECT
65 truck 6 cyclinder 3 speed
I don't know size motor
Truck belonged to my late father - I have owned it for past 30 years.
Some rust - but I've seen them on road looking worse than this one
Since these pics were taken, the wind/rain has torn off some of paneling ( bondo ) on drivers side.
Chevrolet C-10 for Sale
- 1977 chevrolet c-10 scottsdale 4x4 - classic truck (project)(US $3,000.00)
- 1969 chevrolet c10 pickup(US $10,000.00)
- Chevy blazer - 1972 (custom roadster)(US $15,000.00)
- 1971 chevy c-10 custom deluxe show truck(US $15,900.00)
- 1965 chevrolet c-10 pickup world class build no exspense spared new build(US $55,000.00)
- 1965 chevy c10 shortbed
Auto Services in Virginia
Universal Ford Inc ★★★★★
United Solar Window Film and Grphics Corporation Window Tint ★★★★★
Rose Auto Clinic ★★★★★
R&C Towing & Repair Company ★★★★★
Overseas Imports ★★★★★
Olympic Auto Parts ★★★★★
Auto blog
The story of the 2014 Chevrolet SS: "Luxury, power, refinement, handling"
Thu, 07 Mar 2013Not including the women and men who built it, the 2014 Chevrolet SS has only been seen in person by a piddling number of people - fewer humans than would fill the gymnasium at a high school volleyball game. Not including the men and women who built it, no one has driven it. Even so, it is already saddled with two controversies: the way it looks and the way it shifts.
First to that shifting. Did we love the last Americanized Holden, the awesomely sportsome Pontiac G8 GXP, and its six-speed manual? Of course. Do we wish the SS came with a six-speed manual? Of course. But we'd like a toboggan to come with a manual transmission. We'd put a manual transmission on a weasel if we could because we're just wired that way; if it moves, it should come with a stick and a clutch. Or at least the option.
Let's climb down off the ledge, though. We haven't driven the SS and we have no idea how good (or not) the automatic is. And the Hobson's Choice in transmissions when it comes to sport sedans like the BMW M5, Mercedes-Benz E63 AMG and Jaguar XFR-S and, oh yeah, cars-that-really-should-have-manuals like the Audi R8 and Nissan GT-R and Porsche 918 and every single Lamborghini and Ferrari, for instance, hasn't stopped us from enjoying what is clearly the gruesome, dual-clutched demise of Western automotive civilization. Because in spite of our ululations at the dying of the six-speed light, we understand.
Submit your questions for Autoblog Podcast #321 LIVE!
Tue, 19 Feb 2013We're set to record Autoblog Podcast #321 tonight, and you can drop us your questions and comments regarding the rest of the week's news via our Q&A module below. Subscribe to the Autoblog Podcast in iTunes if you haven't already done so, and if you want to take it all in live, tune in to our UStream (audio only) channel at 10:00 PM Eastern tonight.
Discussion Topics for Autoblog Podcast Episode #321
Unibody Ford Ranger replacement
Consumer Reports criticizes small turbo engines for misleading performance, fuel economy claims [w/video]
Tue, 05 Feb 2013Consumer Reports has taken aim at at small-displacement, forced-induction engines, saying the powerplants don't manage to deliver on automaker fuel economy claims. Manufacturers have long held that smaller, turbocharged engines pack all power of their larger displacement cousins with significantly better fuel economy, but the research organization says that despite scoring high EPA economy numbers, the engines are no better than conventional drivetrains in both categories. Jake Fisher, director of automotive testing for Consumer Reports, says the forced induction options "are often slower and less fuel efficient than larger four and six-cylinder engines."
Specifically, CR calls out the new Ford Fusion equipped with the automaker's Ecoboost 1.6-liter four-cylinder engine. The institute's researchers found the engine, which is a $795 option over the base 2.5-liter four-cylinder, fails to match competitors in acceleration and served up 25 miles per gallon in testing, putting the sedan dead last among other midsize options.
The Chevrolet Cruze, Hyundai Sonata Turbo and Ford Escape 2.0T all got dinged for the same troubles, though Consumer Reports has found the turbo 2.0-liter four-cylinder in the BMW 328i does deliver on its promises. You can check out the full press release below. You can also read the full study on the Consumer Reports site, or scroll down for a short video recap.